Real-world efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil and bevacizumab combination according to baseline prognostic factors: The BeTAS study.

3578 Background: The Sunlight Trial demonstrated that trifluridine-tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and bevacizumab (BEV) significantly improved Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after two treatment lines. However, the real-world efficacy and influence of baseline prognostic factors are not fully understood. Methods: This retrospective, observational, multicenter study across 18 Spanish hospitals included mCRC patients treated with FTD/TPI+BEV in a real-world setting. Prognostic factors were analyzed, including Tabernero's subgroups, which categorize patients according to time to diagnosis from first metastasis ( < 18 vs. > 18 months), number of metastatic sites ( < 3 vs. > 3), and liver metastasis (yes vs. no). Patients were grouped into Best (BPC), Good (GPC), and Poor (PPC) prognostic categories. Results: 398 patients were treated from July 2019 to December 2024. Median age was 67 years (range 26-92), 65.8% male, and 88.4% had ECOG PS 0-1. 56.3% had RAS mutations. Liver metastases were present in 75.3%, 27.7% had > 3 metastatic sites, and 28.2% had < 18 months from diagnosis of first metastasis, resulting in 47.2% of patients categorized as PPC. 67.8% received FTD/TPI+BEV as third-line treatment. ORR was 6.8%, and DCR was 49.9%. With a median follow-up of 14 months, median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.1-5.1) and OS was 10.8 months (95% CI, 9.2-12.4). Neutropenia was the most common toxicity, with 33.1% of patients experiencing grade 3-4 neutropenia. OS by ECOG PS 0 vs. 1 vs. 2 was 12.5 vs. 11.1 vs. 5.7 months (p < 0.0001). PFS by ECOG PS 0 vs. 1 vs. 2 was 5.6 vs. 4.9 vs. 3.5 months (p = 0.102). OS by BPC vs. GPC vs. PPC was 18.3 vs. 12.8 vs. 7.5 months (p < 0.0001), and PFS was 7.3 vs. 5.8 vs. 3.7 months (p < 0.0001). OS in patients with grade 3-4 neutropenia vs. no neutropenia was 17.7 vs. 8.1 months (p < 0.0001), and PFS was 8.7 vs. 3.9 months (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our series confirms the effectiveness of FTD/TPI + BEV in real-world clinical practice, with a median OS of 10.8 months and a median PFS of 4.9 months. The ECOG performance status, Tabernero subgroups, and the occurrence of grade 3-4 neutropenia help identify patients who may obtain the maximum benefit from FTD/TPI + BEV treatment. Interestingly, all subgroups analyzed showed a greater benefit compared to the outcomes previously reported for FTD/TPI monotherapy, highlighting the potential of this combination in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.3578
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil and bevacizumab combination according to baseline prognostic factors: The BeTAS study.

Ana Fernández Montés, Elena Gallardo Martín, María Pilar Ochoa Rivas, Marcos Melián-Sosa et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
2.09
article

Real-world efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil and bevacizumab combination according to baseline prognostic factors: The BeTAS study.

Ana Fernández Montés, Elena Gallardo Martín, María Pilar Ochoa Rivas, Marcos Melián-Sosa, Maria Martelo, Marta Llanos, Luis Cabezón‐Gutiérrez, B. Gomez, Ana Mariá López, Antia Cousillas Castiñeira, David Gutiérrez Abad, A.M. Jiménez Gordo, Ana López, Reyes Ferreiro, Nieves Martínez Lago, Maria Carmen Riesco Martinez, Margarita Reboredo López, Paula Carla Antonilli
article en
2 citations

Abstract

3578 Background: The Sunlight Trial demonstrated that trifluridine-tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and bevacizumab (BEV) significantly improved Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after two treatment lines. However, the real-world efficacy and influence of baseline prognostic factors are not fully understood. Methods: This retrospective, observational, multicenter study across 18 Spanish hospitals included mCRC patients treated with FTD/TPI+BEV in a real-world setting. Prognostic factors were analyzed, including Tabernero's subgroups, which categorize patients according to time to diagnosis from first metastasis ( < 18 vs. > 18 months), number of metastatic sites ( < 3 vs. > 3), and liver metastasis (yes vs. no). Patients were grouped into Best (BPC), Good (GPC), and Poor (PPC) prognostic categories. Results: 398 patients were treated from July 2019 to December 2024. Median age was 67 years (range 26-92), 65.8% male, and 88.4% had ECOG PS 0-1. 56.3% had RAS mutations. Liver metastases were present in 75.3%, 27.7% had > 3 metastatic sites, and 28.2% had < 18 months from diagnosis of first metastasis, resulting in 47.2% of patients categorized as PPC. 67.8% received FTD/TPI+BEV as third-line treatment. ORR was 6.8%, and DCR was 49.9%. With a median follow-up of 14 months, median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.1-5.1) and OS was 10.8 months (95% CI, 9.2-12.4). Neutropenia was the most common toxicity, with 33.1% of patients experiencing grade 3-4 neutropenia. OS by ECOG PS 0 vs. 1 vs. 2 was 12.5 vs. 11.1 vs. 5.7 months (p < 0.0001). PFS by ECOG PS 0 vs. 1 vs. 2 was 5.6 vs. 4.9 vs. 3.5 months (p = 0.102). OS by BPC vs. GPC vs. PPC was 18.3 vs. 12.8 vs. 7.5 months (p < 0.0001), and PFS was 7.3 vs. 5.8 vs. 3.7 months (p < 0.0001). OS in patients with grade 3-4 neutropenia vs. no neutropenia was 17.7 vs. 8.1 months (p < 0.0001), and PFS was 8.7 vs. 3.9 months (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our series confirms the effectiveness of FTD/TPI + BEV in real-world clinical practice, with a median OS of 10.8 months and a median PFS of 4.9 months. The ECOG performance status, Tabernero subgroups, and the occurrence of grade 3-4 neutropenia help identify patients who may obtain the maximum benefit from FTD/TPI + BEV treatment. Interestingly, all subgroups analyzed showed a greater benefit compared to the outcomes previously reported for FTD/TPI monotherapy, highlighting the potential of this combination in clinical practice.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Universidade da Coruña (ES), Instituto Cajal (ES), Hospital Universitario de Canarias (ES), University Hospital Complex Of Vigo (ES), Hospital Universitario de Torrejón (ES), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (ES), Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín (ES), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES), Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (ES), Hospital Universitario de Burgos (ES), Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (ES), Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (ES), Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (ES), Complejo Hospitalario de Pontevedra (ES), Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía (ES), Hospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla (ES), Complejo Hospitalario de Ourense (ES), Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.