Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the C-POST trial of adjuvant cemiplimab (cemi) vs placebo (pbo) for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC).

6065 Background: C-POST is a phase 3, double-blind, pbo-controlled trial (NCT03969004) of adjuvant cemi for treatment of patients (pts) with CSCC at high risk of recurrence after surgery and radiation therapy. Positive results for the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) at interim analysis 1 are reported in a separate ASCO abstract. Here we evaluate adjuvant cemi vs pbo on PROs as exploratory endpoints. Methods: Pts (N=415) were randomized 1:1 to adjuvant cemi or pbo for up to 48 weeks (4 cycles). The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) was administered at Day 1 of every cycle, end of treatment, and during follow-up. The pre-specified PRO analysis focused on 6 QLQ-C30 scales of global health status (GHS)/QoL; 3 functional scales (physical [PF], role [RF], emotional [EF]); and 2 symptom scales (fatigue [FA], pain [PA]). Overall changes from baseline across treatment cycles were analyzed using mixed effects models for repeated measures; if 95% CIs did not cross zero, differences were considered of nominal statistical significance (α=0.05) as no adjustment was made for multiplicity. PRO responder analysis used a published threshold of 10 points for clinically meaningful change across scales; median time to first deterioration was determined using Kaplan–Meier analyses. Results: QLQ-C30 completion rates from baseline through all cycles were >88% in both arms. Baseline scores showed moderate-to-high GHS/QoL and functioning and low symptom burden (Table). Overall changes from baseline on QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL, functioning, and symptom scores were small and similar between arms (Table). In the PRO responder analysis, most pts in both arms reported maintenance or clinically meaningful improvement in QoL in all scales across all cycles (cemi: 55.9–86.8%; pbo: 55.5–88.2%). Median time to first deterioration was also similar between arms in all scales (cemi: 5.3–25.6 months; pbo: 8.3–22.2 months). Conclusions: QoL was maintained during treatment with adjuvant cemi, with no clinically meaningful worsening vs pbo. These PRO results complement the observed improvement in DFS and support the favorable risk profile of adjuvant cemi for pts with high-risk CSCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03969004 . QLQ-C30 scale Baselinemean (SD) Overall LS mean change from baseline (95% CI) Difference (95% CI) Cemi (n=209) Pbo(n=206) Cemi(n=209) Pbo(n=206) GHS/QoL 75.4 (17.5) 75.8 (17.4) –2.0 (–4.3, 0.4) –1.0 (–3.4, 1.4) –0.9 (–3.7, 1.8) PF 87.1 (16.0) 90.6 (13.9) –1.4 (–3.2, 0.5) –1.9 (–3.9, 0.0) 0.5 (–1.7, 2.7) RF 83.8 (24.8) 84.2 (20.8) –4.2 (–7.3, –1.2) –1.6 (–4.8, 1.5) –2.6 (–6.2, 0.9) EF 84.6 (18.7) 85.1 (16.7) 0.2 (–2.2, 2.7) –0.4 (–2.9, 2.1) 0.7 (–2.2, 3.5) FA 20.9 (19.9) 20.5 (20.1) 5.0 (2.2, 7.7) 4.2 (1.4, 7.0) 0.8 (–2.4, 4.0) PA 14.7 (21.2) 13.1 (20.4) 3.2 (–0.1, 6.5) 2.1 (–1.3, 5.6) 1.1 (–2.8, 5.0)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.6065
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the C-POST trial of adjuvant cemiplimab (cemi) vs placebo (pbo) for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC).

Sandro Porceddu, Maite De Liz Vassen Schurmann, Alexander Guminski, Fiona Day et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
1.35
article

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the C-POST trial of adjuvant cemiplimab (cemi) vs placebo (pbo) for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC).

Sandro Porceddu, Maite De Liz Vassen Schurmann, Alexander Guminski, Fiona Day, Suk‐Young Yoo, Annette M. Lim, Flávio Augusto Ferreira da Silva, Lei Chi, Danny Rischin, Paola Queirolo, Matthew G. Fury, Vishal Patel, Camryn Joseph, Javier Cañueto, Alexander J. Stratigos, James Harnett, Shikha Bansal, Joanna Walker, Priscila Gonçalves, Chieh-I Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

6065 Background: C-POST is a phase 3, double-blind, pbo-controlled trial (NCT03969004) of adjuvant cemi for treatment of patients (pts) with CSCC at high risk of recurrence after surgery and radiation therapy. Positive results for the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) at interim analysis 1 are reported in a separate ASCO abstract. Here we evaluate adjuvant cemi vs pbo on PROs as exploratory endpoints. Methods: Pts (N=415) were randomized 1:1 to adjuvant cemi or pbo for up to 48 weeks (4 cycles). The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) was administered at Day 1 of every cycle, end of treatment, and during follow-up. The pre-specified PRO analysis focused on 6 QLQ-C30 scales of global health status (GHS)/QoL; 3 functional scales (physical [PF], role [RF], emotional [EF]); and 2 symptom scales (fatigue [FA], pain [PA]). Overall changes from baseline across treatment cycles were analyzed using mixed effects models for repeated measures; if 95% CIs did not cross zero, differences were considered of nominal statistical significance (α=0.05) as no adjustment was made for multiplicity. PRO responder analysis used a published threshold of 10 points for clinically meaningful change across scales; median time to first deterioration was determined using Kaplan–Meier analyses. Results: QLQ-C30 completion rates from baseline through all cycles were >88% in both arms. Baseline scores showed moderate-to-high GHS/QoL and functioning and low symptom burden (Table). Overall changes from baseline on QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL, functioning, and symptom scores were small and similar between arms (Table). In the PRO responder analysis, most pts in both arms reported maintenance or clinically meaningful improvement in QoL in all scales across all cycles (cemi: 55.9–86.8%; pbo: 55.5–88.2%). Median time to first deterioration was also similar between arms in all scales (cemi: 5.3–25.6 months; pbo: 8.3–22.2 months). Conclusions: QoL was maintained during treatment with adjuvant cemi, with no clinically meaningful worsening vs pbo. These PRO results complement the observed improvement in DFS and support the favorable risk profile of adjuvant cemi for pts with high-risk CSCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03969004 . QLQ-C30 scale Baselinemean (SD) Overall LS mean change from baseline (95% CI) Difference (95% CI) Cemi (n=209) Pbo(n=206) Cemi(n=209) Pbo(n=206) GHS/QoL 75.4 (17.5) 75.8 (17.4) –2.0 (–4.3, 0.4) –1.0 (–3.4, 1.4) –0.9 (–3.7, 1.8) PF 87.1 (16.0) 90.6 (13.9) –1.4 (–3.2, 0.5) –1.9 (–3.9, 0.0) 0.5 (–1.7, 2.7) RF 83.8 (24.8) 84.2 (20.8) –4.2 (–7.3, –1.2) –1.6 (–4.8, 1.5) –2.6 (–6.2, 0.9) EF 84.6 (18.7) 85.1 (16.7) 0.2 (–2.2, 2.7) –0.4 (–2.9, 2.1) 0.7 (–2.2, 3.5) FA 20.9 (19.9) 20.5 (20.1) 5.0 (2.2, 7.7) 4.2 (1.4, 7.0) 0.8 (–2.4, 4.0) PA 14.7 (21.2) 13.1 (20.4) 3.2 (–0.1, 6.5) 2.1 (–1.3, 5.6) 1.1 (–2.8, 5.0)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Universidad de Salamanca (ES), Regeneron (United States) (US), George Washington University (US), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), Royal North Shore Hospital (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Hospital de Câncer de Barretos (BR), Andreas Sygros Hospital (GR), Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital (AU), European Institute of Oncology (IT)
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.