Bilateral mastectomy and breast cancer mortality for invasive lobular carcinoma: A SEER-based study.

585 Background: Many women with unilateral breast cancer opt for bilateral mastectomy. While removing the unaffected contralateral breast lowers the risk of second primary cancers, there is no benefit on breast cancer mortality. Studies have not investigated whether this holds true for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). To estimate the 20-year risk of breast cancer mortality in women with stage I-III unilateral ILC and compare survival outcomes between unilateral lumpectomy, unilateral mastectomy and bilateral mastectomy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify women diagnosed with unilateral invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) between 2000 and 2020. The cohort was followed for up to 20 years to assess contralateral breast cancer and breast cancer-specific survival. We estimated crude mortality rates, 20-year cumulative breast cancer mortality, and hazard ratios by surgical treatment group. Kaplan-Meier was used for cumulative risk, and Cox proportional hazards models for unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: We identified 58,861 women with unilateral ILC. Of which, 34,561 (59%) had lumpectomy, 18,894 (32%) had unilateral mastectomy, and 5406 (9.1%) had bilateral mastectomy. The mean age (in years) was 64 ±11 for unilateral lumpectomy, 62 ±13 for unilateral mastectomy, and 57±11 for bilateral mastectomy (p < 0.0001). The mean tumour size was smallest in the lumpectomy group (1.9±1.5 cm) compared with 3.6± 3 cm in both unilateral and bilateral mastectomy groups (p < 0.0001). The 20-year cumulative invasive contralateral breast cancer risk was 7.3% for lumpectomy, 7.5% for unilateral mastectomy, and 0.3% for bilateral mastectomy. The 20-year cumulative breast cancer mortality was 13.4% in the lumpectomy group, 30.2% in unilateral mastectomy group and 24.3% in bilateral mastectomy group. However, after adjusting for demographic, clinical, and treatment variables, we observed no difference in breast cancer mortality rates among unilateral mastectomy patients versus lumpectomy patients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94–1.08), and a statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality rates among bilateral mastectomy patients compared to lumpectomy patients (aHR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82–1.00; p value 0.04). Conclusions: In this cohort of invasive lobular breast cancer, bilateral mastectomy patients had a significantly lower risk of contralateral breast cancer and, after adjusting for differences in the surgical treatment groups, had a 10% lower rate of breast cancer mortality as compared to lumpectomy patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.585
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bilateral mastectomy and breast cancer mortality for invasive lobular carcinoma: A SEER-based study.

David W. Lim, Vasily Giannakeas, Richa Jaiswal
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Bilateral mastectomy and breast cancer mortality for invasive lobular carcinoma: A SEER-based study.

David W. Lim, Vasily Giannakeas, Richa Jaiswal
article en

Abstract

585 Background: Many women with unilateral breast cancer opt for bilateral mastectomy. While removing the unaffected contralateral breast lowers the risk of second primary cancers, there is no benefit on breast cancer mortality. Studies have not investigated whether this holds true for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). To estimate the 20-year risk of breast cancer mortality in women with stage I-III unilateral ILC and compare survival outcomes between unilateral lumpectomy, unilateral mastectomy and bilateral mastectomy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify women diagnosed with unilateral invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) between 2000 and 2020. The cohort was followed for up to 20 years to assess contralateral breast cancer and breast cancer-specific survival. We estimated crude mortality rates, 20-year cumulative breast cancer mortality, and hazard ratios by surgical treatment group. Kaplan-Meier was used for cumulative risk, and Cox proportional hazards models for unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: We identified 58,861 women with unilateral ILC. Of which, 34,561 (59%) had lumpectomy, 18,894 (32%) had unilateral mastectomy, and 5406 (9.1%) had bilateral mastectomy. The mean age (in years) was 64 ±11 for unilateral lumpectomy, 62 ±13 for unilateral mastectomy, and 57±11 for bilateral mastectomy (p < 0.0001). The mean tumour size was smallest in the lumpectomy group (1.9±1.5 cm) compared with 3.6± 3 cm in both unilateral and bilateral mastectomy groups (p < 0.0001). The 20-year cumulative invasive contralateral breast cancer risk was 7.3% for lumpectomy, 7.5% for unilateral mastectomy, and 0.3% for bilateral mastectomy. The 20-year cumulative breast cancer mortality was 13.4% in the lumpectomy group, 30.2% in unilateral mastectomy group and 24.3% in bilateral mastectomy group. However, after adjusting for demographic, clinical, and treatment variables, we observed no difference in breast cancer mortality rates among unilateral mastectomy patients versus lumpectomy patients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94–1.08), and a statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality rates among bilateral mastectomy patients compared to lumpectomy patients (aHR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82–1.00; p value 0.04). Conclusions: In this cohort of invasive lobular breast cancer, bilateral mastectomy patients had a significantly lower risk of contralateral breast cancer and, after adjusting for differences in the surgical treatment groups, had a 10% lower rate of breast cancer mortality as compared to lumpectomy patients.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of Toronto (CA), Women's College Hospital (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.