Racial disparities in major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events outcomes among hospitalized cholangiocarcinoma patients.

e23097 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma presents significant treatment challenges, with racial and ethnic disparities influencing clinical outcomes. This study analyzes data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2021 to investigate racial disparities in major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events outcomes, mortality, and healthcare resource utilization among hospitalized cholangiocarcinoma patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using the NIS database to identify adult cholangiocarcinoma patients. Demographic and clinical characteristics, including race, age, sex, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities, were compared across racial groups. Key outcomes included in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), atrial fibrillation (A-fib), stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and healthcare resource utilization. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders to assess racial disparities in these outcomes. Results: Among 139 patients with cholangiocarcinoma, the racial distribution was White (67.4%), Black (10.8%), Hispanic (12.2%), Asian or Pacific Islander (6.2%), Native American (0.6%), and Other (3.6%). Black patients had significantly higher odds of mortality (OR 1.438, p < 0.001) and sudden cardiac arrest (OR 2.159, p < 0.001) compared to White patients. Hispanic patients had a lower risk of MI (OR 0.726, p = 0.046), while Black patients were more likely to experience stroke (OR 1.763, p < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation was significantly less common in Black (OR 0.469, p < 0.001), Hispanic (OR 0.492, p < 0.001), and Asian or Pacific Islander (OR 0.591, p < 0.001) patients. Black patients had the longest LOS compared to White patients (0.942 days, p < 0.001), while Native Americans had significantly longer LOS (1.64 days, p = 0.017). Hispanic and Asian groups had higher total hospital charges compared to White patients ($20,619.25, $18,181.22, and $24,200.53, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study highlights significant racial disparities in cholangiocarcinoma outcomes, with Black, Native American, and Other racial groups experiencing higher mortality and adverse cardiovascular events. The lower incidence of MI and A-fib in Hispanic and Asian patients suggests potential protective factors, though disparities in stroke and sudden cardiac arrest persist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e23097
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial disparities in major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events outcomes among hospitalized cholangiocarcinoma patients.

Sumita Khatri, Siddharth Pravin Agrawal, Syed Muhammad Zulfiqar Hyder Naqvi, Kanishka Uttam Chandani et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

Racial disparities in major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events outcomes among hospitalized cholangiocarcinoma patients.

Sumita Khatri, Siddharth Pravin Agrawal, Syed Muhammad Zulfiqar Hyder Naqvi, Kanishka Uttam Chandani, Sharan Jhaveri, Dev Lotia, Amanda Lussier
article en

Abstract

e23097 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma presents significant treatment challenges, with racial and ethnic disparities influencing clinical outcomes. This study analyzes data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2021 to investigate racial disparities in major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events outcomes, mortality, and healthcare resource utilization among hospitalized cholangiocarcinoma patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using the NIS database to identify adult cholangiocarcinoma patients. Demographic and clinical characteristics, including race, age, sex, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities, were compared across racial groups. Key outcomes included in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), atrial fibrillation (A-fib), stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and healthcare resource utilization. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders to assess racial disparities in these outcomes. Results: Among 139 patients with cholangiocarcinoma, the racial distribution was White (67.4%), Black (10.8%), Hispanic (12.2%), Asian or Pacific Islander (6.2%), Native American (0.6%), and Other (3.6%). Black patients had significantly higher odds of mortality (OR 1.438, p < 0.001) and sudden cardiac arrest (OR 2.159, p < 0.001) compared to White patients. Hispanic patients had a lower risk of MI (OR 0.726, p = 0.046), while Black patients were more likely to experience stroke (OR 1.763, p < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation was significantly less common in Black (OR 0.469, p < 0.001), Hispanic (OR 0.492, p < 0.001), and Asian or Pacific Islander (OR 0.591, p < 0.001) patients. Black patients had the longest LOS compared to White patients (0.942 days, p < 0.001), while Native Americans had significantly longer LOS (1.64 days, p = 0.017). Hispanic and Asian groups had higher total hospital charges compared to White patients ($20,619.25, $18,181.22, and $24,200.53, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study highlights significant racial disparities in cholangiocarcinoma outcomes, with Black, Native American, and Other racial groups experiencing higher mortality and adverse cardiovascular events. The lower incidence of MI and A-fib in Hispanic and Asian patients suggests potential protective factors, though disparities in stroke and sudden cardiac arrest persist.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Cleveland Clinic (US), New York Medical College (US), Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.