Alectinib in children and adolescents with solid or CNS tumors harboring ALK-fusions: A data update from the iMATRIX alectinib phase I/II open-label, multi-center study.

10004 Background: Alectinib is a next generation oral inhibitor of ALK-fusion proteins, being investigated in children and adolescents with ALK-fusion bearing tumors at diagnosis or relapse. Here we present updated safety and efficacy data from the iMATRIX Alectinib phase I-II study (NCT04774718). Methods: Patients, less than 18 years of age, with ALK fusion-positive solid or CNS tumors for whom prior treatment had proven to be ineffective or for whom there was no satisfactory treatment available were eligible. Patients were recruited to Part 1 to confirm the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to monitor drug pharmacokinetics. Investigators reported Best Overall Response according to RANO (CNS tumors) or RECIST v1.1 (solid tumors) criteria with a data cut off of July 2024. Results: In total 22 patients with a median age of 8 years were enrolled. Fourteen patients were diagnosed with solid tumors: inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (n = 9), renal cell carcinoma (n = 2), mesothelioma (n = 1), nephroblastoma (n = 1), and atypical melanocytic tumor (n = 1). Six patients were diagnosed with CNS tumors: high grade glioma (n = 5) and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (n = 1). Two patients had ineligible conditions: histiocytosis (n = 1) and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (n = 1). Among the 22 patients, 14 had not received prior systemic therapy. ALK fusion partners were EML4 and CLTC in 3 patients, TPM3 and KIF5C in 2 patients, and DCTN1, FN1, KIF5B, NPM, PPP1CB, STRN, CLIP1, RANBP2, ZEB2, PLEKHA7, CDC42BPB and HNRNPA3 in 1 patient each. In the 21 safety evaluable patients, only 1 DLT of Grade 3 increased alanine aminotransferase, in the context of multiple viral infections, was reported. The DLT resolved after treatment interruption and Alectinib was restarted at a reduced dose level, and then tolerated well. Eighteen patients (86%) experienced at least one Adverse Event (AE) reported as related to Alectinib, the majority being of Grade 1 and 2 severity. Grade ≥ 3 AEs related to alectinib were reported for 5 patients (23.8%) and there were 2 patients with serious AEs related to Alectinib. There were no new safety signals detected. Investigator reported Best Overall Response rate in 16 patients was 87.5%; (14 PRs) and 2 patients were reported to have stable disease. A partial response was observed in 5/5 evaluable patients with CNS tumors and in 9/11 evaluable patients with solid tumours. Six patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis due to ineligible tumor type (n = 2), not dosed (n = 1), no measurable disease according to RANO criteria (n = 1) or lack of response assessment by the analysis cut-off date (n = 2). Conclusions: Alectinib continues to have a favourable safety profile in pediatric patients. Despite this being a very challenging population to treat, clinical efficacy results are transformational with the majority of patients experiencing a tumor response. Clinical trial information: NCT04774718 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.10004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alectinib in children and adolescents with solid or CNS tumors harboring ALK-fusions: A data update from the iMATRIX alectinib phase I/II open-label, multi-center study.

Nadège Corradini, Michela Casanova, Matthias A. Karajannis, Darren Hargrave et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
1.52
article

Alectinib in children and adolescents with solid or CNS tumors harboring ALK-fusions: A data update from the iMATRIX alectinib phase I/II open-label, multi-center study.

Nadège Corradini, Michela Casanova, Matthias A. Karajannis, Darren Hargrave, Carolina Sturm, Quentin Campbell-Hewson, Adela Cañete, Huanmin Wang, Amar Gajjar, David S. Ziegler, Nicolas Prud'homme, Dhruvitkumar S. Sutaria, Francis Mussai, François Doz, Carla Manzitti, Karsten Nysom, Hyoung Jin Kang, Yeming Wu, Tao Xu, Kyung-Nam Koh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

10004 Background: Alectinib is a next generation oral inhibitor of ALK-fusion proteins, being investigated in children and adolescents with ALK-fusion bearing tumors at diagnosis or relapse. Here we present updated safety and efficacy data from the iMATRIX Alectinib phase I-II study (NCT04774718). Methods: Patients, less than 18 years of age, with ALK fusion-positive solid or CNS tumors for whom prior treatment had proven to be ineffective or for whom there was no satisfactory treatment available were eligible. Patients were recruited to Part 1 to confirm the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to monitor drug pharmacokinetics. Investigators reported Best Overall Response according to RANO (CNS tumors) or RECIST v1.1 (solid tumors) criteria with a data cut off of July 2024. Results: In total 22 patients with a median age of 8 years were enrolled. Fourteen patients were diagnosed with solid tumors: inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (n = 9), renal cell carcinoma (n = 2), mesothelioma (n = 1), nephroblastoma (n = 1), and atypical melanocytic tumor (n = 1). Six patients were diagnosed with CNS tumors: high grade glioma (n = 5) and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (n = 1). Two patients had ineligible conditions: histiocytosis (n = 1) and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (n = 1). Among the 22 patients, 14 had not received prior systemic therapy. ALK fusion partners were EML4 and CLTC in 3 patients, TPM3 and KIF5C in 2 patients, and DCTN1, FN1, KIF5B, NPM, PPP1CB, STRN, CLIP1, RANBP2, ZEB2, PLEKHA7, CDC42BPB and HNRNPA3 in 1 patient each. In the 21 safety evaluable patients, only 1 DLT of Grade 3 increased alanine aminotransferase, in the context of multiple viral infections, was reported. The DLT resolved after treatment interruption and Alectinib was restarted at a reduced dose level, and then tolerated well. Eighteen patients (86%) experienced at least one Adverse Event (AE) reported as related to Alectinib, the majority being of Grade 1 and 2 severity. Grade ≥ 3 AEs related to alectinib were reported for 5 patients (23.8%) and there were 2 patients with serious AEs related to Alectinib. There were no new safety signals detected. Investigator reported Best Overall Response rate in 16 patients was 87.5%; (14 PRs) and 2 patients were reported to have stable disease. A partial response was observed in 5/5 evaluable patients with CNS tumors and in 9/11 evaluable patients with solid tumours. Six patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis due to ineligible tumor type (n = 2), not dosed (n = 1), no measurable disease according to RANO criteria (n = 1) or lack of response assessment by the analysis cut-off date (n = 2). Conclusions: Alectinib continues to have a favourable safety profile in pediatric patients. Despite this being a very challenging population to treat, clinical efficacy results are transformational with the majority of patients experiencing a tumor response. Clinical trial information: NCT04774718 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Ulsan College (KR), Roche (Switzerland) (CH), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Capital Medical University (CN), Université Paris Cité (FR), Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), Istituto Giannina Gaslini (IT), XinHua Hospital (CN), Asan Medical Center (KR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CA), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe (ES), UNSW Sydney (AU), University of Ulsan (KR), Institut d’Hématologie et d’Oncologie Pédiatrique (FR), Centre Léon Bérard (FR), Roche (United Kingdom) (GB), Sydney Children's Hospital (AU), Great North Children's Hospital (GB), Beijing Children’s Hospital (CN), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), University College London (GB), Université de Montréal (CA), Institut Curie (FR)
F. Hoffmann-La Roche
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.