The association between Gleason grade group, PSA levels, and prostatectomy outcomes for the optimized treatment of prostate cancer patients.

e17141 Background: Radical prostatectomy is a common approach for managing localized prostate cancer (PCa). Positive surgical margins (PSMs), upstaging or upgrading are associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence and warrant additional treatment such as radiation. This study aimed to assess the association between pre-operative PCa grade group and prostatectomy outcome based on PSMs, upstaging or upgrading, utilizing the specialized prostate cancer SEER database. Methods: Data for histologically confirmed PCa patients diagnosed between 2010-2020 were obtained from the SEER prostate cancer database, excluding cases with missing stage or Gleason scores, multiple primary tumors, or non-adenocarcinoma histology. Treatment was defined as the initial choice within a year of diagnosis. Results: A cohort of 278,877 patients met the inclusion criteria, where 123,640 selected prostatectomy for treatment. The median follow-up was 58 months. 34,748, 44,104, 22,061, 14,759 and 7,968 patients were in GG1-5, respectively. The percentage of PSMs increased with tumor grade being 8.6%, 8.7%, 9.1%, 9.2%, and 11%, in GG1-5, respectively. An increase in PSA levels was associated with a higher risk of PSMs, with odds ratios of 1.36 (95% CI: 1.25–1.47, p < 0.001) for PSA levels 4–10 ng/mL and 2.13 (95% CI: 1.95–2.32, p < 0.001) for levels >10 ng/mL after adjusting for clinical grade. Pre-operative grading predicts PSMs and/or upstaging in 15.7%, 23.1%, 28.9%, 33.2% or 41.8% for GG1-5 respectively (p<0.001). 44,788 patients who were diagnosed with GG3 or more, had a risk of PSMs/upstaging of 32.6%. Conclusions: Elevated PSA levels/grade group prior to prostatectomy is associated with an increased risk of PSMs and/or upstaging. It appears that patients with grade 3 PCa or higher may not be optimal candidates for prostatectomy, as subsequently approximately a third of patients may require further treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e17141
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The association between Gleason grade group, PSA levels, and prostatectomy outcomes for the optimized treatment of prostate cancer patients.

Noa Shani Shrem, Amichay Meirovitz, Kim Sheva, Gal Ben‐Arie et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

The association between Gleason grade group, PSA levels, and prostatectomy outcomes for the optimized treatment of prostate cancer patients.

Noa Shani Shrem, Amichay Meirovitz, Kim Sheva, Gal Ben‐Arie, Keren Rouvinov, Michal Sarfaty, Nitzan Sagie, Natalia Oskotsky
article en

Abstract

e17141 Background: Radical prostatectomy is a common approach for managing localized prostate cancer (PCa). Positive surgical margins (PSMs), upstaging or upgrading are associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence and warrant additional treatment such as radiation. This study aimed to assess the association between pre-operative PCa grade group and prostatectomy outcome based on PSMs, upstaging or upgrading, utilizing the specialized prostate cancer SEER database. Methods: Data for histologically confirmed PCa patients diagnosed between 2010-2020 were obtained from the SEER prostate cancer database, excluding cases with missing stage or Gleason scores, multiple primary tumors, or non-adenocarcinoma histology. Treatment was defined as the initial choice within a year of diagnosis. Results: A cohort of 278,877 patients met the inclusion criteria, where 123,640 selected prostatectomy for treatment. The median follow-up was 58 months. 34,748, 44,104, 22,061, 14,759 and 7,968 patients were in GG1-5, respectively. The percentage of PSMs increased with tumor grade being 8.6%, 8.7%, 9.1%, 9.2%, and 11%, in GG1-5, respectively. An increase in PSA levels was associated with a higher risk of PSMs, with odds ratios of 1.36 (95% CI: 1.25–1.47, p < 0.001) for PSA levels 4–10 ng/mL and 2.13 (95% CI: 1.95–2.32, p < 0.001) for levels >10 ng/mL after adjusting for clinical grade. Pre-operative grading predicts PSMs and/or upstaging in 15.7%, 23.1%, 28.9%, 33.2% or 41.8% for GG1-5 respectively (p<0.001). 44,788 patients who were diagnosed with GG3 or more, had a risk of PSMs/upstaging of 32.6%. Conclusions: Elevated PSA levels/grade group prior to prostatectomy is associated with an increased risk of PSMs and/or upstaging. It appears that patients with grade 3 PCa or higher may not be optimal candidates for prostatectomy, as subsequently approximately a third of patients may require further treatment.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Tel Aviv University (IL), Sheba Medical Center (IL), Soroka Medical Center (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.