Becoming Uniquely Urban: A Small City’s Socio-Environmental Development Since 1945

Recent scholarship has called for renewed critical interest in both small cities and urban-environmental relationships. Work focusing on small city economic development as a socio-environmental process is well-positioned to address both of these calls. In this article, I track the small city of Geneva, New York’s socio-environmental development since 1945, using primary and secondary archival documents including planning and natural resource reports, personal correspondences, meeting minutes, and newspaper stories. I ask: how and why have developers engaged with nature to make and remake—and in doing so, imagine and reimagine—the small city through time? I find that local developers remade and reimagined the small city’s connectedness to nature to portray Geneva as urban, rural, or both in response to shifting economic opportunities. Geneva’s official “urban” status, small scale, and proximity to scenic nature played into a “uniquely urban” brand that developers used to bolster economic growth. In this way, developers render the small city a growth machine in ways that are comparable to both larger cities and smaller rural places. These findings shed greater light on the varying political-economic processes and relationships between larger “urban” and smaller “rural” places.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
City and Community
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15356841251341260
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Becoming Uniquely Urban: A Small City’s Socio-Environmental Development Since 1945

John Adams
City and Community
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Becoming Uniquely Urban: A Small City’s Socio-Environmental Development Since 1945

John Adams
article en

Abstract

Recent scholarship has called for renewed critical interest in both small cities and urban-environmental relationships. Work focusing on small city economic development as a socio-environmental process is well-positioned to address both of these calls. In this article, I track the small city of Geneva, New York’s socio-environmental development since 1945, using primary and secondary archival documents including planning and natural resource reports, personal correspondences, meeting minutes, and newspaper stories. I ask: how and why have developers engaged with nature to make and remake—and in doing so, imagine and reimagine—the small city through time? I find that local developers remade and reimagined the small city’s connectedness to nature to portray Geneva as urban, rural, or both in response to shifting economic opportunities. Geneva’s official “urban” status, small scale, and proximity to scenic nature played into a “uniquely urban” brand that developers used to bolster economic growth. In this way, developers render the small city a growth machine in ways that are comparable to both larger cities and smaller rural places. These findings shed greater light on the varying political-economic processes and relationships between larger “urban” and smaller “rural” places.

City and CommunityVol. 24(4)
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.