Tackling the high economic impact of recurrence in resected Medicare patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.

e13581 Background: Patients with resected triple negative breast cancer who experience recurrence have poorer survival outcomes, but the economic impact of recurrence is not well understood. This study assessed the additional healthcare resource use and costs associated with recurrence in Medicare patients with resected triple negative breast cancer. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry data linked with CMS Medicare claims. Eligible patients were aged 50 and older, with newly diagnosed triple negative breast cancer stages IB to IIIA (AJCC Staging Manual, 9th edition) and surgery between January 2015 and December 2019. Continuous enrollment criteria were applied to ensure complete data capture. Per patient per month (PPPM) healthcare utilization and all-cause direct costs were compared between patients with and without recurrence, identified through diagnosis, procedure, or drug codes. Patients were matched (1:1) by cancer stage and treatment, with additional matching on other characteristics using propensity scores. Results: Of the 5,673 patients, 2,610 (46%) had recurrence. After matching, each cohort included 1,600 patients. Those with recurrence had significantly higher healthcare utilization, including inpatient visits (+0.37 PPPM), outpatient visits (+2.25 PPPM), physician services (+4.70 PPPM), and emergency department visits (+0.67 PPPM; all p < 0.001). The average follow-up cost per patient per month (PPPM) was $8,893 for the recurrence cohort and $2,521 for the no-recurrence cohort, resulting in a $6,372 PPPM difference (p < 0.001), with inpatient costs being the largest contributor. Conclusions: In a real-world population, recurrence in patients with resected triple negative breast cancer is strongly linked to higher healthcare resource utilization and significantly increased costs. This underscores the need for prospective study design and we are addressing a global analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e13581
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tackling the high economic impact of recurrence in resected Medicare patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.

Ragisha Gopalakrishnan, D. Chen, Vivek Narayanan
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Tackling the high economic impact of recurrence in resected Medicare patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.

Ragisha Gopalakrishnan, D. Chen, Vivek Narayanan
article en

Abstract

e13581 Background: Patients with resected triple negative breast cancer who experience recurrence have poorer survival outcomes, but the economic impact of recurrence is not well understood. This study assessed the additional healthcare resource use and costs associated with recurrence in Medicare patients with resected triple negative breast cancer. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry data linked with CMS Medicare claims. Eligible patients were aged 50 and older, with newly diagnosed triple negative breast cancer stages IB to IIIA (AJCC Staging Manual, 9th edition) and surgery between January 2015 and December 2019. Continuous enrollment criteria were applied to ensure complete data capture. Per patient per month (PPPM) healthcare utilization and all-cause direct costs were compared between patients with and without recurrence, identified through diagnosis, procedure, or drug codes. Patients were matched (1:1) by cancer stage and treatment, with additional matching on other characteristics using propensity scores. Results: Of the 5,673 patients, 2,610 (46%) had recurrence. After matching, each cohort included 1,600 patients. Those with recurrence had significantly higher healthcare utilization, including inpatient visits (+0.37 PPPM), outpatient visits (+2.25 PPPM), physician services (+4.70 PPPM), and emergency department visits (+0.67 PPPM; all p < 0.001). The average follow-up cost per patient per month (PPPM) was $8,893 for the recurrence cohort and $2,521 for the no-recurrence cohort, resulting in a $6,372 PPPM difference (p < 0.001), with inpatient costs being the largest contributor. Conclusions: In a real-world population, recurrence in patients with resected triple negative breast cancer is strongly linked to higher healthcare resource utilization and significantly increased costs. This underscores the need for prospective study design and we are addressing a global analysis.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Lahey Medical Center (US), Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.