Impact of cancer related fatigue on quality of life of 1,262 patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy: A URCC NCORP nationwide phase III RCT.

12130 Background: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms reported by cancer patients, significantly impairing quality of life (QoL) across physical, functional, emotional, and social domains. Despite its prevalence, limited data exist quantifying how rapid changes in CRF after a single chemotherapy cycle influence QoL. We aim to evaluate if rapid clinically meaningful changes in CRF post chemotherapy impact QoL in breast cancer patients. Methods: This Phase III RCT (NCT03367572) enrolled chemotherapy-naïve breast cancer patients across 21 NCORP practices receiving high/moderate emetogenic chemotherapy. CRF was assessed at baseline and post chemotherapy cycle 1 (n = 1,262) using a four-day home diary, with maximum fatigue change as the primary outcome. For analysis, the CRF variable was dichotomized into two categories: a clinically significant increase (≥3 points) and less than a 3-point increase. QOL was measured with FACT-G and its subscales: emotional (EWB), functional (FWB), physical (PWB), and social (SWB). ANCOVA and Cohen’s d effect size (ES) evaluated whether clinically meaningful CRF changes predicted QOL changes across cycles. Results: Among 1,262 patients with valid fatigue scores, 74.8% experienced increased CRF after cycle 1, with 53.2% reporting a ≥3-point increase and a mean increase of 2.9 points for the group. Clinically significant increases in CRF strongly impacted quality of life (QOL), as reflected in FACT-G Total Score changes post-cycle 1 (≥3: −12.4 vs < 3: −4.7; mean difference: 7.7, p < 0.001, ES: 0.74), exceeding the clinically meaningful threshold of > 5 points. Analysis of the subscales revealed PWB with the largest changes of 4.8 (≥3: −X vs < 3: −X; p < 0.001, ES: 1.00). FWB changes were 2.1 (≥3: −X vs < 3: −X; p≤0.0001, ES: 0.48) and EWB changes were 0.7 (≥3: −X vs < 3: −X; p < 0.001, ES: 0.26). CRF did not significantly impact SWB. Notably, many of these subscale changes surpassed the clinically meaningful threshold of > 2 points. Conclusions: This study underscores the rapid onset and significant impact of CRF on QoL in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Clinically meaningful increases in CRF, even after a single chemotherapy cycle, were predictive of substantial declines in QoL, particularly in physical and functional well-being. These results emphasize the urgent need for targeted fatigue management strategies, such as tailored interventions addressing physical and functional domains, to improve patient outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT03367572 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.12130
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of cancer related fatigue on quality of life of 1,262 patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy: A URCC NCORP nationwide phase III RCT.

Samer S. Kasbari, Jeremy McGuire, Luke J. Peppone, Belal Firwana et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Impact of cancer related fatigue on quality of life of 1,262 patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy: A URCC NCORP nationwide phase III RCT.

Samer S. Kasbari, Jeremy McGuire, Luke J. Peppone, Belal Firwana, Thomas J. Saphner, Chin-Shang Li, Joseph J. Guido, Nikesha Gilmore, Kevin Spath, Jeffrey Ramos-Santiago
article en

Abstract

12130 Background: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms reported by cancer patients, significantly impairing quality of life (QoL) across physical, functional, emotional, and social domains. Despite its prevalence, limited data exist quantifying how rapid changes in CRF after a single chemotherapy cycle influence QoL. We aim to evaluate if rapid clinically meaningful changes in CRF post chemotherapy impact QoL in breast cancer patients. Methods: This Phase III RCT (NCT03367572) enrolled chemotherapy-naïve breast cancer patients across 21 NCORP practices receiving high/moderate emetogenic chemotherapy. CRF was assessed at baseline and post chemotherapy cycle 1 (n = 1,262) using a four-day home diary, with maximum fatigue change as the primary outcome. For analysis, the CRF variable was dichotomized into two categories: a clinically significant increase (≥3 points) and less than a 3-point increase. QOL was measured with FACT-G and its subscales: emotional (EWB), functional (FWB), physical (PWB), and social (SWB). ANCOVA and Cohen’s d effect size (ES) evaluated whether clinically meaningful CRF changes predicted QOL changes across cycles. Results: Among 1,262 patients with valid fatigue scores, 74.8% experienced increased CRF after cycle 1, with 53.2% reporting a ≥3-point increase and a mean increase of 2.9 points for the group. Clinically significant increases in CRF strongly impacted quality of life (QOL), as reflected in FACT-G Total Score changes post-cycle 1 (≥3: −12.4 vs < 3: −4.7; mean difference: 7.7, p < 0.001, ES: 0.74), exceeding the clinically meaningful threshold of > 5 points. Analysis of the subscales revealed PWB with the largest changes of 4.8 (≥3: −X vs < 3: −X; p < 0.001, ES: 1.00). FWB changes were 2.1 (≥3: −X vs < 3: −X; p≤0.0001, ES: 0.48) and EWB changes were 0.7 (≥3: −X vs < 3: −X; p < 0.001, ES: 0.26). CRF did not significantly impact SWB. Notably, many of these subscale changes surpassed the clinically meaningful threshold of > 2 points. Conclusions: This study underscores the rapid onset and significant impact of CRF on QoL in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Clinically meaningful increases in CRF, even after a single chemotherapy cycle, were predictive of substantial declines in QoL, particularly in physical and functional well-being. These results emphasize the urgent need for targeted fatigue management strategies, such as tailored interventions addressing physical and functional domains, to improve patient outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT03367572 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Aurora Health Care (US), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium (US), Heartland Cancer Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.