Association of neurocognitive impairment and financial hardship in adult survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS).

10055 Background: Adult survivors of childhood cancer are at high risk for financial hardship due to the cumulative lifetime costs of cancer-directed therapy and chronic health conditions. Whether neurocognitive impairment increases the risk for financial hardship is unknown. Methods: Childhood cancer survivors (≥ 5-year survivors, diagnosed < 21 years of age between 1970-1999) enrolled in CCSS completed a validated self-report Neurocognitive Questionnaire (NCQ) in 2014 and a subsequent financial hardship survey (age ≥ 26 at survey completion) 3 years later. The NCQ measured neurocognitive impairment in four domains: (1) memory ; (2) task efficiency; (3) organization; (4) emotional regulation. NCQ was the exposure and operationalized as the number of impaired domains (0-4); in each domain, impairment was defined as a Z-score >90 th percentile. Financial hardship outcomes were measured in behavioral (e.g., delaying care due to cost), material (e.g., high out-of-pocket costs), and psychological (e.g., worry about financial situation) domains, as well as two discrete outcomes of debt collection and bankruptcy. Multivariable linear and logistic regressions were used to analyze associations adjusting for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Results: 3023 survivors completed the NCQ (mean age 38.8, SD=8.6 years) and a subsequent financial hardship survey (mean age 41.5, SD=8.7 years). 13.9%, 8.1%, 6.0%, and 2.6% of survivors had neurocognitive impairments in 1-4 domains, respectively. Individuals with NCQ impairment had significantly higher mean standardized scores across all three financial hardship domains than those without NCQ impairments (Table). Each ordinal increase in the number of impaired NCQ domains was associated with a higher mean standardized score for both behavioral and material financial hardship. Individuals with impairments in all four NCQ domains were more likely to be sent to debt collection (54% vs. 25%, OR=3.82, 95% CI: 2.27-6.43) and file for bankruptcy protection (21% vs. 8%, OR=2.81, 95% CI: 1.53-5.17) compared to those without impairments. Conclusions: Cancer survivors with neurocognitive impairment are particularly vulnerable to financial hardship. This survivor population should be specifically assessed for these outcomes and offered support to prevent and mitigate financial challenges. Standardized mean differences (SMD) of each financial hardship domain by number of NCQ impairments compared to no NCQ impairments. Number of NCQ domains impaired Behavioral Domain SMD (95% CI) Material DomainSMD (95% CI) Psychological DomainSMD (95% CI) 1 0.21 (0.11-0.31) 0.20 (0.10-0.29) 0.41 (0.31-0.50) 2 0.39 (0.27-0.51) 0.32 (0.20-0.44) 0.38 (0.25-0.50) 3 0.48 (0.34-0.63) 0.35 (0.20-0.49) 0.44 (0.30-0.58) 4 0.72 (0.51-0.93) 0.72 (0.52-0.94) 0.74 (0.53-0.94)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.10055
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of neurocognitive impairment and financial hardship in adult survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS).

Elyse Richelle Park, Shalini Bhatia, K. Robin Yabroff, Yutaka Yasui et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
article

Association of neurocognitive impairment and financial hardship in adult survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS).

Elyse Richelle Park, Shalini Bhatia, K. Robin Yabroff, Yutaka Yasui, Daniel J. Zheng, Richard Aplenc, Paul Craig Nathan, Claire Snyder, Sogol Mostoufi‐Moab, I‐Chan Huang, Anne C. Kirchhoff, Kim Edelstein, Pim Brouwers, Gregory T. Armstrong, Kelly Getz, Tara M. Brinkman, Kevin R. Krull, Kira O'Neil Bona, Sedigheh Mirzaei
article en

Abstract

10055 Background: Adult survivors of childhood cancer are at high risk for financial hardship due to the cumulative lifetime costs of cancer-directed therapy and chronic health conditions. Whether neurocognitive impairment increases the risk for financial hardship is unknown. Methods: Childhood cancer survivors (≥ 5-year survivors, diagnosed < 21 years of age between 1970-1999) enrolled in CCSS completed a validated self-report Neurocognitive Questionnaire (NCQ) in 2014 and a subsequent financial hardship survey (age ≥ 26 at survey completion) 3 years later. The NCQ measured neurocognitive impairment in four domains: (1) memory ; (2) task efficiency; (3) organization; (4) emotional regulation. NCQ was the exposure and operationalized as the number of impaired domains (0-4); in each domain, impairment was defined as a Z-score >90 th percentile. Financial hardship outcomes were measured in behavioral (e.g., delaying care due to cost), material (e.g., high out-of-pocket costs), and psychological (e.g., worry about financial situation) domains, as well as two discrete outcomes of debt collection and bankruptcy. Multivariable linear and logistic regressions were used to analyze associations adjusting for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Results: 3023 survivors completed the NCQ (mean age 38.8, SD=8.6 years) and a subsequent financial hardship survey (mean age 41.5, SD=8.7 years). 13.9%, 8.1%, 6.0%, and 2.6% of survivors had neurocognitive impairments in 1-4 domains, respectively. Individuals with NCQ impairment had significantly higher mean standardized scores across all three financial hardship domains than those without NCQ impairments (Table). Each ordinal increase in the number of impaired NCQ domains was associated with a higher mean standardized score for both behavioral and material financial hardship. Individuals with impairments in all four NCQ domains were more likely to be sent to debt collection (54% vs. 25%, OR=3.82, 95% CI: 2.27-6.43) and file for bankruptcy protection (21% vs. 8%, OR=2.81, 95% CI: 1.53-5.17) compared to those without impairments. Conclusions: Cancer survivors with neurocognitive impairment are particularly vulnerable to financial hardship. This survivor population should be specifically assessed for these outcomes and offered support to prevent and mitigate financial challenges. Standardized mean differences (SMD) of each financial hardship domain by number of NCQ impairments compared to no NCQ impairments. Number of NCQ domains impaired Behavioral Domain SMD (95% CI) Material DomainSMD (95% CI) Psychological DomainSMD (95% CI) 1 0.21 (0.11-0.31) 0.20 (0.10-0.29) 0.41 (0.31-0.50) 2 0.39 (0.27-0.51) 0.32 (0.20-0.44) 0.38 (0.25-0.50) 3 0.48 (0.34-0.63) 0.35 (0.20-0.49) 0.44 (0.30-0.58) 4 0.72 (0.51-0.93) 0.72 (0.52-0.94) 0.74 (0.53-0.94)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
American Cancer Society (US), National Institutes of Health (US), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US), University Health Network (CA), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Utah (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), Hospital for Sick Children (CA), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.