Orthopedic Residency Programs: What are Our Current Goals? An International Society of Orthopedic Centers (ISOC) Delphi Consensus

Strengths: This is an international effort to standardize and elevate orthopedic residency training with a diverse panel of experts, ensuring that the consensus reflects a wide range of perspectives across different healthcare systems. The high level of agreement on many key recommendations provides a clear framework for educational institutions. Limitations: The variability in training needs and resources among institutions may limit applicability. The inherent subjectivity of the Delphi method also remains a consideration when interpreting the consensus data. Future Perspectives: We offer a blueprint for the evolution of orthopedic residency programs. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies that evaluate the impact on resident competence and patient outcomes. Exploring adaptive curricular models and sustainable funding mechanisms may help training programs to remain both cutting edge and contextually relevant. Future ISOC meetings will include follow-up surveys to evaluate modifications to the curriculum at these centers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316251337359
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Orthopedic Residency Programs: What are Our Current Goals? An International Society of Orthopedic Centers (ISOC) Delphi Consensus

Stefano Zaffagnini, José Tomás Arteaga, Rafael A. Calvo, Felipe Toro et al.
2 citations
HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery
Innovations in Medical Education
3.76
article

Orthopedic Residency Programs: What are Our Current Goals? An International Society of Orthopedic Centers (ISOC) Delphi Consensus

Stefano Zaffagnini, José Tomás Arteaga, Rafael A. Calvo, Felipe Toro, Tobias Winkler, Rodrigo Guiloff, Parag Sancheti, Fernando Radice, Sebastián Irarrázaval, David Figueroa, Carolina Acuña, Amar S. Ranawat, Meir Liebergall, Francisco Figueroa, Laura Pope Robbins, Magnus Tägil, Alex Vaisman, Mário Lenza, Mathias P. Bostrom, Domenico Alesi, M. Stegeman, T. Jung, Luis Moya
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Strengths: This is an international effort to standardize and elevate orthopedic residency training with a diverse panel of experts, ensuring that the consensus reflects a wide range of perspectives across different healthcare systems. The high level of agreement on many key recommendations provides a clear framework for educational institutions. Limitations: The variability in training needs and resources among institutions may limit applicability. The inherent subjectivity of the Delphi method also remains a consideration when interpreting the consensus data. Future Perspectives: We offer a blueprint for the evolution of orthopedic residency programs. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies that evaluate the impact on resident competence and patient outcomes. Exploring adaptive curricular models and sustainable funding mechanisms may help training programs to remain both cutting edge and contextually relevant. Future ISOC meetings will include follow-up surveys to evaluate modifications to the curriculum at these centers.

HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special SurgeryVol. 22(2)
Hospital for Special Surgery (US), Universidad del Desarrollo (CL), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Lund University (SE), Universidad de Los Andes, Chile (CL), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), Clínica Alemana (CL), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IT), Sancheti Institute For Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation (IN), Sint Maartenskliniek (NL), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovations in Medical Education
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.