Upfront modified FOLFOXIRI plus panitumumab (pan) versus FOLFOX/pan for unresectable <i>RAS</i> and <i>BRAF</i> wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients: Overall survival (OS) results from the phase III TRIPLETE study by GONO.

3512 Background: TRIPLETE (NCT03231722) is a phase III trial where unresectable RAS/BRAF wt mCRC patients (pts) were randomized 1:1 to first-line FOLFOX/pan (Arm A) or modified FOLFOXIRI/pan (Arm B). The study failed to demonstrate an improved overall response rate, primary endpoint of the study, in Arm B, and did not show any benefit from the intensification of the chemotherapy also in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), early tumor shrinkage, depth of response, R0 resection rate at the price of increased gastrointestinal toxicity. Here we report OS results. Methods: Eligible pts were stratified according to ECOG PS (0-1 vs 2), primary tumor location (right vs left), and liver-only metastases (yes vs no). OS was assessed from randomization to death from any cause. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test stratified by the same factors as per randomization. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using Cox regression models. Results: 435 pts (A/B: 217/218) were enrolled. Main pts' characteristics were median age 59/59 years, ECOG PS 0 80%/84%, synchronous metastases 88%/86%, liver-only disease 38%/39%, left-sided primary tumour 88%/88%; deficient MMR tumours 1%/3%. At a median follow up of 60.2 months (mos), 292 (67%, arm A/B: 71%/63%) OS events were collected. Significantly longer OS was observed in Arm B with a median OS of 41.1 vs 33.3 mos in Arm A (HR: 0.79; 95%CI: 0.63-0.99; p = 0.049). No molecular or clinical groups of interest emerged from the subgroup analyses. While no significant difference in PFS was confirmed (median PFS Arm A/B: 12.4/12.7 mos, p = 0.606), longer post progression survival (PPS) was reported in Arm B (HR: 0.73; 95%CI: 0.57-0.93; p = 0.012). The proportion of pts receiving subsequent lines of therapy was similar between arms (2 nd -line Arm A/B: 73%/71%, 3 rd -line: 52%/50%, 4 th -line: 33%/33%), and no differences were evident in the exposure to anti-EGFRs (Arm A/B 35%/38%) and oxaliplatin (26%/33%) after PD, while higher percentages of pts in ARM A received anti-angiogenics (59%/45%) and irinotecan (66%/56%). Similar percentages of pts received locoregional treatments with radical intent after PD (Arm A/B 16%/15%). Conclusions: Upfront modified FOLFOXIRI/pan provides a statistically significant and clinically meaningful survival advantage compared to standard FOLFOX/pan in pts with RAS/BRAF wt mCRC, with a 7.8 mos difference in median values, though in the absence of any significant difference in treatment activity and PFS. Clinical trial information: NCT03231722 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.3512
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Upfront modified FOLFOXIRI plus panitumumab (pan) versus FOLFOX/pan for unresectable RAS and BRAF wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients: Overall survival (OS) results from the phase III TRIPLETE study by GONO.

Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Veronica Conca, Marco Maria Germani, Federica Marmorino et al.
4 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
4.18
article

Upfront modified FOLFOXIRI plus panitumumab (pan) versus FOLFOX/pan for unresectable RAS and BRAF wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients: Overall survival (OS) results from the phase III TRIPLETE study by GONO.

Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Veronica Conca, Marco Maria Germani, Federica Marmorino, Roberto Moretto, Carmelo Pozzo, I. Toma, Gabriele Masi, Sara Lonardi, Angela Buonadonna, Giovanni Randon, Beatrice Borelli, Francesco Giulio Sullo, Daniele Rossini, Filippo Pietrantonio, Carlotta Antoniotti, Luca Boni, Chiara Cremolini, Cristina Morelli, Eleonora Perissinotto
article en
4 citations

Abstract

3512 Background: TRIPLETE (NCT03231722) is a phase III trial where unresectable RAS/BRAF wt mCRC patients (pts) were randomized 1:1 to first-line FOLFOX/pan (Arm A) or modified FOLFOXIRI/pan (Arm B). The study failed to demonstrate an improved overall response rate, primary endpoint of the study, in Arm B, and did not show any benefit from the intensification of the chemotherapy also in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), early tumor shrinkage, depth of response, R0 resection rate at the price of increased gastrointestinal toxicity. Here we report OS results. Methods: Eligible pts were stratified according to ECOG PS (0-1 vs 2), primary tumor location (right vs left), and liver-only metastases (yes vs no). OS was assessed from randomization to death from any cause. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test stratified by the same factors as per randomization. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using Cox regression models. Results: 435 pts (A/B: 217/218) were enrolled. Main pts' characteristics were median age 59/59 years, ECOG PS 0 80%/84%, synchronous metastases 88%/86%, liver-only disease 38%/39%, left-sided primary tumour 88%/88%; deficient MMR tumours 1%/3%. At a median follow up of 60.2 months (mos), 292 (67%, arm A/B: 71%/63%) OS events were collected. Significantly longer OS was observed in Arm B with a median OS of 41.1 vs 33.3 mos in Arm A (HR: 0.79; 95%CI: 0.63-0.99; p = 0.049). No molecular or clinical groups of interest emerged from the subgroup analyses. While no significant difference in PFS was confirmed (median PFS Arm A/B: 12.4/12.7 mos, p = 0.606), longer post progression survival (PPS) was reported in Arm B (HR: 0.73; 95%CI: 0.57-0.93; p = 0.012). The proportion of pts receiving subsequent lines of therapy was similar between arms (2 nd -line Arm A/B: 73%/71%, 3 rd -line: 52%/50%, 4 th -line: 33%/33%), and no differences were evident in the exposure to anti-EGFRs (Arm A/B 35%/38%) and oxaliplatin (26%/33%) after PD, while higher percentages of pts in ARM A received anti-angiogenics (59%/45%) and irinotecan (66%/56%). Similar percentages of pts received locoregional treatments with radical intent after PD (Arm A/B 16%/15%). Conclusions: Upfront modified FOLFOXIRI/pan provides a statistically significant and clinically meaningful survival advantage compared to standard FOLFOX/pan in pts with RAS/BRAF wt mCRC, with a 7.8 mos difference in median values, though in the absence of any significant difference in treatment activity and PFS. Clinical trial information: NCT03231722 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of Pisa (IT), University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Padua (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IT), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (IT), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Amgen
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
4.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.