Multiple teams and the volunteer’s dilemma

We study the volunteer’s dilemma if the set of possible volunteers is partitioned into small teams that can coordinate internally but not across teams. If coordination is costless, the aggregate equilibrium payoff is determined by the number of teams only. The team size is relevant for individual players’ payoffs. They prefer larger teams. The optimality of the team structure is also considered if the coordination cost in teams is an increasing and strictly convex function of team size. Such costs can make very large teams suboptimal. Also, such costs suggest a partitioning into teams of roughly equal size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rationality and Society
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10434631251341703
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiple teams and the volunteer’s dilemma

Kai A. Konrad
3 citations
Rationality and Society
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
7.10
article

Multiple teams and the volunteer’s dilemma

Kai A. Konrad
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We study the volunteer’s dilemma if the set of possible volunteers is partitioned into small teams that can coordinate internally but not across teams. If coordination is costless, the aggregate equilibrium payoff is determined by the number of teams only. The team size is relevant for individual players’ payoffs. They prefer larger teams. The optimality of the team structure is also considered if the coordination cost in teams is an increasing and strictly convex function of team size. Such costs can make very large teams suboptimal. Also, such costs suggest a partitioning into teams of roughly equal size.

Rationality and SocietyVol. 37(3)
Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
7.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.