Hip Arthroscopy Patients Experiencing Greater Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage are More Likely to Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Functional Outcomes at 1-Year Follow-up

Objectives: The purpose of the present study is to investigate the influence of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status (SES) on functional outcomes following hip arthroscopy. Methods: This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data queried patients aged ≥18 years with minimum 1-year follow-up who underwent hip arthroscopy for the treatment of symptomatic labral tears secondary to FAI. The study population was divided into ADI Low and ADI High cohorts according to ADI score, a validated measurement of neighborhood-level SES standardized to yield a score between 1 and 100. Collected patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) included the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS)–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), HOS–Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33), VAS pain score, and patient satisfaction. Results: 228 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. After stratifying patients by ADI score, the ADI Low (n = 113; mean ADI: 5.8 ± 3.0; range: 1 to 12) and ADI High (n=115; mean ADI: 28.0 ± 14.5; range: 13 to 97) cohorts had no differences in baseline patient demographics. ADI High patients reported significantly worse pre-operative baseline scores for all 5 PROMs; however, these differences were not present by 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, patients in both cohorts achieved similar rates of MCID for all 5 PROMs and PASS for 4 PROMs. When controlling for patient demographics, patients with higher ADI scores had greater odds of achieving MCID for all PROMs except for iHOT-33. Conclusions: Although hip arthroscopy patients experiencing greater neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage exhibited significantly lower preoperative baseline scores, this disparity resolved at 1-year follow-up. In fact, when adjusting for patient characteristics including ADI score, more disadvantaged patients achieved greater odds of achieving MCID. The present study is merely a first step towards understanding health inequities among patients seeking orthopaedic care. Further development of clinical guidelines and health policy research are necessary to advance care for patients from disadvantaged communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967125s00012
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hip disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hip Arthroscopy Patients Experiencing Greater Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage are More Likely to Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Functional Outcomes at 1-Year Follow-up

Kieran Dowley, Jeffrey Mun, Stephen M. Gillinov, Bilal Siddiq et al.
1 citations
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Hip disorders and treatments
2.01
article

Hip Arthroscopy Patients Experiencing Greater Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage are More Likely to Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Functional Outcomes at 1-Year Follow-up

Kieran Dowley, Jeffrey Mun, Stephen M. Gillinov, Bilal Siddiq, Nathan J. Cherian, Scott D. Martin, Rohit R. Rachala, Rachel Poutre
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the present study is to investigate the influence of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status (SES) on functional outcomes following hip arthroscopy. Methods: This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data queried patients aged ≥18 years with minimum 1-year follow-up who underwent hip arthroscopy for the treatment of symptomatic labral tears secondary to FAI. The study population was divided into ADI Low and ADI High cohorts according to ADI score, a validated measurement of neighborhood-level SES standardized to yield a score between 1 and 100. Collected patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) included the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS)–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), HOS–Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33), VAS pain score, and patient satisfaction. Results: 228 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. After stratifying patients by ADI score, the ADI Low (n = 113; mean ADI: 5.8 ± 3.0; range: 1 to 12) and ADI High (n=115; mean ADI: 28.0 ± 14.5; range: 13 to 97) cohorts had no differences in baseline patient demographics. ADI High patients reported significantly worse pre-operative baseline scores for all 5 PROMs; however, these differences were not present by 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, patients in both cohorts achieved similar rates of MCID for all 5 PROMs and PASS for 4 PROMs. When controlling for patient demographics, patients with higher ADI scores had greater odds of achieving MCID for all PROMs except for iHOT-33. Conclusions: Although hip arthroscopy patients experiencing greater neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage exhibited significantly lower preoperative baseline scores, this disparity resolved at 1-year follow-up. In fact, when adjusting for patient characteristics including ADI score, more disadvantaged patients achieved greater odds of achieving MCID. The present study is merely a first step towards understanding health inequities among patients seeking orthopaedic care. Further development of clinical guidelines and health policy research are necessary to advance care for patients from disadvantaged communities.

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports MedicineVol. 13(5_suppl1)
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Hip disorders and treatments
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.