Comparison of two electroacupuncture regimens on symptoms and brain structures in breast cancer survivors: A randomized, controlled trial.

12119 Background: Although electroacupuncture (EA) has shown usefulness in managing neuropsychiatric symptoms in cancer survivors, a specific acupoint regimen has not been established. We conducted a randomized, controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded pilot trial to compare two EA regimens on neuropsychiatric symptoms and associated brain structural changes in breast cancer survivors. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05283577). Methods: Breast cancer survivors who self-reported cognitive impairment, fatigue, insomnia, or psychological distress were randomized (1:1) to receive ten weekly therapeutic EA to target either neuropsychiatric-specific (nEA) or non-neuropsychiatric-specific (sham EA, sEA) acupoints. Outcomes were assessed using patient-reported outcomes (EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-Cog, MFSI-SF), neurocognitive tests (CANTAB), and neuroimaging (measuring gray matter, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid, diffusion tensor metrics, and volume and mean intensity of the hippocampus) before and after treatment. We computed group-specific treatment effect sizes (Glass's Δ) adjusted for baseline variability using linear mixed models. A Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed between the neurocognitive scores and the imaging metrics. Multiple testing was controlled via the Benjamini-Hochberg method, with statistical significance set at P-adjusted < 0.05. Adverse events (AEs) were graded with CTCAE v5. Results: Thirty-five participants were recruited, of which five dropped out, leaving 30 (86%) completing all treatment sessions. The average (±SD) age was 58.2 ±12.2 years, with 66% non-Hispanic White, 77% holding a Bachelor’s degree or higher, 94% received systemic treatment and/or radiotherapy for cancer, 86% reporting ≥2 neuropsychiatric symptoms. Both groups showed statistically significant pre-post medium-to-large effect sizes in perceived cognitive function, fatigue, and quality of life. nEA group observed significant improvement in cognitive domains of attention (ES=0.708, P-adjusted=0.004), memory (ES=0.488, P-adjusted=0.026), and emotional functioning (ES=0.664, P-adjusted=0.004). Neuroimages showed greater gray matter volume change (P=0.0327) and post-treatment hippocampus mean intensity (P=0.0468) in nEA versus sEA. In the nEA group, correlations were observed between attention and gray matter volume (P=0.0198) and between executive function and hippocampus volume (P=0.0204). All AEs were grade 2 or lower: nEA participants reported pain (n=1) and bleeding (n=1), while sEA participants reported numbness (n=2), bruising (n=1), nausea (n=1), and redness (n=1). Conclusions: Ten weeks of electroacupuncture targeting neuropsychiatric-related acupoints, compared to sham acupoints, improves neuropsychiatric symptoms in breast cancer survivors, supported by clinically relevant structural brain changes. Clinical trial information: NCT05283577 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.12119
Primary Topic
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of two electroacupuncture regimens on symptoms and brain structures in breast cancer survivors: A randomized, controlled trial.

Shaista Malik, Julia Trudeau, Munjal M. Acharya, Sayeh Lavasani et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
article

Comparison of two electroacupuncture regimens on symptoms and brain structures in breast cancer survivors: A randomized, controlled trial.

Shaista Malik, Julia Trudeau, Munjal M. Acharya, Sayeh Lavasani, Matthew Heshmatipour, Alexandre Chan, Lifang Xie, Ding Quan Ng, Charles L. Limoli, Olivia G.G. Drayson, Sanghoon Lee, Ritesh Parajuli
article en

Abstract

12119 Background: Although electroacupuncture (EA) has shown usefulness in managing neuropsychiatric symptoms in cancer survivors, a specific acupoint regimen has not been established. We conducted a randomized, controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded pilot trial to compare two EA regimens on neuropsychiatric symptoms and associated brain structural changes in breast cancer survivors. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05283577). Methods: Breast cancer survivors who self-reported cognitive impairment, fatigue, insomnia, or psychological distress were randomized (1:1) to receive ten weekly therapeutic EA to target either neuropsychiatric-specific (nEA) or non-neuropsychiatric-specific (sham EA, sEA) acupoints. Outcomes were assessed using patient-reported outcomes (EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-Cog, MFSI-SF), neurocognitive tests (CANTAB), and neuroimaging (measuring gray matter, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid, diffusion tensor metrics, and volume and mean intensity of the hippocampus) before and after treatment. We computed group-specific treatment effect sizes (Glass's Δ) adjusted for baseline variability using linear mixed models. A Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed between the neurocognitive scores and the imaging metrics. Multiple testing was controlled via the Benjamini-Hochberg method, with statistical significance set at P-adjusted < 0.05. Adverse events (AEs) were graded with CTCAE v5. Results: Thirty-five participants were recruited, of which five dropped out, leaving 30 (86%) completing all treatment sessions. The average (±SD) age was 58.2 ±12.2 years, with 66% non-Hispanic White, 77% holding a Bachelor’s degree or higher, 94% received systemic treatment and/or radiotherapy for cancer, 86% reporting ≥2 neuropsychiatric symptoms. Both groups showed statistically significant pre-post medium-to-large effect sizes in perceived cognitive function, fatigue, and quality of life. nEA group observed significant improvement in cognitive domains of attention (ES=0.708, P-adjusted=0.004), memory (ES=0.488, P-adjusted=0.026), and emotional functioning (ES=0.664, P-adjusted=0.004). Neuroimages showed greater gray matter volume change (P=0.0327) and post-treatment hippocampus mean intensity (P=0.0468) in nEA versus sEA. In the nEA group, correlations were observed between attention and gray matter volume (P=0.0198) and between executive function and hippocampus volume (P=0.0204). All AEs were grade 2 or lower: nEA participants reported pain (n=1) and bleeding (n=1), while sEA participants reported numbness (n=2), bruising (n=1), nausea (n=1), and redness (n=1). Conclusions: Ten weeks of electroacupuncture targeting neuropsychiatric-related acupoints, compared to sham acupoints, improves neuropsychiatric symptoms in breast cancer survivors, supported by clinically relevant structural brain changes. Clinical trial information: NCT05283577 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of California, Irvine (US), Kyung Hee University (KR)
California Breast Cancer Research Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.