Use of a large language model (LLM) for pan-cancer automated detection of anti-cancer therapy toxicities and translational toxicity research.

1558 Background: Understanding why patients develop adverse events to anti-cancer therapies and predicting the occurrence of these toxicities has lagged behind tumor response biomarker development. This critical gap is primarily due to limited availability of large-scale curated toxicity data. Here, we leverage advances in natural language processing ( Jee J et al., Nature, 2024 ), pooled clinical trial data, and associated germline sequencing to detect adverse event data and determine clinical and genomic correlates. Methods: We utilized the Llama 3.1 LLM to automatically annotate patient adverse event data for 5 of the most common anti-cancer therapy related adverse events (adrenal insufficiency, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, colitis, and pneumonitis). To validate LLM predictions at the patient-level, we used a pooled institutional dataset with gold standard prospectively collected adverse event data from 1,754 patients with solid tumors across 675 individual clinical trials. We further validated the LLM predictions at the clinical note-level using a subset of 100 manually curated notes. We evaluated note-level and patient-level predictions using sensitivity and specificity. Patient-level time-to-adverse event development predictions were evaluated using Pearson R 2 coefficients. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0 was used for toxicity definitions. Results: The patients’ average age (standard deviation) was 61.6 (14.5) years and 836 (47.7%) were female. The most common cancers were non-small cell lung cancer (N= 194, 11.1%), soft tissue sarcoma (N=171, 9.7%), breast cancer (N= 155, 8.8%), and melanoma (N=129, 7.4%). 44 (2.5%) patients had adrenal insufficiency, 88 colitis (5.0%), 253 hypothyroidism (14.4%), 66 hyperthyroidism (4.4%), and 146 pneumonitis (8.3%). Among 1258 patients with complete systemic therapy information available, 422 (33.5%) were treated with immunotherapy and 563 (44.8%) with chemotherapy. The performance metrics for LLM predictions at the note and patient levels are summarized in the table. Conclusions: We demonstrate the ability of an LLM to accurately annotate anti-cancer therapy toxicity data across a large number of patients. This approach is scalable to other toxicities and promises to spur adverse event research. Clinical and genomic correlates of anti-cancer therapy adverse events, using data from all patients with solid tumors with MSK-IMPACT data, will also be presented at the meeting. Performance metrics for LLM model. Toxicity Note-level (N= 100 notes) Patient-level (N= 1,754 patients) Sensitivity Specificity Sensitivity Specificity R 2 Adrenal insufficiency 100.0% 97.8% 97.7% 94.7% 98.2% Colitis 66.7% 99.0% 94.3% 80.4% 89.2% Hyperthyroidism 57.1% 100.0% 74.0% 91.4% 98.7% Hypothyroidism 100.0% 88.9% 88.1% 74.0% 96.1% Pneumonitis 76.9% 97.7% 98.6% 70.1% 83.9%

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.1558
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of a large language model (LLM) for pan-cancer automated detection of anti-cancer therapy toxicities and translational toxicity research.

Karl Pichotta, Adam J. Schoenfeld, Chenlian Fu, Mark Jeng et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
1.50
article

Use of a large language model (LLM) for pan-cancer automated detection of anti-cancer therapy toxicities and translational toxicity research.

Karl Pichotta, Adam J. Schoenfeld, Chenlian Fu, Mark Jeng, Tomin Perea-Chamblee, Eduard Reznik, Ziad Bakouny, Jian Carrot‐Zhang, Nikolaus Schultz, Mindy Lee, Chris Fong, Charles A. Marotta, Neil J. Shah, Justin Jee, Robert John Motzer, Michele Waters, Afsana Rahman, Nishat Ahmed, Craig B. Thompson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

1558 Background: Understanding why patients develop adverse events to anti-cancer therapies and predicting the occurrence of these toxicities has lagged behind tumor response biomarker development. This critical gap is primarily due to limited availability of large-scale curated toxicity data. Here, we leverage advances in natural language processing ( Jee J et al., Nature, 2024 ), pooled clinical trial data, and associated germline sequencing to detect adverse event data and determine clinical and genomic correlates. Methods: We utilized the Llama 3.1 LLM to automatically annotate patient adverse event data for 5 of the most common anti-cancer therapy related adverse events (adrenal insufficiency, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, colitis, and pneumonitis). To validate LLM predictions at the patient-level, we used a pooled institutional dataset with gold standard prospectively collected adverse event data from 1,754 patients with solid tumors across 675 individual clinical trials. We further validated the LLM predictions at the clinical note-level using a subset of 100 manually curated notes. We evaluated note-level and patient-level predictions using sensitivity and specificity. Patient-level time-to-adverse event development predictions were evaluated using Pearson R 2 coefficients. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0 was used for toxicity definitions. Results: The patients’ average age (standard deviation) was 61.6 (14.5) years and 836 (47.7%) were female. The most common cancers were non-small cell lung cancer (N= 194, 11.1%), soft tissue sarcoma (N=171, 9.7%), breast cancer (N= 155, 8.8%), and melanoma (N=129, 7.4%). 44 (2.5%) patients had adrenal insufficiency, 88 colitis (5.0%), 253 hypothyroidism (14.4%), 66 hyperthyroidism (4.4%), and 146 pneumonitis (8.3%). Among 1258 patients with complete systemic therapy information available, 422 (33.5%) were treated with immunotherapy and 563 (44.8%) with chemotherapy. The performance metrics for LLM predictions at the note and patient levels are summarized in the table. Conclusions: We demonstrate the ability of an LLM to accurately annotate anti-cancer therapy toxicity data across a large number of patients. This approach is scalable to other toxicities and promises to spur adverse event research. Clinical and genomic correlates of anti-cancer therapy adverse events, using data from all patients with solid tumors with MSK-IMPACT data, will also be presented at the meeting. Performance metrics for LLM model. Toxicity Note-level (N= 100 notes) Patient-level (N= 1,754 patients) Sensitivity Specificity Sensitivity Specificity R 2 Adrenal insufficiency 100.0% 97.8% 97.7% 94.7% 98.2% Colitis 66.7% 99.0% 94.3% 80.4% 89.2% Hyperthyroidism 57.1% 100.0% 74.0% 91.4% 98.7% Hypothyroidism 100.0% 88.9% 88.1% 74.0% 96.1% Pneumonitis 76.9% 97.7% 98.6% 70.1% 83.9%

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
1.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.