Investigation of radiology professionals’ awareness of CT head artifacts

A cross-sectional survey study included 150 participants. All participants' average knowledge score of CT head artifact was good (77.81%). The most correctly identified CT head artifacts were the metal artifact (86%), ring artifact (84.7%), and motion artifact (81.3%). The beam hardening artifact was correctly identified less frequently (62%). There is significant difference in the recognition of motion artifacts among the participants (P = 0.001) knowledge of CT head image artifacts improved significantly with more experienced participants (P = 0.001), where participants with less than 10 months of experience had a higher rate of incorrect responses (85 incorrect vs. 31 correct). The recognition of these artifacts improves with experience and advanced age. Understanding these artifacts is essential to avoid misdiagnosis of various diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Research Notes
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07300-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of radiology professionals’ awareness of CT head artifacts

Awadia Gareeballah, Amel F Alzain, Maisa Elzaki, Awatif Omer et al.
1 citations
BMC Research Notes
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
0.67
article

Investigation of radiology professionals’ awareness of CT head artifacts

Awadia Gareeballah, Amel F Alzain, Maisa Elzaki, Awatif Omer, Maher M. Aljohani, Abdullah Fahad A. Alshamrani, Ahmed Alenezi, Erizal Mukhtar, Moawia Bushra Gameraddin, Abdulaziz A. Qurashi, Abdalrahim Tagelsir Elsayed, Renad Albadrani, Osama Ahmed Alasiri, Omar Adel Almutairi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A cross-sectional survey study included 150 participants. All participants' average knowledge score of CT head artifact was good (77.81%). The most correctly identified CT head artifacts were the metal artifact (86%), ring artifact (84.7%), and motion artifact (81.3%). The beam hardening artifact was correctly identified less frequently (62%). There is significant difference in the recognition of motion artifacts among the participants (P = 0.001) knowledge of CT head image artifacts improved significantly with more experienced participants (P = 0.001), where participants with less than 10 months of experience had a higher rate of incorrect responses (85 incorrect vs. 31 correct). The recognition of these artifacts improves with experience and advanced age. Understanding these artifacts is essential to avoid misdiagnosis of various diseases.

BMC Research NotesVol. 18(1)
Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital (SA), Alzaiem Alazhari University (SD), Taibah University (SA), King Abdulaziz Medical City (SA), Prince Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital (SA), King Khalid University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigation of radiology professionals’ awareness of CT head artifacts — Awadia Gareeballah, Amel F Alzain, et al. · BMC Research Notes (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS