Sexual health communication and young-onset cancer (YOC): Healthcare practitioners’ attitudes and practices.

12113 Background: Sexual health-related discussions are often challenging for Healthcare Practitioners (HCPs) and patients, making sexual health communication a frequently neglected aspect of cancer care. HCPs’ lack of knowledge regarding LGBTQ+ cancer care contributes to greater unmet survivorship needs.We explored HCPs’ attitudes and practices regarding sexual health-related discussions with YOC patients (25yrs–50yrs) to identify barriers and training needs for improving effective communication. Methods: A cross-sectional, mixed-methods design was employed. 160 HCPs working with patients with gastrointestinal and head & neck cancers at the Trinity St James Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland were invited to complete an anonymised 23-item online questionnaire. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics for quantitative responses, and thematic analysis for qualitative insights. Results: 52 respondents included; Medical Oncology (46.2%), Surgical Oncology (36.5%), Radiation Oncology (11.5%), Psych-Oncology (5.8%), and Palliative Care (5.8%). 34.6% (18/52) and 25.0% (13/52) reported ‘rarely’ and ‘never’ enquiring about sexual health-related issues during routine consultations. 34.6% (18/52) reported feeling ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ unconfident initiating a sexual health-related discussion, while 5.7% (3/52) reported feeling adequately trained to enquire about sexual health-related issues. 43.1% (22/51) reported feeling ‘somewhat’ knowledgeable regarding the impact of cancer on sexual health, while 52.9% (27/51) reported they do not have sufficient knowledge regarding LGBTQ+ cancer care needs. Whilst 63.5% (33/52) agreed knowing a patient’s sexual orientation and/or gender identity is relevant to their healthcare, 19.2% (10/52) reported asking about sexual orientation in routine practice. Notably, 98.1% (51/52) reported ‘rarely’ or ‘never’ enquiring about gender identity. Common identified barriers included: lack of training or knowledge (76.9% (40/52)), inappropriate time/setting (59.6% (31/52)), HCP discomfort (46.2% (24/52)), and patient discomfort (48.1% (25/52)). There was strong interest in receiving formal sexual health-related education and training, and 75.0% (39/52) believed access to a specialist for advice and/or to whom patients could be referred would increase HCPs confidence. Conclusions: HCPs acknowledged the importance of sexual health-related communication with YOC patients, yet significant gaps exist in knowledge, confidence, and training, particularly regarding the LGBTQ+ population.These findings underscore the need for targeted training and education to empower HCPs to engage in meaningful sexual health communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.12113
Primary Topic
Family Support in Illness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sexual health communication and young-onset cancer (YOC): Healthcare practitioners’ attitudes and practices.

Nicola Keohane, Emily Harrold, Louise Kelly, Maeve A. Lowery et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Family Support in Illness
article

Sexual health communication and young-onset cancer (YOC): Healthcare practitioners’ attitudes and practices.

Nicola Keohane, Emily Harrold, Louise Kelly, Maeve A. Lowery, Katie O'Neill
article en

Abstract

12113 Background: Sexual health-related discussions are often challenging for Healthcare Practitioners (HCPs) and patients, making sexual health communication a frequently neglected aspect of cancer care. HCPs’ lack of knowledge regarding LGBTQ+ cancer care contributes to greater unmet survivorship needs.We explored HCPs’ attitudes and practices regarding sexual health-related discussions with YOC patients (25yrs–50yrs) to identify barriers and training needs for improving effective communication. Methods: A cross-sectional, mixed-methods design was employed. 160 HCPs working with patients with gastrointestinal and head & neck cancers at the Trinity St James Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland were invited to complete an anonymised 23-item online questionnaire. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics for quantitative responses, and thematic analysis for qualitative insights. Results: 52 respondents included; Medical Oncology (46.2%), Surgical Oncology (36.5%), Radiation Oncology (11.5%), Psych-Oncology (5.8%), and Palliative Care (5.8%). 34.6% (18/52) and 25.0% (13/52) reported ‘rarely’ and ‘never’ enquiring about sexual health-related issues during routine consultations. 34.6% (18/52) reported feeling ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ unconfident initiating a sexual health-related discussion, while 5.7% (3/52) reported feeling adequately trained to enquire about sexual health-related issues. 43.1% (22/51) reported feeling ‘somewhat’ knowledgeable regarding the impact of cancer on sexual health, while 52.9% (27/51) reported they do not have sufficient knowledge regarding LGBTQ+ cancer care needs. Whilst 63.5% (33/52) agreed knowing a patient’s sexual orientation and/or gender identity is relevant to their healthcare, 19.2% (10/52) reported asking about sexual orientation in routine practice. Notably, 98.1% (51/52) reported ‘rarely’ or ‘never’ enquiring about gender identity. Common identified barriers included: lack of training or knowledge (76.9% (40/52)), inappropriate time/setting (59.6% (31/52)), HCP discomfort (46.2% (24/52)), and patient discomfort (48.1% (25/52)). There was strong interest in receiving formal sexual health-related education and training, and 75.0% (39/52) believed access to a specialist for advice and/or to whom patients could be referred would increase HCPs confidence. Conclusions: HCPs acknowledged the importance of sexual health-related communication with YOC patients, yet significant gaps exist in knowledge, confidence, and training, particularly regarding the LGBTQ+ population.These findings underscore the need for targeted training and education to empower HCPs to engage in meaningful sexual health communication.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
St. James's Hospital (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Family Support in Illness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.