Barriers to germline genetic testing in advanced prostate cancer: Survey results from the Germline Genetics Working Group of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (PCCTC).

e17073 Background: The NCCN began recommending germline genetic testing for individuals with high-risk or advanced prostate cancer (PCa) in 2017. In 2019, our survey of physicians within the PCCTC showed that the adoption of germline testing was not widespread: 62% of physicians considered testing for all men with metastatic PCa (mPCa) and 12% considered testing for men with high risk localized PCa. In 2024 we conducted a follow up survey to evaluate changes in perception of germline testing uptake, clinic workflow and barriers. Methods: A 22-item survey was distributed via email to physicians associated with the PCCTC and was open for responses between 5/24/2024 and 7/11/2024. We collected data on physicians’ personal practices around germline testing in PCa, perceived barriers to testing and uptake of the testing. Results: 379 physicians received the germline genetic testing current practice survey, and 90 (24%) completed the survey. A total of 40% (36/90) of participating physicians reported that they refer eligible patients to a separate department for genetic testing and counseling, and more than half (70%) reported taking personal responsibility for some or all genetic education and testing of their eligible patients. 21% (19/90) reported obtaining genetic testing results through patient enrollment in a research study. When asked for a best estimate of all PCa patients who meet current NCCN criteria for germline testing who have completed testing, 28% (22/80) of physicians responded with a range of 51-75%. The remaining responses of participating physicians are split with 26% estimating >76%, 25% estimating 26-50%, and 21% estimating <26% of patients who qualify receive germline genetic testing. The majority of responders reported considering some mPCa patients for germline genetic testing: 81% reported considering all mPCa patients; 34% considered testing mPCa patients with a family history, and 38% considered testing only those for whom results would influence treatment (FDA-approved targeted therapy or trial candidates). More than half of the participating physicians (54%) considered germline genetic testing for some PCa patients with high-risk localized PCa. Based on participant responses and free text comments, cited barriers in streamlining genetic testing were: clinical workflow, time and space availability, access to genetic counselors, out of pocket cost, insurance coverage, access to resources for provider/patient education, among others. Conclusions: Physician uptake of germline genetic testing has increased since our initial survey in 2019. A greater percentage of participating physicians report ordering germline testing in their clinic and providing pre- and post-test counseling. Clinic flow and access to genetic counselors remain prominent barriers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e17073
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to germline genetic testing in advanced prostate cancer: Survey results from the Germline Genetics Working Group of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (PCCTC).

Ashwin Sachdeva, Alexandra Sokolova, Rossella Graffeo, Feighanne Hathaway et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Barriers to germline genetic testing in advanced prostate cancer: Survey results from the Germline Genetics Working Group of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (PCCTC).

Ashwin Sachdeva, Alexandra Sokolova, Rossella Graffeo, Feighanne Hathaway, Mary‐Ellen Taplin, Stacy Loeb, Heather H. Cheng, Pedro Coelho Barata, Rana R. McKay, Jacob E. Berchuck, Burcu F. Darst, Mark N. Stein, Veda N. Giri, Daniel H. Kwon, Channing Judith Paller, Walter M. Stadler, Emily S. Weg, Zachery R. Reichert, Maria J. A. Ribeiro, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis
article en

Abstract

e17073 Background: The NCCN began recommending germline genetic testing for individuals with high-risk or advanced prostate cancer (PCa) in 2017. In 2019, our survey of physicians within the PCCTC showed that the adoption of germline testing was not widespread: 62% of physicians considered testing for all men with metastatic PCa (mPCa) and 12% considered testing for men with high risk localized PCa. In 2024 we conducted a follow up survey to evaluate changes in perception of germline testing uptake, clinic workflow and barriers. Methods: A 22-item survey was distributed via email to physicians associated with the PCCTC and was open for responses between 5/24/2024 and 7/11/2024. We collected data on physicians’ personal practices around germline testing in PCa, perceived barriers to testing and uptake of the testing. Results: 379 physicians received the germline genetic testing current practice survey, and 90 (24%) completed the survey. A total of 40% (36/90) of participating physicians reported that they refer eligible patients to a separate department for genetic testing and counseling, and more than half (70%) reported taking personal responsibility for some or all genetic education and testing of their eligible patients. 21% (19/90) reported obtaining genetic testing results through patient enrollment in a research study. When asked for a best estimate of all PCa patients who meet current NCCN criteria for germline testing who have completed testing, 28% (22/80) of physicians responded with a range of 51-75%. The remaining responses of participating physicians are split with 26% estimating >76%, 25% estimating 26-50%, and 21% estimating <26% of patients who qualify receive germline genetic testing. The majority of responders reported considering some mPCa patients for germline genetic testing: 81% reported considering all mPCa patients; 34% considered testing mPCa patients with a family history, and 38% considered testing only those for whom results would influence treatment (FDA-approved targeted therapy or trial candidates). More than half of the participating physicians (54%) considered germline genetic testing for some PCa patients with high-risk localized PCa. Based on participant responses and free text comments, cited barriers in streamlining genetic testing were: clinical workflow, time and space availability, access to genetic counselors, out of pocket cost, insurance coverage, access to resources for provider/patient education, among others. Conclusions: Physician uptake of germline genetic testing has increased since our initial survey in 2019. A greater percentage of participating physicians report ordering germline testing in their clinic and providing pre- and post-test counseling. Clinic flow and access to genetic counselors remain prominent barriers.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of Minnesota (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Washington (US), University of Michigan (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Yale Cancer Center (US), University of Manchester (GB), University of California San Diego (US), University of Chicago (US), NYU Langone Health (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Cancer Research Center (US), Atlanta VA Medical Center (US), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Prostate Cancer Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.