Prognostic awareness in older adults with metastatic cancer: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

1624 Background: Prognostic awareness plays a key role in patient outcomes, particularly among older adults with metastatic cancer. This secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effect of a Geriatric Assessment-guided Intervention (GAIN-S) on patient responses to prognosis items over time between two arms. Methods: Eligible participants, aged 65+, diagnosed with metastatic solid cancers, and undergoing treatment across multiple Brazilian states, were randomized 1:1 into two arms. The GAIN-S included a geriatric assessment (GA), which devised tailored treatment based on identified impairments. Patients in the usual care (UC) arm received standard care. Both arms completed the Illness and Prognostic Awareness Impact Questionnaire (PAIS) at baseline (T1) and 12 weeks (T2), assessing Emotional (10 items; range 0-30) and Adaptive (12 items; range 0-36) domains; each rated on a 4-point Likert scale The change in PAIS (T2 - T1) was calculated for each participant in both the GAIN-S and UC arms, and then the mean changes in PAIS between the two arms were compared via independent t-test. Results: Eighty-six patients were approached; 80 provided consent (93% enrollment rate). At 12 weeks, the analytic sample included 77 patients. Demographic characteristics were well-balanced between arms, with a mean age of 74.5 years (SD=6.1), primarily female (55.8%), self-identified as White (71.4%), and 50.4% had at least a college education. The most common cancer types were genitourinary (29.9%), breast (24.7%), and gastrointestinal (22.1%). At T1, no significant differences were noted in PAIS between arms. However, there was significant improvement in PAIS Emotional (UC: mean change=-0.26, SD=1.6 vs GAIN-S: mean change=0.87, SD=1.4; P=0.002) and Adaptive (UC: mean change=-0.07, SD=0.6 vs GAIN-S: mean change=0.74, SD=1.7; P=0.008) domains between in the GAIN-S arm (Table). Conclusions: This secondary analysis highlights the impact of GA-guided care on improving prognostic awareness in older adults with metastatic cancer. GAIN-S resulted in significant improvements in Emotional and Adaptive domains compared to UC. Tailored interventions addressing the specific needs of older adults with metastatic cancer may enhance understanding of prognosis and improve adaptive responses. Studies are needed to determine whether these differences translate into meaningful improvements in outcomes. Impact of GAIN-S intervention on prognostic awareness. Change over time Arm 1 (T2-T1)Mean (SD) Arm 2 (T2-T1)Mean (SD) DifferenceArm 2 - Arm 1 (SE) p-value Emotional Domain10 items (range: 0-30) -0.263 (1.62) 0.872 (1.44) 1.135 (0.35) 0.002 Adaptive Domain12 items (range: 0-36) -0.079 (0.67) 0.744 (1.73) 0.823 (0.30) 0.008

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.1624
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic awareness in older adults with metastatic cancer: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Ryan David Nipp, Gabriel Marques dos Anjos, Jose Adolfo Cerveira, Sarah Ananda Gomes et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
article

Prognostic awareness in older adults with metastatic cancer: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Ryan David Nipp, Gabriel Marques dos Anjos, Jose Adolfo Cerveira, Sarah Ananda Gomes, Murilo Buso, William Dale, Cristiane Decat Bergerot, Marianne Razavi, Enrique Soto‐Pérez‐de‐Celis, Sumanta Kumar Pal, Errol J. Philip, Mariana Laloni, Marcos Vinicius da Silva França, William Hiromi Fuzita, Paulo Gustavo Bergerot, Areej El‐Jawahri, Carlos Gil Ferreira, Renata Ferrari, Jonas Ribeiro Gomes Silva
article en

Abstract

1624 Background: Prognostic awareness plays a key role in patient outcomes, particularly among older adults with metastatic cancer. This secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effect of a Geriatric Assessment-guided Intervention (GAIN-S) on patient responses to prognosis items over time between two arms. Methods: Eligible participants, aged 65+, diagnosed with metastatic solid cancers, and undergoing treatment across multiple Brazilian states, were randomized 1:1 into two arms. The GAIN-S included a geriatric assessment (GA), which devised tailored treatment based on identified impairments. Patients in the usual care (UC) arm received standard care. Both arms completed the Illness and Prognostic Awareness Impact Questionnaire (PAIS) at baseline (T1) and 12 weeks (T2), assessing Emotional (10 items; range 0-30) and Adaptive (12 items; range 0-36) domains; each rated on a 4-point Likert scale The change in PAIS (T2 - T1) was calculated for each participant in both the GAIN-S and UC arms, and then the mean changes in PAIS between the two arms were compared via independent t-test. Results: Eighty-six patients were approached; 80 provided consent (93% enrollment rate). At 12 weeks, the analytic sample included 77 patients. Demographic characteristics were well-balanced between arms, with a mean age of 74.5 years (SD=6.1), primarily female (55.8%), self-identified as White (71.4%), and 50.4% had at least a college education. The most common cancer types were genitourinary (29.9%), breast (24.7%), and gastrointestinal (22.1%). At T1, no significant differences were noted in PAIS between arms. However, there was significant improvement in PAIS Emotional (UC: mean change=-0.26, SD=1.6 vs GAIN-S: mean change=0.87, SD=1.4; P=0.002) and Adaptive (UC: mean change=-0.07, SD=0.6 vs GAIN-S: mean change=0.74, SD=1.7; P=0.008) domains between in the GAIN-S arm (Table). Conclusions: This secondary analysis highlights the impact of GA-guided care on improving prognostic awareness in older adults with metastatic cancer. GAIN-S resulted in significant improvements in Emotional and Adaptive domains compared to UC. Tailored interventions addressing the specific needs of older adults with metastatic cancer may enhance understanding of prognosis and improve adaptive responses. Studies are needed to determine whether these differences translate into meaningful improvements in outcomes. Impact of GAIN-S intervention on prognostic awareness. Change over time Arm 1 (T2-T1)Mean (SD) Arm 2 (T2-T1)Mean (SD) DifferenceArm 2 - Arm 1 (SE) p-value Emotional Domain10 items (range: 0-30) -0.263 (1.62) 0.872 (1.44) 1.135 (0.35) 0.002 Adaptive Domain12 items (range: 0-36) -0.079 (0.67) 0.744 (1.73) 0.823 (0.30) 0.008

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
City Of Hope National Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Oklahoma City University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), City of Hope (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.