Baseline ocular conditions and risk of ocular events in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) from the DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 trials of belantamab mafodotin (belamaf).

7544 Background: Belamaf combinations were evaluated for RRMM in the phase 3 DREAMM-7 (belamaf + bortezomib + dexamethasone [BVd]; NCT04246047) and DREAMM-8 (belamaf + pomalidomide + dexamethasone [BPd]; NCT04484623) trials, and significant progression-free survival benefits were reported over standard of care, with significant overall survival benefit reported for BVd. Ocular events (e.g., ocular adverse events [oAEs], blurred vision, dry eye) occurred with belamaf and most resolved with dose holds and modifications. We examined the baseline eye health of pts with RRMM receiving BVd or BPd, and whether baseline ocular conditions affected rates of treatment-emergent (TE) oAEs. Methods: Pts with ≥1 prior therapy were eligible for DREAMM-7/8; pts with ocular conditions were eligible except for corneal epithelial disease (mild punctate keratopathy was allowed). Mandatory ophthalmic examinations (best corrected visual acuity [BCVA], slit lamp, and funduscopic exams) were performed in both arms of the trials at baseline and routinely during treatment. oAEs were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Regardless of presence/absence of baseline ocular conditions, the same protocol-defined strategies were used for ocular event management during the studies. Results: In 392 pts treated with belamaf (n=242 DREAMM-7 and n=150 DREAMM-8), baseline ocular conditions were reported in 62% of pts (n=135 and 106); baseline conditions included cataract 50% (n=101 and 96), keratopathy 14% (n=33 and 23), dry eye 14% (n=31 and 24), visual acuity of 20/50 or worse 6% (n=18 and 7), glaucoma 6% (n=11 and 13), blepharitis 2% (n=4 and 3), age-related macular degeneration 1% (n=3 and 2), and diabetic retinopathy <1% (n=0 and 2). Any TE oAE was reported in 74% (n=100/135) and 87% (n=92/106) of pts with baseline ocular conditions in DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8, respectively, compared with 79% (n=85/107) and 91% (n=40/44) of pts without baseline ocular conditions (Table). Conclusions: The safety profiles of belamaf combinations for oAEs were similar between patients with vs without baseline ocular conditions, suggesting that these baseline ocular conditions did not increase the risk of TE oAEs. The effect of each baseline ocular condition on TE oAEs, as well as TE corneal exam findings and visual acuity changes, will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT04246047 , NCT04484623 . TE ocular events in patients receiving a belamaf combination in DREAMM-7/8. DREAMM-7 DREAMM-8 With any baseline ocular condition, n=135 No baseline ocular condition, n=107 With any baseline ocular condition, n=106 No baseline ocular condition, n=44 Any oAE, n (%) 100 (74) 85 (79) 92 (87) 40 (91)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.7544
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Baseline ocular conditions and risk of ocular events in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) from the DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 trials of belantamab mafodotin (belamaf).

Margaret Polinkovsky, Elisabet E. Manasanch, Paweł Robak, Shing Yip Lee et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
1.77
article

Baseline ocular conditions and risk of ocular events in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) from the DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 trials of belantamab mafodotin (belamaf).

Margaret Polinkovsky, Elisabet E. Manasanch, Paweł Robak, Shing Yip Lee, Ivan Špıčka, Marek Hus, Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos, Vera Zherebtsova, Sergey Voloshin, Sybil Varghese, Anna Sureda, Marcelo Pitombeira de Lacerda, Hanlon Sia, Hang Quach, Kihyun Kım, Meral Beksac, Luděk Pour, Esther González, Chang‐Ki Min, Vânia Hungria
article en
1 citations

Abstract

7544 Background: Belamaf combinations were evaluated for RRMM in the phase 3 DREAMM-7 (belamaf + bortezomib + dexamethasone [BVd]; NCT04246047) and DREAMM-8 (belamaf + pomalidomide + dexamethasone [BPd]; NCT04484623) trials, and significant progression-free survival benefits were reported over standard of care, with significant overall survival benefit reported for BVd. Ocular events (e.g., ocular adverse events [oAEs], blurred vision, dry eye) occurred with belamaf and most resolved with dose holds and modifications. We examined the baseline eye health of pts with RRMM receiving BVd or BPd, and whether baseline ocular conditions affected rates of treatment-emergent (TE) oAEs. Methods: Pts with ≥1 prior therapy were eligible for DREAMM-7/8; pts with ocular conditions were eligible except for corneal epithelial disease (mild punctate keratopathy was allowed). Mandatory ophthalmic examinations (best corrected visual acuity [BCVA], slit lamp, and funduscopic exams) were performed in both arms of the trials at baseline and routinely during treatment. oAEs were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Regardless of presence/absence of baseline ocular conditions, the same protocol-defined strategies were used for ocular event management during the studies. Results: In 392 pts treated with belamaf (n=242 DREAMM-7 and n=150 DREAMM-8), baseline ocular conditions were reported in 62% of pts (n=135 and 106); baseline conditions included cataract 50% (n=101 and 96), keratopathy 14% (n=33 and 23), dry eye 14% (n=31 and 24), visual acuity of 20/50 or worse 6% (n=18 and 7), glaucoma 6% (n=11 and 13), blepharitis 2% (n=4 and 3), age-related macular degeneration 1% (n=3 and 2), and diabetic retinopathy <1% (n=0 and 2). Any TE oAE was reported in 74% (n=100/135) and 87% (n=92/106) of pts with baseline ocular conditions in DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8, respectively, compared with 79% (n=85/107) and 91% (n=40/44) of pts without baseline ocular conditions (Table). Conclusions: The safety profiles of belamaf combinations for oAEs were similar between patients with vs without baseline ocular conditions, suggesting that these baseline ocular conditions did not increase the risk of TE oAEs. The effect of each baseline ocular condition on TE oAEs, as well as TE corneal exam findings and visual acuity changes, will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT04246047 , NCT04484623 . TE ocular events in patients receiving a belamaf combination in DREAMM-7/8. DREAMM-7 DREAMM-8 With any baseline ocular condition, n=135 No baseline ocular condition, n=107 With any baseline ocular condition, n=106 No baseline ocular condition, n=44 Any oAE, n (%) 100 (74) 85 (79) 92 (87) 40 (91)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Medical University of Lublin (PL), The University of Melbourne (AU), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Charles University (CZ), Samsung Medical Center (KR), St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU), Universidade da Região de Joinville (BR), University Hospital Brno (CZ), São Germano Oncologia (BR), GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US), Botkin Hospital (RU), Istinye University (TR), Russian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology (RU), Canossa Private Hospital (AU), Duran i Reynals Hospital (ES), Hospital Universitario De Cabueñes (ES), St. Paul's Hospital (KR), Liv Hospital (TR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
1.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.