Prevalence of and factors associated with financial toxicity among gastrointestinal cancer patients in Pakistan.

1616 Background: Financial toxicity (FT) impacts cancer care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), affecting treatment adherence and quality of life. This study assesses FT prevalence and associated factors among gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients across distinct healthcare systems in Pakistan. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted across three tertiary care centers in Karachi: Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH, private, fee-for-service), Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center (JPMC, public, free), and Cancer Foundation Hospital (CFH, private-philanthropy, subsidized). FT was assessed using the Urdu version of the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity–Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT). Multivariable negative binomial regression identified factors linked to high FT. Results: Of 375 patients, 44.5% were from AKUH, 33.6% from JPMC, and 21.9% from CFH. Mean age was 50.8 ± 14.4 years, with 62.4% males. Only 8.3% had health insurance, and the median International Wealth Index (IWI) was 79.9 (IQR: 57.1–95.1). Catastrophic healthcare expenditure affected 41.7%. The mean COST-FACIT score was 16.0 ± 7.4, with 46.1% experiencing mild FT (score: 14–26) and 41.9% moderate FT (score: ≤14). Patients delaying or forgoing care had higher FT (p < 0.001). Borrowing money, selling assets, or cutting essential expenses were strongly associated with increased FT (p < 0.001). Patients at AKUH reported higher FT than JPMC (IRR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74–0.97). Younger patients (21–50 years) (IRR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46–0.95) and those receiving chemotherapy (IRR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81–0.98) experienced higher FT. Females (IRR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.17–1.58) and higher socioeconomic status (IRR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.06–1.83) were associated with lower FT. Conclusions: Nearly 85% of GI cancer patients faced FT. Younger age, male gender, lower socioeconomic status, and systemic therapy were associated with higher FT. Subsidized care, financial support, and institution-specific strategies are critical to mitigating FT in LMIC healthcare systems. Patient characteristics and treatment costs across hospitals. AKUH JPMC CFH Gender, n (%) Male Female 109 (65.3)58 (34.7) 73 (57.9)53 (42.1) 52 (63.4)30 (36.6) Age (yrs), mean (SD) 54.3 (1.1) 44.2 (1.3) 53.6 (1.4) IWI score, mean (SD) 84.0 (1.5) 52.8 (2.6) 80.4 (2.0) COST-FACIT score, mean (SD) 16.7 (7.9) 15.3 (7.6) 15.7 (5.8) EORTC QLQ summary score (Quality of Life score), mean (SD) 78.1 (15.5) 79.3 (17.9) 75.1 (16.0) Monthly household income (USD), median (IQR) 358.4 (179.2-716.8) 107.5 (43.0-179.2) 233.0 (71.7-358.4) Out of pocket costs (USD), median (IQR) Surgery and associated inpatient Chemotherapy Radiotherapy 2509.0 (1003.6-4569.89)1433.7 (573.5-3225.8)896.1 (255.4-2150.5) 0 (0-0)0 (0-304.7)0 (0-0) 1433.7 (1075.3-1792.1)1469.5 (358.4-1881.7)1075.3 (716.8-1792.1) *Costs converted using 1 USD = 279 Pakistani Rupee.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.1616
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of and factors associated with financial toxicity among gastrointestinal cancer patients in Pakistan.

Syed Nabeel Zafar, Lubna Saleem, Sehar Salim Virani, Anwar Khursheed et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Prevalence of and factors associated with financial toxicity among gastrointestinal cancer patients in Pakistan.

Syed Nabeel Zafar, Lubna Saleem, Sehar Salim Virani, Anwar Khursheed, Hasan Siddiqui, Fatima Shaukat, Muhammad Rizwan Khan, A. Jamal, Juliet S. Lumati
article en

Abstract

1616 Background: Financial toxicity (FT) impacts cancer care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), affecting treatment adherence and quality of life. This study assesses FT prevalence and associated factors among gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients across distinct healthcare systems in Pakistan. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted across three tertiary care centers in Karachi: Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH, private, fee-for-service), Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center (JPMC, public, free), and Cancer Foundation Hospital (CFH, private-philanthropy, subsidized). FT was assessed using the Urdu version of the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity–Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT). Multivariable negative binomial regression identified factors linked to high FT. Results: Of 375 patients, 44.5% were from AKUH, 33.6% from JPMC, and 21.9% from CFH. Mean age was 50.8 ± 14.4 years, with 62.4% males. Only 8.3% had health insurance, and the median International Wealth Index (IWI) was 79.9 (IQR: 57.1–95.1). Catastrophic healthcare expenditure affected 41.7%. The mean COST-FACIT score was 16.0 ± 7.4, with 46.1% experiencing mild FT (score: 14–26) and 41.9% moderate FT (score: ≤14). Patients delaying or forgoing care had higher FT (p < 0.001). Borrowing money, selling assets, or cutting essential expenses were strongly associated with increased FT (p < 0.001). Patients at AKUH reported higher FT than JPMC (IRR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74–0.97). Younger patients (21–50 years) (IRR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46–0.95) and those receiving chemotherapy (IRR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81–0.98) experienced higher FT. Females (IRR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.17–1.58) and higher socioeconomic status (IRR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.06–1.83) were associated with lower FT. Conclusions: Nearly 85% of GI cancer patients faced FT. Younger age, male gender, lower socioeconomic status, and systemic therapy were associated with higher FT. Subsidized care, financial support, and institution-specific strategies are critical to mitigating FT in LMIC healthcare systems. Patient characteristics and treatment costs across hospitals. AKUH JPMC CFH Gender, n (%) Male Female 109 (65.3)58 (34.7) 73 (57.9)53 (42.1) 52 (63.4)30 (36.6) Age (yrs), mean (SD) 54.3 (1.1) 44.2 (1.3) 53.6 (1.4) IWI score, mean (SD) 84.0 (1.5) 52.8 (2.6) 80.4 (2.0) COST-FACIT score, mean (SD) 16.7 (7.9) 15.3 (7.6) 15.7 (5.8) EORTC QLQ summary score (Quality of Life score), mean (SD) 78.1 (15.5) 79.3 (17.9) 75.1 (16.0) Monthly household income (USD), median (IQR) 358.4 (179.2-716.8) 107.5 (43.0-179.2) 233.0 (71.7-358.4) Out of pocket costs (USD), median (IQR) Surgery and associated inpatient Chemotherapy Radiotherapy 2509.0 (1003.6-4569.89)1433.7 (573.5-3225.8)896.1 (255.4-2150.5) 0 (0-0)0 (0-304.7)0 (0-0) 1433.7 (1075.3-1792.1)1469.5 (358.4-1881.7)1075.3 (716.8-1792.1) *Costs converted using 1 USD = 279 Pakistani Rupee.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Northwestern University (US), Aga Khan University (PK), Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center (PK), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Civil Hospital Karachi (PK), Aga Khan University Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.