Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute leukemia patients not in complete remission.

6553 Background: Current guidelines support allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with acute leukemia who achieve complete remission (CR) and are at high risk for relapse. Patients with primary refractory disease or those refractory to re-induction therapy after relapse have a poor prognosis without allo-HCT. While several studies have explored the role of allo-HCT in this setting, most have focused on patients receiving myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and have not included contemporary transplant patients or accounted for the impact of molecular genetic risk factors. Consequently, the benefit of allo-HCT in this patient population remains unclear. Methods: This study evaluated the outcomes of patients with acute leukemia from two centers who underwent allo-HCT between 2009 and 2020 while not in CR at the time of transplant, receiving either myeloablative conditioning (MAC) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens. Results: Our cohort included 196 patients who underwent transplantation between 2009 and 2020, with the majority (86%) diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). At 36 months post-transplant, the probability of overall survival (OS) was 24% (95% CI: 19-31). In multivariable analysis, the presence of circulating blasts, recipient CMV seropositivity, and low pre-transplant albumin levels were associated with reduced OS. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 54% (95% CI: 47-61) at 36 months, with the presence of circulating blasts being significantly associated with an increased incidence of relapse. Among AML patients, the presence of at least one high-risk mutation (TP53, RUNX1, ASXL1, or FLT3-ITD, historically considered high-risk per National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN] criteria version 3.2021) was also associated with an increased incidence of relapse. Conclusions: Allo-HCT provides a durable remission in a select group of patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia, with an overall survival of 24% at 36 months. The presence of circulating blasts, CMV seropositivity, and low albumin levels at the time of allo-HCT were associated with increased relapse and inferior OS in this retrospective analysis. The impact of these factors should be further investigated in larger, prospective cohorts to better identify patients with acute leukemia not in CR who would benefit from allo-HSCT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.6553
Primary Topic
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute leukemia patients not in complete remission.

Parveen Shiraz, Lori S. Muffly, Sylvester Homsy, Samantha Brown et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
article

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute leukemia patients not in complete remission.

Parveen Shiraz, Lori S. Muffly, Sylvester Homsy, Samantha Brown, Sushma Bharadwaj, Ann Alice Jakubowski, Moneeza Walji, Melody Smith, Sean M. Devlin, Shlomo Elias, Esperanza B. Papadopoulos, Doris M. Ponce, Boglarka Gyurkocza, Sergio A. Giralt, Ogechukwu Egini, Miguel‐Angel Perales, Arash Velayati, Vanessa E. Kennedy
article en

Abstract

6553 Background: Current guidelines support allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with acute leukemia who achieve complete remission (CR) and are at high risk for relapse. Patients with primary refractory disease or those refractory to re-induction therapy after relapse have a poor prognosis without allo-HCT. While several studies have explored the role of allo-HCT in this setting, most have focused on patients receiving myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and have not included contemporary transplant patients or accounted for the impact of molecular genetic risk factors. Consequently, the benefit of allo-HCT in this patient population remains unclear. Methods: This study evaluated the outcomes of patients with acute leukemia from two centers who underwent allo-HCT between 2009 and 2020 while not in CR at the time of transplant, receiving either myeloablative conditioning (MAC) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens. Results: Our cohort included 196 patients who underwent transplantation between 2009 and 2020, with the majority (86%) diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). At 36 months post-transplant, the probability of overall survival (OS) was 24% (95% CI: 19-31). In multivariable analysis, the presence of circulating blasts, recipient CMV seropositivity, and low pre-transplant albumin levels were associated with reduced OS. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 54% (95% CI: 47-61) at 36 months, with the presence of circulating blasts being significantly associated with an increased incidence of relapse. Among AML patients, the presence of at least one high-risk mutation (TP53, RUNX1, ASXL1, or FLT3-ITD, historically considered high-risk per National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN] criteria version 3.2021) was also associated with an increased incidence of relapse. Conclusions: Allo-HCT provides a durable remission in a select group of patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia, with an overall survival of 24% at 36 months. The presence of circulating blasts, CMV seropositivity, and low albumin levels at the time of allo-HCT were associated with increased relapse and inferior OS in this retrospective analysis. The impact of these factors should be further investigated in larger, prospective cohorts to better identify patients with acute leukemia not in CR who would benefit from allo-HSCT.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Palo Alto University (US), Jerusalem Multidisciplinary College (IL), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Rutgers Cancer Institute (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.