Kaleido registry: A multi-center registry platform with site staff and automation to enable accelerated clinical research and drug development at scale in community practices.

11020 Background: The number of candidate drugs and clinical trials in oncology is rapidly increasing, necessitating innovative approaches to streamline patient identification, enrollment, and trial execution. However, data collection for patient eligibility assessments remains highly manual, placing significant burden on clinical teams. Technology solutions leveraging Electronic Health Records (EHR) data are emerging, but missing or inaccurate data often impede high-fidelity and low-latency prescreening. In 2022, the Kaleido registry was initiated to address these challenges by implementing on-site staff, abstraction prior to each visit, and draft notes for medical oncologists in the registry. Methods: The Kaleido registry enrolls patients with oncological/hematological diagnoses at four community practice sites. Real-time data abstraction is performed in all patients prior to each visit in an expanding set of indications (NSCLC, CRC, prostate cancer, and myeloproliferative neoplasms) to provide systematic and unbiased trial pre-screening. An automated prescreening tool has been developed and validated in 394 pts to identify potential trial candidates. Standardized note drafts free up staff time. A questionnaire addressing social determinants of health (SDOH) and self-reported performance status was introduced to further reduce missing data in the EHR. Results: To date, over 10,000 patients (61% female, 39% male) have been enrolled. 6% of approached patients declined to consent. The most common diagnoses include breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancer. The automated prescreening tool was validated with 90% sensitivity and 97% specificity. The patient questionnaire has a completeness rate of 99%. Real-time abstraction was demonstrated to be feasible, with completeness above 90% for key variables. Among patients with metastatic NSCLC, the genomic testing rates exceeded 80% supporting the sites’ suitability for clinical trials. Conclusions: With high consent rates, data completeness, and a validated automation tool, the Kaleido registry offers a scalable model for systematic, unbiased patient recruitment and comprehensive data collection across oncology/hematology. This approach has the potential to accelerate clinical research and drug development in oncology and hematology, ultimately enhancing trial efficiency and improving patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.11020
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kaleido registry: A multi-center registry platform with site staff and automation to enable accelerated clinical research and drug development at scale in community practices.

Luis T. Campos, Barbara Mcaneny, Wei-Yi Chung, Annette Campbell Fontaine et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Kaleido registry: A multi-center registry platform with site staff and automation to enable accelerated clinical research and drug development at scale in community practices.

Luis T. Campos, Barbara Mcaneny, Wei-Yi Chung, Annette Campbell Fontaine, Alexander Pan, Julio A. Peguero, G. S. Gordon, Laura Guerra, Christer Svedman, Valerie Tucker, Michael Zach Koontz, Nowsheen Azeemuddin
article en

Abstract

11020 Background: The number of candidate drugs and clinical trials in oncology is rapidly increasing, necessitating innovative approaches to streamline patient identification, enrollment, and trial execution. However, data collection for patient eligibility assessments remains highly manual, placing significant burden on clinical teams. Technology solutions leveraging Electronic Health Records (EHR) data are emerging, but missing or inaccurate data often impede high-fidelity and low-latency prescreening. In 2022, the Kaleido registry was initiated to address these challenges by implementing on-site staff, abstraction prior to each visit, and draft notes for medical oncologists in the registry. Methods: The Kaleido registry enrolls patients with oncological/hematological diagnoses at four community practice sites. Real-time data abstraction is performed in all patients prior to each visit in an expanding set of indications (NSCLC, CRC, prostate cancer, and myeloproliferative neoplasms) to provide systematic and unbiased trial pre-screening. An automated prescreening tool has been developed and validated in 394 pts to identify potential trial candidates. Standardized note drafts free up staff time. A questionnaire addressing social determinants of health (SDOH) and self-reported performance status was introduced to further reduce missing data in the EHR. Results: To date, over 10,000 patients (61% female, 39% male) have been enrolled. 6% of approached patients declined to consent. The most common diagnoses include breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancer. The automated prescreening tool was validated with 90% sensitivity and 97% specificity. The patient questionnaire has a completeness rate of 99%. Real-time abstraction was demonstrated to be feasible, with completeness above 90% for key variables. Among patients with metastatic NSCLC, the genomic testing rates exceeded 80% supporting the sites’ suitability for clinical trials. Conclusions: With high consent rates, data completeness, and a validated automation tool, the Kaleido registry offers a scalable model for systematic, unbiased patient recruitment and comprehensive data collection across oncology/hematology. This approach has the potential to accelerate clinical research and drug development in oncology and hematology, ultimately enhancing trial efficiency and improving patient outcomes.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Medical Oncology Hematology Consultants (US), New Mexico Cancer Center (US), Hematology Oncology Consultants (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.