Reframing hormone-positive DCIS management: Effects of adjuvant therapies and surgical extent on any invasive recurrence.

572 Background: The treatment of DCIS is still primarily informed by trials that are now decades old. We have learned since then that only invasive subsequent events, not in situ ones, increase a woman’s risk of eventual metastasis and breast cancer mortality, and may necessitate more aggressive systemic treatment. This suggests a need for the reassessment of the impact of adjuvant therapies. Methods: Women diagnosed with a first breast cancer of unilateral hormone positive DCIS undergoing breast conserving surgery were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program registry. Propensity-matching was performed between treatment groups using age, race, lesion size and grade. Competing risks methods were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of any invasive event at 10 years and subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) were calculated from multivariate models adjusting for the same covariates used for matching. Results: A total of 14,189 patients diagnosed from 2007 to 2011 were eligible for matching, among whom 900 (6.3%) suffered a subsequent invasive event.A cohort was developed by matching from the smallest treatment group, lumpectomy with endocrine therapy. There were 2,996 matched patients, among whom 511 (17.1%) had an invasive subsequent event. Adjuvant endocrine therapy was associated with reduced risk of any invasive event (sHR=0.38, p<0.001) compared to patients undergoing lumpectomy without adjuvant therapy. Radiotherapy alone was not associated with reduced risk (sHR=1.03, p=0.81): it was associated with reduced risk of an ipsilateral invasive event (sHR=0.65, p=0.006) but an increased risk of a contralateral invasive event (sHR=1.50, p=0.01). In subgroup analyses, lumpectomy with radiation therapy was noted to be non-significantly associated with increased risk of any invasive disease in patients younger than 60 years (sHR=1.38, p=0.053) and with decreased risk in patients 60 years or older (sHR=0.79, p=0.12). Conclusions: Our results suggest that endocrine therapy may confer the greatest risk reduction to the development of any subsequent invasive recurrences, and whole-breast radiotherapy may be associated with increased risk for younger women. The risk posed by DCIS as a high-risk marker may outweigh its risk as a premalignant lesion. Any invasive subsequent breast cancer, and subgroup analyses by age. Only treatment effect shown, but results are adjusted for race, grade, age, and lesion size. Any Invasive, Any Age Any Invasive, < 60 years old Any Invasive, ≥ 60 years old sHR (95% CI) p sHR (95% CI) p sHR (95% CI) p Treatment BCS Ref - Ref - Ref - BCS + ET 0.38 (0.29-0.51) <0.001 0.34 (0.21-0.54) <0.001 0.40 (0.28-0.58) <0.001 BCS + RT 1.03 (0.82-1.28) 0.81 1.38 (1.00-1.91) 0.053 0.79 (0.59-1.07) 0.12 sHR = Subdistribution hazard ratio. BCS=Breast conservation surgery. ET=Endocrine therapy. RT=Radiation therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.572
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reframing hormone-positive DCIS management: Effects of adjuvant therapies and surgical extent on any invasive recurrence.

Nicolas D. Prionas, Michael Alvarado, Christina Yau, Thomas J. O’Keefe et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
1.29
article

Reframing hormone-positive DCIS management: Effects of adjuvant therapies and surgical extent on any invasive recurrence.

Nicolas D. Prionas, Michael Alvarado, Christina Yau, Thomas J. O’Keefe, Laura J. Esserman, Gillian L. Hirst, Anne M. Wallace, Sophie Lin, Rita Mukhtar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

572 Background: The treatment of DCIS is still primarily informed by trials that are now decades old. We have learned since then that only invasive subsequent events, not in situ ones, increase a woman’s risk of eventual metastasis and breast cancer mortality, and may necessitate more aggressive systemic treatment. This suggests a need for the reassessment of the impact of adjuvant therapies. Methods: Women diagnosed with a first breast cancer of unilateral hormone positive DCIS undergoing breast conserving surgery were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program registry. Propensity-matching was performed between treatment groups using age, race, lesion size and grade. Competing risks methods were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of any invasive event at 10 years and subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) were calculated from multivariate models adjusting for the same covariates used for matching. Results: A total of 14,189 patients diagnosed from 2007 to 2011 were eligible for matching, among whom 900 (6.3%) suffered a subsequent invasive event.A cohort was developed by matching from the smallest treatment group, lumpectomy with endocrine therapy. There were 2,996 matched patients, among whom 511 (17.1%) had an invasive subsequent event. Adjuvant endocrine therapy was associated with reduced risk of any invasive event (sHR=0.38, p<0.001) compared to patients undergoing lumpectomy without adjuvant therapy. Radiotherapy alone was not associated with reduced risk (sHR=1.03, p=0.81): it was associated with reduced risk of an ipsilateral invasive event (sHR=0.65, p=0.006) but an increased risk of a contralateral invasive event (sHR=1.50, p=0.01). In subgroup analyses, lumpectomy with radiation therapy was noted to be non-significantly associated with increased risk of any invasive disease in patients younger than 60 years (sHR=1.38, p=0.053) and with decreased risk in patients 60 years or older (sHR=0.79, p=0.12). Conclusions: Our results suggest that endocrine therapy may confer the greatest risk reduction to the development of any subsequent invasive recurrences, and whole-breast radiotherapy may be associated with increased risk for younger women. The risk posed by DCIS as a high-risk marker may outweigh its risk as a premalignant lesion. Any invasive subsequent breast cancer, and subgroup analyses by age. Only treatment effect shown, but results are adjusted for race, grade, age, and lesion size. Any Invasive, Any Age Any Invasive, < 60 years old Any Invasive, ≥ 60 years old sHR (95% CI) p sHR (95% CI) p sHR (95% CI) p Treatment BCS Ref - Ref - Ref - BCS + ET 0.38 (0.29-0.51) <0.001 0.34 (0.21-0.54) <0.001 0.40 (0.28-0.58) <0.001 BCS + RT 1.03 (0.82-1.28) 0.81 1.38 (1.00-1.91) 0.053 0.79 (0.59-1.07) 0.12 sHR = Subdistribution hazard ratio. BCS=Breast conservation surgery. ET=Endocrine therapy. RT=Radiation therapy.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of California, San Francisco (US), University of California San Diego (US), UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.