Barriers and facilitators of advance care planning practices in multi-disciplinary, multi-facility palliative care for Japan’s aging population: A qualitative analysis

Globally, multi-disciplinary advance care planning (ACP) in multi-facility settings for aging communities is essential; however, it does not consistently yield the desired outcomes. Japan's population is rapidly aging; nonetheless, no studies have examined comprehensive ACP implementation by diverse professionals across various community healthcare facilities. Within the context of an aging community, this study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to ACP implementation by multiple professionals in various healthcare facilities. A qualitative research design was employed. The study participants included 22 multidisciplinary members of a community-based palliative care (CBPC) team. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted between September and October 2019. A total of 19 barriers and 19 facilitators were identified and categorized into seven practice domains: "Understanding patients' intentions," "Family support," "Information sharing using tools," "Collaboration among multiple professions," "Cross-facility and cross-departmental cooperation," "Raising awareness in the community," and "Efforts by implementation promoters and their departments." Barriers included "Inability to understand the patient's intentions," "Physical and psychological distance between patient and family," and "Different information needs and sharing methods at each facility," among others. Facilitators included "Skills for better understanding the true meaning of patients' intentions," "Compatibility of daily tasks and ACP by utilizing tools," "Human connections between professionals in multiple facilities and departments," and "Engagement with ACP implementation," among others. The study identified important domains for practical ACP implementation using a community-based palliative care team collaborating across multiple community facilities, as well as the barriers and facilitators. The findings indicate that multi-disciplinary, multi-facility ACP implementation in regions with aging populations requires establishing a regional collaborative network system and a human network. Healthcare professionals must develop practical ACP experience to identify its benefits while enhancing their skills as "advocates."

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323976
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and facilitators of advance care planning practices in multi-disciplinary, multi-facility palliative care for Japan’s aging population: A qualitative analysis

Mariko Tanimoto, Mitsunori Nishikawa, Kenji Sawada, T. Igarashi et al.
2 citations
PLoS ONE
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
3.76
article

Barriers and facilitators of advance care planning practices in multi-disciplinary, multi-facility palliative care for Japan’s aging population: A qualitative analysis

Mariko Tanimoto, Mitsunori Nishikawa, Kenji Sawada, T. Igarashi, N. Okamura
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Globally, multi-disciplinary advance care planning (ACP) in multi-facility settings for aging communities is essential; however, it does not consistently yield the desired outcomes. Japan's population is rapidly aging; nonetheless, no studies have examined comprehensive ACP implementation by diverse professionals across various community healthcare facilities. Within the context of an aging community, this study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to ACP implementation by multiple professionals in various healthcare facilities. A qualitative research design was employed. The study participants included 22 multidisciplinary members of a community-based palliative care (CBPC) team. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted between September and October 2019. A total of 19 barriers and 19 facilitators were identified and categorized into seven practice domains: "Understanding patients' intentions," "Family support," "Information sharing using tools," "Collaboration among multiple professions," "Cross-facility and cross-departmental cooperation," "Raising awareness in the community," and "Efforts by implementation promoters and their departments." Barriers included "Inability to understand the patient's intentions," "Physical and psychological distance between patient and family," and "Different information needs and sharing methods at each facility," among others. Facilitators included "Skills for better understanding the true meaning of patients' intentions," "Compatibility of daily tasks and ACP by utilizing tools," "Human connections between professionals in multiple facilities and departments," and "Engagement with ACP implementation," among others. The study identified important domains for practical ACP implementation using a community-based palliative care team collaborating across multiple community facilities, as well as the barriers and facilitators. The findings indicate that multi-disciplinary, multi-facility ACP implementation in regions with aging populations requires establishing a regional collaborative network system and a human network. Healthcare professionals must develop practical ACP experience to identify its benefits while enhancing their skills as "advocates."

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
Tokyo Health Care University (JP), Aichi Health Promotion Foundation (JP), Nishikawa Hospital (JP), National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (JP)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.