Crop‐Livestock Integration in Urban Agriculture: Implication for Urban Food Security in Ghana

ABSTRACT Urban food insecurity is increasingly common in sub‐Saharan Africa, including Ghana, due to rapid population growth and urbanization. Urban agriculture (UA) is considered a strategic approach to reducing urban food insecurity. Although there is a growing body of research on urban agriculture, evidence on integrated urban crop‐livestock farming systems is scarce. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap by identifying the precursors of food security among urban households practicing different urban agriculture (UA) systems and analyzing the impact of integrated crop‐livestock (ICL) systems on household food security in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana. Our findings indicate that different sets of factors affect the food security of households practicing different urban agriculture systems. However, we observed that household income is negatively correlated with urban food insecurity across all forms of urban agriculture. Access to vacant land improves dietary diversity for households without farms, with crops, or those practicing integrated crop‐livestock farming, while access to credit enhances dietary diversity for households without farms, with livestock, or integrated crop‐livestock farming. The findings indicate that households practicing ICL farming systems have greater access to food and more diversified diets than households practicing other UA systems. The ICL farming system increases urban households' access to food by 84% compared to households without a farm, 48% compared to households with only crops, and 37% compared to households with only livestock. Households without land remain reliant on food purchases, which are impacted by rising costs. Furthermore, the ICL farming system enhances urban households' dietary diversity by 12%, 7.6%, and 16% compared to households without a farm, with only crops, or with only livestock, respectively. Therefore, the incorporation of ICL farming into urban planning is crucial for improving access to food and diversified diets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food and Energy Security
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.70100
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crop‐Livestock Integration in Urban Agriculture: Implication for Urban Food Security in Ghana

Amos Mensah, Jonathan Quaye, Emmanuel Donkor, Faizal Adams et al.
3 citations
Food and Energy Security
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
5.25
article

Crop‐Livestock Integration in Urban Agriculture: Implication for Urban Food Security in Ghana

Amos Mensah, Jonathan Quaye, Emmanuel Donkor, Faizal Adams, Ayat Ullah, Seth Euah
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Urban food insecurity is increasingly common in sub‐Saharan Africa, including Ghana, due to rapid population growth and urbanization. Urban agriculture (UA) is considered a strategic approach to reducing urban food insecurity. Although there is a growing body of research on urban agriculture, evidence on integrated urban crop‐livestock farming systems is scarce. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap by identifying the precursors of food security among urban households practicing different urban agriculture (UA) systems and analyzing the impact of integrated crop‐livestock (ICL) systems on household food security in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana. Our findings indicate that different sets of factors affect the food security of households practicing different urban agriculture systems. However, we observed that household income is negatively correlated with urban food insecurity across all forms of urban agriculture. Access to vacant land improves dietary diversity for households without farms, with crops, or those practicing integrated crop‐livestock farming, while access to credit enhances dietary diversity for households without farms, with livestock, or integrated crop‐livestock farming. The findings indicate that households practicing ICL farming systems have greater access to food and more diversified diets than households practicing other UA systems. The ICL farming system increases urban households' access to food by 84% compared to households without a farm, 48% compared to households with only crops, and 37% compared to households with only livestock. Households without land remain reliant on food purchases, which are impacted by rising costs. Furthermore, the ICL farming system enhances urban households' dietary diversity by 12%, 7.6%, and 16% compared to households without a farm, with only crops, or with only livestock, respectively. Therefore, the incorporation of ICL farming into urban planning is crucial for improving access to food and diversified diets.

Food and Energy SecurityVol. 14(3)
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
5.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.