Impact of an early identification model for oncology case management.

e13568 Background: Evidence shows that cancer case management improves patient’s quality-of-life and reduces hospital admissions [1] . When case management (CM) is done by payers, there is a start delay since case managers must wait for the diagnosis information through authorization to start a case. This delay hinders the case manager’s ability to support patients early in their cancer journey as they are making impactful treatment decisions. Researchers at Evernorth Health Services created an Early Identification (EID) machine learning model that allows Evernorth to identify possible breast oncology case management-appropriate patients early. The goal is to shorten the time from diagnosis to engagement in oncology CM. We evaluated how the model impacts CM program metrics. Methods: Implementation of the breast oncology EID program started on April 2022. The list of potential patients identified by the model is sent to case managers on a weekly cadence for outreach and engagement. If the diagnosis is confirmed, they are referred to the oncology care management program. We compared the likelihood of engagement with CM for patients referred to us by the EID model vs. those referred to us by other means (e.g., prior authorization, other case management programs, etc.). We included patients identified by the model between April 2022 and December 2023. We had 3,484 patients in the EID sample and 3,750 in the non-EID initial sample after exclusions. We used Coarsen Exact Matching (CEM) to adjust for demographic, plan type and disease differences between the two groups. In addition, we compared behavioral health integration (measured as having a claim for behavioral health services after engagement in case management) and CM program completion (measured as completing the case goals) for those identified through EID and engaged in CM vs. those engaged in CM and referred to the program through other means. Results: The unadjusted average difference in time from diagnosis to the opening of the oncology CM case is 10 days. The adjusted results show a 21% statistically significant increase in likelihood of engagement for EID identified patients. For engaged patients, the results show a slightly lower rate of CM program completion, but the result is not statistically significant. Finally, EID patients engaged in case management have a 40% statistically significant increase in risk of getting a behavioral health claim after engagement. Conclusions: The Evernorth EID model demonstrates a positive impact on engagement in CM for breast oncology patients as well as a positive impact on behavioral health integration for engaged patients. The model has no significant impact on CM program completion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e13568
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of an early identification model for oncology case management.

J. P. Bhatt, Vicki Smith, Imelda Flores Vazquez, Kristen Feltz et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Impact of an early identification model for oncology case management.

J. P. Bhatt, Vicki Smith, Imelda Flores Vazquez, Kristen Feltz, Dylan Dittrich-Reed, Tina Lala, Daniel Greden
article en

Abstract

e13568 Background: Evidence shows that cancer case management improves patient’s quality-of-life and reduces hospital admissions [1] . When case management (CM) is done by payers, there is a start delay since case managers must wait for the diagnosis information through authorization to start a case. This delay hinders the case manager’s ability to support patients early in their cancer journey as they are making impactful treatment decisions. Researchers at Evernorth Health Services created an Early Identification (EID) machine learning model that allows Evernorth to identify possible breast oncology case management-appropriate patients early. The goal is to shorten the time from diagnosis to engagement in oncology CM. We evaluated how the model impacts CM program metrics. Methods: Implementation of the breast oncology EID program started on April 2022. The list of potential patients identified by the model is sent to case managers on a weekly cadence for outreach and engagement. If the diagnosis is confirmed, they are referred to the oncology care management program. We compared the likelihood of engagement with CM for patients referred to us by the EID model vs. those referred to us by other means (e.g., prior authorization, other case management programs, etc.). We included patients identified by the model between April 2022 and December 2023. We had 3,484 patients in the EID sample and 3,750 in the non-EID initial sample after exclusions. We used Coarsen Exact Matching (CEM) to adjust for demographic, plan type and disease differences between the two groups. In addition, we compared behavioral health integration (measured as having a claim for behavioral health services after engagement in case management) and CM program completion (measured as completing the case goals) for those identified through EID and engaged in CM vs. those engaged in CM and referred to the program through other means. Results: The unadjusted average difference in time from diagnosis to the opening of the oncology CM case is 10 days. The adjusted results show a 21% statistically significant increase in likelihood of engagement for EID identified patients. For engaged patients, the results show a slightly lower rate of CM program completion, but the result is not statistically significant. Finally, EID patients engaged in case management have a 40% statistically significant increase in risk of getting a behavioral health claim after engagement. Conclusions: The Evernorth EID model demonstrates a positive impact on engagement in CM for breast oncology patients as well as a positive impact on behavioral health integration for engaged patients. The model has no significant impact on CM program completion.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Cigna (United States) (US), Hartford Financial Services (United States)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.