Perceptions, attitudes, and concerns about artificial intelligence applications in patients with cancer.

e13626 Background: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in oncology has increased rapidly, spanning applications such as pathology, radiology, diagnostics, prognosis, genomics, treatment planning, and clinical trials. However, perspectives, comfort levels, and concerns about AI in cancer care remain largely unexplored. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional survey study was conducted between May 20 and October 22, 2024, among 363 patients with cancer from two different hospitals affiliated with Ankara University, a tertiary care center in Turkey. Results: A majority believed AI would somewhat (32%) or significantly (18.7%) improve healthcare. One-third (33.1%) felt very uncomfortable with AI diagnosing cancer, with higher discomfort among less-educated participants (p &lt; 0.005). Concerns included incorrect diagnoses (31.1%), healthcare costs (27.5%), and data privacy (19.6%). Patients with higher education levels expressed less discomfort and fewer concerns. Conclusions: Patients' perspectives on AI varied significantly based on education, highlighting the need for targeted educational initiatives. While AI holds potential to revolutionize cancer care, addressing concerns about accuracy, security, and transparency is critical to enhance its acceptance and effectiveness in clinical practice. Cancer patients' concerns with artificial intelligence in healthcare. Question -Response Total (n=363) (%) Gender p-value Age p-value Education p-value Male (n=187)(%) Female (n=176)(%) 18–64 y(n=218)(%) ≥65 y (n=139)(%) Primary(n=191) (%) High School (n=72) (%) University (n=72)(%) Postgraduate(n=26)(%) 1. How concerned you are about the use of AI in medicine for each of the following My health information will not be kept confidential Not concerned 122 (33.6) 69 (36.9) 53 (30.1) X0.158 75 (34.4) 46 (33.1) 00.123 57 (29.8) 25 (34.7) 31 (43.1) 9 (34.6) 0.484 Somewhat concerned 170 (46.8) 88 (47.1) 82 (46.6) 93 (42.7) 72 (51.8) 94 (49.2) 32 (44.4) 28 (38.9) 14 (53.8) Very concerned 71 (19.6) 30 (16) 41 (23.3) 50 (22.9) 21 (15.1) 40 (20.9) 15 (20.8) 13 (18.1) 3 (11.5) The AI will make the wrong diagnosis Not concerned 65 (17.9) 35 (18.7) 30 (17) X0.496 39 (17.9) 25 (18) X0.031 31 (16.2) 16 (22.2) 13 (18.1) 5 (19.2) 0.086 Somewhat concerned 183 (50.4) 98 (52.4) 85 (48.3) 98 (45) 80 (57.6) 91 (47.6) 31 (43.1) 42 (58.3) 18 (69.2) Very concerned 115 (31.7) 54 (28.9) 61 (34.7) 81 (37.2) 34 (24.5) 69 (36.1) 25 (34.7) 17 (23.6) 3 (11.5) AI will mean I spend less time with my doctor Not concerned <jats:td colspan="1

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e13626
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions, attitudes, and concerns about artificial intelligence applications in patients with cancer.

Enes Erul, Yüksel Ürün, Emre Yekedüz, Yusuf Aktekin et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Perceptions, attitudes, and concerns about artificial intelligence applications in patients with cancer.

Enes Erul, Yüksel Ürün, Emre Yekedüz, Yusuf Aktekin, Şükrü Armanç Gümüştaş, Büşra Saraç Aktekin
article en

Abstract

e13626 Background: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in oncology has increased rapidly, spanning applications such as pathology, radiology, diagnostics, prognosis, genomics, treatment planning, and clinical trials. However, perspectives, comfort levels, and concerns about AI in cancer care remain largely unexplored. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional survey study was conducted between May 20 and October 22, 2024, among 363 patients with cancer from two different hospitals affiliated with Ankara University, a tertiary care center in Turkey. Results: A majority believed AI would somewhat (32%) or significantly (18.7%) improve healthcare. One-third (33.1%) felt very uncomfortable with AI diagnosing cancer, with higher discomfort among less-educated participants (p &lt; 0.005). Concerns included incorrect diagnoses (31.1%), healthcare costs (27.5%), and data privacy (19.6%). Patients with higher education levels expressed less discomfort and fewer concerns. Conclusions: Patients' perspectives on AI varied significantly based on education, highlighting the need for targeted educational initiatives. While AI holds potential to revolutionize cancer care, addressing concerns about accuracy, security, and transparency is critical to enhance its acceptance and effectiveness in clinical practice. Cancer patients' concerns with artificial intelligence in healthcare. Question -Response Total (n=363) (%) Gender p-value Age p-value Education p-value Male (n=187)(%) Female (n=176)(%) 18–64 y(n=218)(%) ≥65 y (n=139)(%) Primary(n=191) (%) High School (n=72) (%) University (n=72)(%) Postgraduate(n=26)(%) 1. How concerned you are about the use of AI in medicine for each of the following My health information will not be kept confidential Not concerned 122 (33.6) 69 (36.9) 53 (30.1) X0.158 75 (34.4) 46 (33.1) 00.123 57 (29.8) 25 (34.7) 31 (43.1) 9 (34.6) 0.484 Somewhat concerned 170 (46.8) 88 (47.1) 82 (46.6) 93 (42.7) 72 (51.8) 94 (49.2) 32 (44.4) 28 (38.9) 14 (53.8) Very concerned 71 (19.6) 30 (16) 41 (23.3) 50 (22.9) 21 (15.1) 40 (20.9) 15 (20.8) 13 (18.1) 3 (11.5) The AI will make the wrong diagnosis Not concerned 65 (17.9) 35 (18.7) 30 (17) X0.496 39 (17.9) 25 (18) X0.031 31 (16.2) 16 (22.2) 13 (18.1) 5 (19.2) 0.086 Somewhat concerned 183 (50.4) 98 (52.4) 85 (48.3) 98 (45) 80 (57.6) 91 (47.6) 31 (43.1) 42 (58.3) 18 (69.2) Very concerned 115 (31.7) 54 (28.9) 61 (34.7) 81 (37.2) 34 (24.5) 69 (36.1) 25 (34.7) 17 (23.6) 3 (11.5) AI will mean I spend less time with my doctor Not concerned <jats:td colspan="1

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Ankara University (TR), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.