Evaluation of longitudinal image-derived AI prognostication as a predictor of overall survival (OS) in a phase 3 advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) trial.

1552 Background: Confidently anticipating an overall survival (OS) benefit in cancer care and therapeutic research is a defining challenge. AI tools may offer longitudinal measurements that predict OS differences objectively from existing data. Longitudinal imaging-based prognostication (IPRO-Δ), a fully automated deep learning system, was independently trained on real-world imaging data to predict survival from pairs of longitudinal computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: We retrospectively assessed and compared how IPRO-Δ and percent change in RECIST sum of longest diameters (ΔSLD) predicted OS from 165 pairs of baseline and week 13 CT scans acquired in NExUS (NCT00449033), a phase 3 randomized controlled trial evaluating chemotherapy in combination with either sorafenib or placebo for first-line treatment of subjects with aNSCLC. The two study arms did not show a difference in OS and were combined for this analysis. To examine the association of IPRO-Δ and ΔSLD with OS, we measured the concordance index (c-index) and the standardized hazard ratios (HRs, change in risk for a one-standard-deviation increase in the marker). We also report median OS (mOS) for patients with partial response (PR, n = 60), stable disease (SD, n = 83) and progressive disease (PD, n = 22) at week 13, as defined by RECIST 1.1 guidelines (zero patients had a complete response). To explore the stratification potential of IPRO-Δ, we also define equivalent strata by ordering patients by their IPRO-Δ score and maintaining the same proportions (e.g., the top 60 patients by IPRO-Δ would be IPRO-PR, while the bottom 22 patients would be IPRO-PD), and report the mOS for these strata. Results: For the combined trial arms, median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI: 8.6 – 13.6), 108 (65.4%) were male, and 145 (87.9%) were diagnosed as stage IV. Table 1 reports the c-index, HR and stratified mOS values for both survival markers. Conclusions: At week 13 in NExUS, IPRO-Δ predicted OS differences significantly better than ΔSLD. Future work will explore how IPRO-Δ could serve as the basis for a surrogate endpoint in aNSCLC trials. Summary of association of IPRO-Δ and ΔSLD with OS. IPRO-Δ @ Week 13 (95% CI) ΔSLD @ Week 13 (95% CI) p -value C-Index 0.654 (0.604 – 0.713) 0.543 (0.495 – 0.599) <0.01 HR (1SD) 1.72 (1.38 – 2.15) 1.14 (0.94 – 1.38) <0.01 OS (months, PR / SD / PD or IPRO equivalent) 16.5 / 10.9 / 5.7 12.5 / 12.3 / 4.6 -

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.1552
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of longitudinal image-derived AI prognostication as a predictor of overall survival (OS) in a phase 3 advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) trial.

Omar Khan, T. P. J. Hennessy, Vignesh Sivan, Shahid A. Haider et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Evaluation of longitudinal image-derived AI prognostication as a predictor of overall survival (OS) in a phase 3 advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) trial.

Omar Khan, T. P. J. Hennessy, Vignesh Sivan, Shahid A. Haider, Charles Glaus, Oleksandra Samorodova, Emmanuelle DiTomaso, Javier Montalt‐Tordera, T. Banerji, Sadegh Mohammadi, Felix Baldauf-Lenschen, J. Riskas
article en

Abstract

1552 Background: Confidently anticipating an overall survival (OS) benefit in cancer care and therapeutic research is a defining challenge. AI tools may offer longitudinal measurements that predict OS differences objectively from existing data. Longitudinal imaging-based prognostication (IPRO-Δ), a fully automated deep learning system, was independently trained on real-world imaging data to predict survival from pairs of longitudinal computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: We retrospectively assessed and compared how IPRO-Δ and percent change in RECIST sum of longest diameters (ΔSLD) predicted OS from 165 pairs of baseline and week 13 CT scans acquired in NExUS (NCT00449033), a phase 3 randomized controlled trial evaluating chemotherapy in combination with either sorafenib or placebo for first-line treatment of subjects with aNSCLC. The two study arms did not show a difference in OS and were combined for this analysis. To examine the association of IPRO-Δ and ΔSLD with OS, we measured the concordance index (c-index) and the standardized hazard ratios (HRs, change in risk for a one-standard-deviation increase in the marker). We also report median OS (mOS) for patients with partial response (PR, n = 60), stable disease (SD, n = 83) and progressive disease (PD, n = 22) at week 13, as defined by RECIST 1.1 guidelines (zero patients had a complete response). To explore the stratification potential of IPRO-Δ, we also define equivalent strata by ordering patients by their IPRO-Δ score and maintaining the same proportions (e.g., the top 60 patients by IPRO-Δ would be IPRO-PR, while the bottom 22 patients would be IPRO-PD), and report the mOS for these strata. Results: For the combined trial arms, median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI: 8.6 – 13.6), 108 (65.4%) were male, and 145 (87.9%) were diagnosed as stage IV. Table 1 reports the c-index, HR and stratified mOS values for both survival markers. Conclusions: At week 13 in NExUS, IPRO-Δ predicted OS differences significantly better than ΔSLD. Future work will explore how IPRO-Δ could serve as the basis for a surrogate endpoint in aNSCLC trials. Summary of association of IPRO-Δ and ΔSLD with OS. IPRO-Δ @ Week 13 (95% CI) ΔSLD @ Week 13 (95% CI) p -value C-Index 0.654 (0.604 – 0.713) 0.543 (0.495 – 0.599) <0.01 HR (1SD) 1.72 (1.38 – 2.15) 1.14 (0.94 – 1.38) <0.01 OS (months, PR / SD / PD or IPRO equivalent) 16.5 / 10.9 / 5.7 12.5 / 12.3 / 4.6 -

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Bayer (United States) (US), University of Calgary (CA), Bayer (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.