Analysis of a pre-screening platform for clinical trials in patients with prostate cancer.

e17103 Background: The clinical development process is often delayed by slow patient enrollment. Currently, <5% of oncology patients participate in clinical trials, with significant underrepresentation of diverse populations compared to the general patient demographic. N-Power Medicine (NPM) has developed a systematic, unbiased pre-screening platform aimed at enhancing the efficiency and diversity of clinical trial enrollment. We provide results from a pilot study in prostate cancer in a single community oncology site. Methods: The NPM pre-screening platform consists of 3 components: (1) a patient registry (Kaleido); (2) onsite and remote staff to consent patients and ensure data completeness and standardization; and (3) technology to enable real-time data abstraction and workflow management. The platform reduces site burden and utilizes routine care data captured in electronic medical records (EMR) combined with the standardized abstraction of select clinical trial-relevant variables for prostate cancer patients. Data was abstracted prior to each visit in order to capture potential clinical trial candidates in a timely fashion. Results: 781 patients had a visit from March to December 2024. Median age was 75 years (range 46-98). 75% of patients were aged below 80. 31% were metastatic, 62% had early stage disease, 6.3% were completing staging studies or had unknown or missing status for stage/metastatic status. In patients with metastatic disease (249), the distribution of ECOG PS was (0/1/2/3/4): 46%/18%/14%/3%, and not available in 18% of patients. In the time interval, among pts with metastatic disease, 28 pts were identified when treatment-naive, 14 transitioning to 2nd line of therapy, 9 to 3rd line of therapy and 42 to 4th or later line of therapy. Conclusions: The NPM platform enabled systematic and unbiased pre-screening identifying patients at transition points of care when they are potential candidates for clinical trials in a timely fashion. The platform has the potential to improve the recruitment process without adding burdens to oncology sites as the process can be automated so as to select the subset of patients most likely to be trial eligible, thereby improving the efficiency of research and physician staff in final review of these selected patients for trial participation. This approach is a critical step toward enhancing trial execution efficiency and enabling greater participant diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e17103
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of a pre-screening platform for clinical trials in patients with prostate cancer.

Barbara Mcaneny, Wei-Yi Chung, Annette Campbell Fontaine, Jose W. Avitia et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Analysis of a pre-screening platform for clinical trials in patients with prostate cancer.

Barbara Mcaneny, Wei-Yi Chung, Annette Campbell Fontaine, Jose W. Avitia, Christer Svedman, Valerie Tucker
article en

Abstract

e17103 Background: The clinical development process is often delayed by slow patient enrollment. Currently, <5% of oncology patients participate in clinical trials, with significant underrepresentation of diverse populations compared to the general patient demographic. N-Power Medicine (NPM) has developed a systematic, unbiased pre-screening platform aimed at enhancing the efficiency and diversity of clinical trial enrollment. We provide results from a pilot study in prostate cancer in a single community oncology site. Methods: The NPM pre-screening platform consists of 3 components: (1) a patient registry (Kaleido); (2) onsite and remote staff to consent patients and ensure data completeness and standardization; and (3) technology to enable real-time data abstraction and workflow management. The platform reduces site burden and utilizes routine care data captured in electronic medical records (EMR) combined with the standardized abstraction of select clinical trial-relevant variables for prostate cancer patients. Data was abstracted prior to each visit in order to capture potential clinical trial candidates in a timely fashion. Results: 781 patients had a visit from March to December 2024. Median age was 75 years (range 46-98). 75% of patients were aged below 80. 31% were metastatic, 62% had early stage disease, 6.3% were completing staging studies or had unknown or missing status for stage/metastatic status. In patients with metastatic disease (249), the distribution of ECOG PS was (0/1/2/3/4): 46%/18%/14%/3%, and not available in 18% of patients. In the time interval, among pts with metastatic disease, 28 pts were identified when treatment-naive, 14 transitioning to 2nd line of therapy, 9 to 3rd line of therapy and 42 to 4th or later line of therapy. Conclusions: The NPM platform enabled systematic and unbiased pre-screening identifying patients at transition points of care when they are potential candidates for clinical trials in a timely fashion. The platform has the potential to improve the recruitment process without adding burdens to oncology sites as the process can be automated so as to select the subset of patients most likely to be trial eligible, thereby improving the efficiency of research and physician staff in final review of these selected patients for trial participation. This approach is a critical step toward enhancing trial execution efficiency and enabling greater participant diversity.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Medical Oncology Hematology Consultants (US), New Mexico Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.