Telemedicine-enabled synchronous medical oncology and home hospice visits.

12100 Background: Hospice is underutilized at end-of-life by patients with cancer. Among the barriers to earlier acceptance of hospice may be the perceived loss of the therapeutic alliance and emotional support provided by the oncology team once the hospice team starts care. With the growing utilization of telemedicine, we sought to understand patient, caregiver, hospice nurse, and oncologist perceptions of synchronizing home hospice visits by the hospice nurse with remote telemedicine visits performed by the oncologist in their clinic. Methods: Thirty-four newly enrolled hospice patients (age 57-90+; 20 female & 14 male; 28 white non-Hispanic,1 white Hispanic, 3 black/African American, 2 other; 19 married, 3 single, 3 divorced, 1 significant other, 7 widowed, 1 other) and 34 caregivers were consented to an IRB-approved study between 5/14/21-9/9/24. Home hospice nurse visits were coordinated with the oncologist’s clinic schedule and telemedicine visits were securely conducted through Epic MyChart functionality. Mixed methodology was utilized with patients, caregivers, hospice nurses and oncologists completing five-point Likert-scale surveys at baseline and subsequent serial surveys for patients and caregivers. Results: All groups rated improvement in overall communication. Likert scores for ease and quality of communication improved for oncologists (3.0 to 1.5) and nurses (2.0 to 1.0). Therapeutic alliance scores for patients and caregivers were stable and improved for oncologists (2.5 to 1.5) and nurses (2.0 to 1.5). Conclusions: Patients and caregivers expressed highly favorable ratings of hospice experience at baseline and improvement with telemedicine visits. There was no degradation in patient and caregiver therapeutic alliance scores, suggesting preservation of patient experience. Improvement among oncologists and hospice nurses was seen for both communication and therapeutic alliance scores once synchronous telemedicine hospice visits were instituted. These findings suggest that all four groups found value in oncologist-hospice patient telemedicine visits. Qualitative interviews and thematic analysis of caregivers’ impressions of the program continue to identify how better to support patients and caregivers during home hospice care. Quantitative results. Baseline Score Improvement in Score Median (IQR) Median (IQR) Patient Communication Overall 2.0 (1.25-2.75) 1.0 (0.5-1.0) Therapeutic Alliance Support received from oncologist 2.0 (1-3) 0.0 (-0.5-2.5) Caregiver Communication Overall 2.0 (1.75-3) 1.0 (0.0-1.0) Therapeutic Alliance Support received from oncologist 1.0 (1-3) 0.0 (0.0-0.0) Oncologist Communication Overall 3.0 (2-4.75) 2.0 (0.0-3.0) Therapeutic Alliance Connection 2.5 (2.0-3.0) 1.0 (0.0-2.0) Hospice Nurse Communication Overall 2.0 (2-2.75) 1.0 (0.0-1.0) Therapeutic Alliance Connection with patient & family 2.0 (1-2) 0.5 (0.0-1.0) IQR – interquartile range.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.12100
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Telemedicine-enabled synchronous medical oncology and home hospice visits.

Todd J. Alekshun, Mary Kate Eanniello, Evan Fox, Sara Dost et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Telemedicine-enabled synchronous medical oncology and home hospice visits.

Todd J. Alekshun, Mary Kate Eanniello, Evan Fox, Sara Dost, Ross H. Albert, Sui Ping Suen, Andrew S. Epstein, Peter Paul Yu, Alvaro G. Menendez, P E Schwartz, Jeanne Bodyk
article en

Abstract

12100 Background: Hospice is underutilized at end-of-life by patients with cancer. Among the barriers to earlier acceptance of hospice may be the perceived loss of the therapeutic alliance and emotional support provided by the oncology team once the hospice team starts care. With the growing utilization of telemedicine, we sought to understand patient, caregiver, hospice nurse, and oncologist perceptions of synchronizing home hospice visits by the hospice nurse with remote telemedicine visits performed by the oncologist in their clinic. Methods: Thirty-four newly enrolled hospice patients (age 57-90+; 20 female & 14 male; 28 white non-Hispanic,1 white Hispanic, 3 black/African American, 2 other; 19 married, 3 single, 3 divorced, 1 significant other, 7 widowed, 1 other) and 34 caregivers were consented to an IRB-approved study between 5/14/21-9/9/24. Home hospice nurse visits were coordinated with the oncologist’s clinic schedule and telemedicine visits were securely conducted through Epic MyChart functionality. Mixed methodology was utilized with patients, caregivers, hospice nurses and oncologists completing five-point Likert-scale surveys at baseline and subsequent serial surveys for patients and caregivers. Results: All groups rated improvement in overall communication. Likert scores for ease and quality of communication improved for oncologists (3.0 to 1.5) and nurses (2.0 to 1.0). Therapeutic alliance scores for patients and caregivers were stable and improved for oncologists (2.5 to 1.5) and nurses (2.0 to 1.5). Conclusions: Patients and caregivers expressed highly favorable ratings of hospice experience at baseline and improvement with telemedicine visits. There was no degradation in patient and caregiver therapeutic alliance scores, suggesting preservation of patient experience. Improvement among oncologists and hospice nurses was seen for both communication and therapeutic alliance scores once synchronous telemedicine hospice visits were instituted. These findings suggest that all four groups found value in oncologist-hospice patient telemedicine visits. Qualitative interviews and thematic analysis of caregivers’ impressions of the program continue to identify how better to support patients and caregivers during home hospice care. Quantitative results. Baseline Score Improvement in Score Median (IQR) Median (IQR) Patient Communication Overall 2.0 (1.25-2.75) 1.0 (0.5-1.0) Therapeutic Alliance Support received from oncologist 2.0 (1-3) 0.0 (-0.5-2.5) Caregiver Communication Overall 2.0 (1.75-3) 1.0 (0.0-1.0) Therapeutic Alliance Support received from oncologist 1.0 (1-3) 0.0 (0.0-0.0) Oncologist Communication Overall 3.0 (2-4.75) 2.0 (0.0-3.0) Therapeutic Alliance Connection 2.5 (2.0-3.0) 1.0 (0.0-2.0) Hospice Nurse Communication Overall 2.0 (2-2.75) 1.0 (0.0-1.0) Therapeutic Alliance Connection with patient & family 2.0 (1-2) 0.5 (0.0-1.0) IQR – interquartile range.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Hartford Hospital (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Hartford Financial Services (United States)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.