Advancing pain and symptom management in cancer: A data-driven analysis of care delivery, psychosocial support, and communication strategies.

e13588 Background: Effective pain and symptom management is critical in cancer care, yet gaps exist in addressing psychosocial needs and communication strategies. Non-pharmacological interventions, psychosocial support, and innovative care models have shown promise, but comprehensive, data-driven analysis is lacking, especially regarding underrepresented demographics. Methods: A systematic analysis was conducted using data from ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to identify studies published from 2020 to 2025 focused on pain management, psychosocial support, and communication strategies in cancer care. Outcomes analyzed include pain severity, emotional well-being, adherence, and patient satisfaction. The study also examined demographic representation, with a focus on age and ethnicity. Results: From 180 relevant studies, 40% incorporated non-pharmacological interventions (e.g., CBT, mindfulness). Psychosocial support (peer support, therapy) appeared in 30%, and 25% explored communication strategies (decision-making, symptom communication). Key findings include: Non-pharmacological interventions reduced pain severity by 35% (p < 0.01) and improved emotional well-being by 30% (p < 0.05). Psychosocial support reduced perceived stress by 40% (p < 0.001) and depressive symptoms by 25% (p < 0.05). Innovative care models, particularly telehealth, improved adherence by 50% (p < 0.001) and patient-care team communication by 45% (p < 0.01). Demographic analysis revealed underrepresentation: only 15% of trials included participants over 65 years, and 20% focused on racial/ethnic minorities. Conclusions: Psychosocial support, communication strategies, and non-pharmacological interventions enhance pain management and emotional well-being in cancer patients. Innovative care models like telehealth improve adherence and communication. However, underrepresentation of older adults and minorities in research limits the generalizability of these findings. Future research should prioritize inclusive recruitment strategies, explore the synergistic effects of combined interventions, and evaluate long-term outcomes to ensure equitable and effective care for all cancer patients. Intervention Type Studies (%) Pain Reduction (%) Emotional Improvement (%) Adherence (%) Patient Satisfaction (%) Non-pharmacological (CBT, mindfulness) 40% 35 30 N/A 85 Psychosocial Support (therapy, peer) 30% 15 40 N/A 80 Communication (decision-making) 25% 10 25 45 70 Innovative Care (telehealth) 25% 12 10 50 75

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e13588
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing pain and symptom management in cancer: A data-driven analysis of care delivery, psychosocial support, and communication strategies.

Arshia Adib, Akshit Chitkara, Rushin Patel, Fnu Anamika et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Advancing pain and symptom management in cancer: A data-driven analysis of care delivery, psychosocial support, and communication strategies.

Arshia Adib, Akshit Chitkara, Rushin Patel, Fnu Anamika, Nikhil Vojjala, Ujjwal Soni, Sakshi Bai
article en

Abstract

e13588 Background: Effective pain and symptom management is critical in cancer care, yet gaps exist in addressing psychosocial needs and communication strategies. Non-pharmacological interventions, psychosocial support, and innovative care models have shown promise, but comprehensive, data-driven analysis is lacking, especially regarding underrepresented demographics. Methods: A systematic analysis was conducted using data from ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to identify studies published from 2020 to 2025 focused on pain management, psychosocial support, and communication strategies in cancer care. Outcomes analyzed include pain severity, emotional well-being, adherence, and patient satisfaction. The study also examined demographic representation, with a focus on age and ethnicity. Results: From 180 relevant studies, 40% incorporated non-pharmacological interventions (e.g., CBT, mindfulness). Psychosocial support (peer support, therapy) appeared in 30%, and 25% explored communication strategies (decision-making, symptom communication). Key findings include: Non-pharmacological interventions reduced pain severity by 35% (p < 0.01) and improved emotional well-being by 30% (p < 0.05). Psychosocial support reduced perceived stress by 40% (p < 0.001) and depressive symptoms by 25% (p < 0.05). Innovative care models, particularly telehealth, improved adherence by 50% (p < 0.001) and patient-care team communication by 45% (p < 0.01). Demographic analysis revealed underrepresentation: only 15% of trials included participants over 65 years, and 20% focused on racial/ethnic minorities. Conclusions: Psychosocial support, communication strategies, and non-pharmacological interventions enhance pain management and emotional well-being in cancer patients. Innovative care models like telehealth improve adherence and communication. However, underrepresentation of older adults and minorities in research limits the generalizability of these findings. Future research should prioritize inclusive recruitment strategies, explore the synergistic effects of combined interventions, and evaluate long-term outcomes to ensure equitable and effective care for all cancer patients. Intervention Type Studies (%) Pain Reduction (%) Emotional Improvement (%) Adherence (%) Patient Satisfaction (%) Non-pharmacological (CBT, mindfulness) 40% 35 30 N/A 85 Psychosocial Support (therapy, peer) 30% 15 40 N/A 80 Communication (decision-making) 25% 10 25 45 70 Innovative Care (telehealth) 25% 12 10 50 75

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Thomas Jefferson University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Lenox Hill Hospital (US), Jackson Memorial Hospital (US), University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.