Acute ischemic stroke in prostate cancer patients: Epidemiology, outcomes, and key insights from a national database.

e17002 Background: Cancer patients, including those with prostate cancer (PCA), face an elevated risk of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to mechanisms such as hypercoagulability, cancer treatments like androgen deprivation therapy, and mucin production that might trigger coagulation cascades. This study examines the epidemiology and outcomes of AIS in PCA patients, addressing a critical gap in current literature. Methods: Data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) (2019–2021) were analyzed to identify PCA patients using ICD-10 codes. These patients were stratified by the presence or absence of concurrent AIS. Sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with AIS and those without AIS. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes, including complications, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs, were also analyzed. Multivariate regression analyses were performed using STATA version 18 to assess outcome disparities between the groups, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Among 174,230 PCA hospitalizations, 320 (0.18%) involved AIS. AIS patients were older (71.84 vs. 67.11 years, p < 0.001) and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI > 2: 100% vs. 52.1%, p < 0.001). AIS significantly increased the odds of all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 7.94, 95% CI 3.52–17.90). Patients with AIS also exhibited higher odds of complications, including aspiration pneumonia (aOR 12.74, 95% CI 5.34–30.39), sepsis (aOR 6.29, 95% CI 2.66–14.85), respiratory failure (aOR 4.42, 95% CI 2.20–8.89), shock (aOR 6.53, 95% CI 2.63–16.21), pulmonary embolism (aOR 8.29, 95% CI 2.43–28.36), acute heart failure (aOR 4.89, 95% CI 1.62–14.71), and acute kidney injury (aOR 3.02, 95% CI 1.68–5.42). AIS was associated with a significantly longer hospital stay (11.45 vs. 2.90 days, adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 2.75, 95% CI 2.05–3.69) and higher hospitalization costs ($117,970 vs. $67,548, aIRR 1.72, 95% CI 1.36–2.18). Odds of new-onset seizures and home health care requirements were comparable between groups. Conclusions: PCA patients with concurrent AIS face significantly higher odds of mortality and severe complications, including aspiration pneumonia, sepsis, and respiratory failure. These findings, coupled with prolonged LOS and increased costs, highlight the urgent need for targeted management strategies to improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e17002
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acute ischemic stroke in prostate cancer patients: Epidemiology, outcomes, and key insights from a national database.

Samson Teka, Stephen Roy, Abdu Mohammed, Ibrahim Shanti et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Acute ischemic stroke in prostate cancer patients: Epidemiology, outcomes, and key insights from a national database.

Samson Teka, Stephen Roy, Abdu Mohammed, Ibrahim Shanti, Adamsegd Isac Gebremedhen, Reesha Bodiwala, Mamdouh Souleymane
article en

Abstract

e17002 Background: Cancer patients, including those with prostate cancer (PCA), face an elevated risk of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to mechanisms such as hypercoagulability, cancer treatments like androgen deprivation therapy, and mucin production that might trigger coagulation cascades. This study examines the epidemiology and outcomes of AIS in PCA patients, addressing a critical gap in current literature. Methods: Data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) (2019–2021) were analyzed to identify PCA patients using ICD-10 codes. These patients were stratified by the presence or absence of concurrent AIS. Sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with AIS and those without AIS. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes, including complications, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs, were also analyzed. Multivariate regression analyses were performed using STATA version 18 to assess outcome disparities between the groups, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Among 174,230 PCA hospitalizations, 320 (0.18%) involved AIS. AIS patients were older (71.84 vs. 67.11 years, p < 0.001) and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI > 2: 100% vs. 52.1%, p < 0.001). AIS significantly increased the odds of all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 7.94, 95% CI 3.52–17.90). Patients with AIS also exhibited higher odds of complications, including aspiration pneumonia (aOR 12.74, 95% CI 5.34–30.39), sepsis (aOR 6.29, 95% CI 2.66–14.85), respiratory failure (aOR 4.42, 95% CI 2.20–8.89), shock (aOR 6.53, 95% CI 2.63–16.21), pulmonary embolism (aOR 8.29, 95% CI 2.43–28.36), acute heart failure (aOR 4.89, 95% CI 1.62–14.71), and acute kidney injury (aOR 3.02, 95% CI 1.68–5.42). AIS was associated with a significantly longer hospital stay (11.45 vs. 2.90 days, adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 2.75, 95% CI 2.05–3.69) and higher hospitalization costs ($117,970 vs. $67,548, aIRR 1.72, 95% CI 1.36–2.18). Odds of new-onset seizures and home health care requirements were comparable between groups. Conclusions: PCA patients with concurrent AIS face significantly higher odds of mortality and severe complications, including aspiration pneumonia, sepsis, and respiratory failure. These findings, coupled with prolonged LOS and increased costs, highlight the urgent need for targeted management strategies to improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Trinity Health (US), Marshall University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.