Bispecific innate cell engager (ICE) AFM24 in combination with atezolizumab in patients with advanced/metastatic <i>EGFR</i> -expressing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver mutations: Initial results from a phase 2a study.

2609 Background: Novel treatments are needed for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC without actionable driver mutations who progress after prior therapies including checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and platinum-based chemotherapy. AFM24 is a tetravalent, bispecific ICE that binds CD16A on NK cells and macrophages and EGFR on solid tumors, redirecting and enhancing the innate and possibly the adaptive immune response. The EGFR -wildtype ( EGFR -WT) NSCLC expansion cohort of the Phase 1/2a study (NCT05109442) is evaluating the combination of AFM24 and atezolizumab. Methods: AFM24 is given weekly at 480 mg intravenously (IV) in combination with 840 mg atezolizumab IV fortnightly to patients with advanced or metastatic EGFR -WT NSCLC who progressed on ≥1 prior line of therapy, including at least a platinum doublet and a CPI. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1 by Investigator assessment. Secondary endpoints include safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Treatment is given in 28-day cycles until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, investigator discretion, or patient withdrawal of consent. Results: As of 15 January 2025, 43 patients received AFM24 and atezolizumab for a mean (range) duration of 19.6 (1–78) weeks. Median (range) age is 67 (40–79) years; 72% male; all patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (14%) or 1 (86%). Median (range) number of prior lines is 2 (1–7). All patients had discontinued their previous CPI treatment due to progressive disease. The combination was well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities; infusion-related reactions, the most common adverse events (AE), were reported in 54% of patients (28 Grade 1–2, 4 Grade 3). Most common ≥G3 treatment-related AEs were ALT/AST elevations in 2 patients, all fully resolved. The 35 response-evaluable patients showed an ORR of 23% (8 responses: 1 complete response, 7 partial responses), tumor shrinkage in 46% (16/35) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 77%. Of the 8 responders, 6 had never achieved an objective response on prior CPIs. Preliminary median progression-free survival (PFS) is 5.5 months (95% CI 2.9–7.4), with 29% of patients still on treatment. Conclusions: AFM24 in combination with atezolizumab shows promising clinical efficacy in patients who failed prior treatment including platinum-based chemotherapy and CPI. Patients showed a tolerable and well-managed safety profile. A considerable DCR of 77%, with some long, sustained responses was observed. Confirmed responses were achieved in patients who had not responded to prior CPI. This combination treatment approach could offer a promising chemotherapy-free alternative to patients who have exhausted the available therapeutic options and could provide a strategy to overcome resistance to prior CPI. Clinical trial information: NCT05109442 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.2609
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bispecific innate cell engager (ICE) AFM24 in combination with atezolizumab in patients with advanced/metastatic EGFR -expressing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver mutations: Initial results from a phase 2a study.

Byoung Yong Shim, Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, Rodryg Ramlau, Jacob Thomas et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
2.72
article

Bispecific innate cell engager (ICE) AFM24 in combination with atezolizumab in patients with advanced/metastatic EGFR -expressing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver mutations: Initial results from a phase 2a study.

Byoung Yong Shim, Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, Rodryg Ramlau, Jacob Thomas, Michael Emig, Valentina Boni, Wojciech Rogowski, Kerstin Pietzko, Iwona Ługowska, Hye Ryun Kim, Cezary Szczylik, Eric S. Christenson, Ulrike Gärtner, Juanita Suzanne Lopez, A. Oberoi, Daniel Schütz, Omar Saavedra, Marina Chiara Garassino, Andrés Cervantes, Daniela Morales-Espinosa
article en
2 citations

Abstract

2609 Background: Novel treatments are needed for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC without actionable driver mutations who progress after prior therapies including checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and platinum-based chemotherapy. AFM24 is a tetravalent, bispecific ICE that binds CD16A on NK cells and macrophages and EGFR on solid tumors, redirecting and enhancing the innate and possibly the adaptive immune response. The EGFR -wildtype ( EGFR -WT) NSCLC expansion cohort of the Phase 1/2a study (NCT05109442) is evaluating the combination of AFM24 and atezolizumab. Methods: AFM24 is given weekly at 480 mg intravenously (IV) in combination with 840 mg atezolizumab IV fortnightly to patients with advanced or metastatic EGFR -WT NSCLC who progressed on ≥1 prior line of therapy, including at least a platinum doublet and a CPI. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1 by Investigator assessment. Secondary endpoints include safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Treatment is given in 28-day cycles until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, investigator discretion, or patient withdrawal of consent. Results: As of 15 January 2025, 43 patients received AFM24 and atezolizumab for a mean (range) duration of 19.6 (1–78) weeks. Median (range) age is 67 (40–79) years; 72% male; all patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (14%) or 1 (86%). Median (range) number of prior lines is 2 (1–7). All patients had discontinued their previous CPI treatment due to progressive disease. The combination was well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities; infusion-related reactions, the most common adverse events (AE), were reported in 54% of patients (28 Grade 1–2, 4 Grade 3). Most common ≥G3 treatment-related AEs were ALT/AST elevations in 2 patients, all fully resolved. The 35 response-evaluable patients showed an ORR of 23% (8 responses: 1 complete response, 7 partial responses), tumor shrinkage in 46% (16/35) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 77%. Of the 8 responders, 6 had never achieved an objective response on prior CPIs. Preliminary median progression-free survival (PFS) is 5.5 months (95% CI 2.9–7.4), with 29% of patients still on treatment. Conclusions: AFM24 in combination with atezolizumab shows promising clinical efficacy in patients who failed prior treatment including platinum-based chemotherapy and CPI. Patients showed a tolerable and well-managed safety profile. A considerable DCR of 77%, with some long, sustained responses was observed. Confirmed responses were achieved in patients who had not responded to prior CPI. This combination treatment approach could offer a promising chemotherapy-free alternative to patients who have exhausted the available therapeutic options and could provide a strategy to overcome resistance to prior CPI. Clinical trial information: NCT05109442 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of Southern California (US), Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL), Institute of Cancer Research (GB), Johns Hopkins University (US), Yonsei University (KR), Fryderyk Chopin University of Music (PL), University of Chicago (US), The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital (KR), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia (ES), Janusz Korczak Pedagogical University in Warsaw (PL), Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid (ES), Affimed Therapeutics (Germany) (DE), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US), The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
2.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.