Final results of afatinib plus chemotherapy with genomic profiling in osimertinib-refractory EGFR-mutant NSCLC: NEJ025B.

8596 Background: Osimertinib is commonly used as a first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. However, the optimal treatment following osimertinib failure remains unclear. This study evaluated afatinib plus chemotherapy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC resistant to osimertinib. Initial findings were presented at ASCO2023, and this report provides final data, including blood NGS analysis. Methods: Patients (pts) with EGFR mutations (Del19 or L858R) after osimertinib failure were treated with afatinib (20 mg daily) combined with carboplatin (AUC5 mg/mL/min) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m² every 3 weeks), followed by maintenance therapy with afatinib plus pemetrexed until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the 6-month progression-free survival rate (6M-PFSR). Secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, ORR, DOR, and safety. Blood samples were collected before and during treatment, and at progression, to evaluate biomarkers using CAPP-SEQ. Results: Between June 7, 2020, and January 19, 2022, 36 pts were enrolled. One pt met exclusion criteria, leaving 35 pts for efficacy analysis. The mean age was 70 years; 60% were women, and 54.3% were nonsmokers. The median observation period was 29.1 months (cutoff date: January 18, 2024). The primary endpoint, 6M-PFSR, was 57.1% (95% CI, 39.3–71.5), exceeding the threshold of 35%. Notably, 28.6% of pts achieved long-term PFS of ≥1 year. ORR was 51.4%, DCR was 88.6%, median PFS was 8.2 months, median DOR was 5.6 months, and median OS was 22.5 months. By mutation type, ORRs were similar for Del19 and L858R (46.7% and 55.0%, respectively), but median PFS was longer for Del19 than for L858R (9.6 vs. 5.2 months). Pts who had responded to prior osimertinib (CR/PR, n=29) had longer median PFS than non-responders (SD/PD/NE, n=6) (8.5 vs. 5.8 months). Adverse events (AEs) from TKI and chemotherapy were common but manageable. The most frequent AEs were diarrhea (52.8%), anorexia (47.2%), fatigue (36.1%), and paronychia (36.1%). Interstitial pneumonia occurred in 3 pts (8.3%), with one treatment-related death. In plasma NGS analysis, clearance of EGFR mutations during treatment was a key predictive factor. Pts without EGFR mutation clearance had shorter PFS and OS compared to those with clearance (PFS: 5.7 vs. 12.0 months; OS: 15.7 vs. 34.4 months). Efficacy was observed even in pts with p53 mutations, a known resistance factor. MET gene amplification was detected in 4 pts upon resistance. Conclusions: Afatinib combined with platinum-based chemotherapy demonstrated satisfactory efficacy and manageable toxicity in pts with tumors refractory to osimertinib. EGFR mutation clearance during treatment was predictive of therapeutic outcomes. This regimen may be a promising second-line option after osimertinib failure. Clinical trial information: 021200005 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.8596
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Final results of afatinib plus chemotherapy with genomic profiling in osimertinib-refractory EGFR-mutant NSCLC: NEJ025B.

Aya Suzuki, Makoto Maemondo, Jun Sugisaka, Kazuko Sakai et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Final results of afatinib plus chemotherapy with genomic profiling in osimertinib-refractory EGFR-mutant NSCLC: NEJ025B.

Aya Suzuki, Makoto Maemondo, Jun Sugisaka, Kazuko Sakai, Eisaku Miyauchi, Fumiaki Takahashi, Yu Utsumi, Koichi Azuma, Masahiro Seike, Akira Kisohara, Hajime Asahina, Akihiko Miyanaga, Tatsuro Fukuhara, H. Tanaka, Hiromi Nagashima, Naoki Furuya, Kazuhisa Nakashima, Haruna Sato, Kazuto Nishio, Ryota Kanemaru
article en

Abstract

8596 Background: Osimertinib is commonly used as a first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. However, the optimal treatment following osimertinib failure remains unclear. This study evaluated afatinib plus chemotherapy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC resistant to osimertinib. Initial findings were presented at ASCO2023, and this report provides final data, including blood NGS analysis. Methods: Patients (pts) with EGFR mutations (Del19 or L858R) after osimertinib failure were treated with afatinib (20 mg daily) combined with carboplatin (AUC5 mg/mL/min) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m² every 3 weeks), followed by maintenance therapy with afatinib plus pemetrexed until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the 6-month progression-free survival rate (6M-PFSR). Secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, ORR, DOR, and safety. Blood samples were collected before and during treatment, and at progression, to evaluate biomarkers using CAPP-SEQ. Results: Between June 7, 2020, and January 19, 2022, 36 pts were enrolled. One pt met exclusion criteria, leaving 35 pts for efficacy analysis. The mean age was 70 years; 60% were women, and 54.3% were nonsmokers. The median observation period was 29.1 months (cutoff date: January 18, 2024). The primary endpoint, 6M-PFSR, was 57.1% (95% CI, 39.3–71.5), exceeding the threshold of 35%. Notably, 28.6% of pts achieved long-term PFS of ≥1 year. ORR was 51.4%, DCR was 88.6%, median PFS was 8.2 months, median DOR was 5.6 months, and median OS was 22.5 months. By mutation type, ORRs were similar for Del19 and L858R (46.7% and 55.0%, respectively), but median PFS was longer for Del19 than for L858R (9.6 vs. 5.2 months). Pts who had responded to prior osimertinib (CR/PR, n=29) had longer median PFS than non-responders (SD/PD/NE, n=6) (8.5 vs. 5.8 months). Adverse events (AEs) from TKI and chemotherapy were common but manageable. The most frequent AEs were diarrhea (52.8%), anorexia (47.2%), fatigue (36.1%), and paronychia (36.1%). Interstitial pneumonia occurred in 3 pts (8.3%), with one treatment-related death. In plasma NGS analysis, clearance of EGFR mutations during treatment was a key predictive factor. Pts without EGFR mutation clearance had shorter PFS and OS compared to those with clearance (PFS: 5.7 vs. 12.0 months; OS: 15.7 vs. 34.4 months). Efficacy was observed even in pts with p53 mutations, a known resistance factor. MET gene amplification was detected in 4 pts upon resistance. Conclusions: Afatinib combined with platinum-based chemotherapy demonstrated satisfactory efficacy and manageable toxicity in pts with tumors refractory to osimertinib. EGFR mutation clearance during treatment was predictive of therapeutic outcomes. This regimen may be a promising second-line option after osimertinib failure. Clinical trial information: 021200005 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Kurume University (JP), Jichi Medical University (JP), Hirosaki University (JP), St. Marianna University School of Medicine (JP), Shimane University (JP), Iwate Medical University (JP), Hokkaido University (JP), Juntendo University (JP), Tohoku University Hospital (JP), Miyagi Prefectural Hospital Organization (JP), Sendai Kousei Hospital (JP), Nippon Medical School (JP), Kindai University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.