Assessment of ctDNA somatic homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) from SWOG S1416 trial.
1012 Background: HRD is observed in up to two-thirds of g BRCA- wildtype TNBC. S1416 (NCT02595905) showed that addition of a PARP inhibitor (veliparib) to cisplatin improved progression-free survival (PFS) in gBRCA -wildtype metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) with HRD phenotype (“ BRCA -like”). In this study, we sought to evaluate concordance between circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based detection of somatic homologous recombination repair (sHRR) alterations and tumor-based HRD and to assess if sHRR deficiency (sHRR+) was associated with benefit from veliparib in g BRCA -wild type mTNBC in SWOG S1416. Methods: S1416 enrolled patients with mTNBC who had received ≤ 1 line of prior therapy and randomized them to cisplatin plus veliparib or placebo. Central gBRCA1/2 testing classified patients as gBRCA -mutated or -wildtype. An a priori defined biomarker panel classified gBRCA -wildtype patients into BRCA -like (HRD+) and non- BRCA -like (HRD-) groups. A third group with gBRCA -wildtype, but without tissue BRCA classification was also included. Pre-treatment and progression plasma samples were utilized for assessment of sHRR status. ctDNA was analyzed using the Guardant OMNI next-generation sequencing platform. sHRR+ was defined by detectable somatic alterations (SNVs, INDELs, fusions with a functional impact notation of deleterious, and/or CNVs with a functional characterization of homozygous deletion) in a 24 gene panel. Results: Among N =213 g BRCA -wildtype patients with evaluable pre-treatment blood samples, 25% were sHRR+. Among sHRR+ patients, alterations in CHEK2 (18%), BRCA1 (17%), BARD1 (8%), ATM (7%), BAP1 (7%), CDK12 (7%), NBN (7%), BRCA2 (5%), and FANCA (5%) accounted for 80% of sHRR alterations. Most sHRR+ patients (91%) had alterations in only one of 24 genes, suggesting mutual exclusivity of homologous recombination pathway alterations in ctDNA. sHRR+ status was numerically higher in BRCA -like compared to non- BRCA -like tumors or unclassified tumors (32% vs. 20% vs. 20%, respectively; P =0.12). Among n =98 patients with availability of evaluable pre-treatment and progression samples, 31% were sHRR+ at baseline and 28% were sHRR+ at progression. Numerically, conversion from sHRR+ to sHRR- was more common than conversion from sHRR- to sHRR+ (30% vs. 9%, respectively). sHRR was not prognostic for PFS (median 4.3 (sHRR+) vs. 4.1 (sHRR-) months, respectively; P =0.30) nor predictive of benefit from veliparib ( P =0.40). Conclusions: One-fourth of gBRCA- wildtype mTNBC patients have ctDNA sHRR alterations, and there is incomplete overlap between tumor- and ctDNA-assessed HRD. ctDNA sHRR alterations were mostly mutually exclusive. Approximately one-third of patients with baseline sHRR+ converted to sHRR- at time of progression while receiving DNA damaging chemotherapy. sHRR was not prognostic and did not predict benefit from veliparib in S1416.
Authors
- Peter Kühn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2629-4505)
- Harsh B. Pathak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4034-0520)
- Gabriel N. Hortobágyi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4873-4412)
- Lajos Pusztai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9632-6686)
- James Hicks (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5353-4338)
- Andrew K. Godwin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3987-9580)
- Priyanka Sharma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8592-2239)
- James M. Rae (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3412-8219)
- Eve T. Rodler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2064-683X)
- Daniel F. Hayes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3620-7575)
- Shane Richard Stecklein (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8322-5886)
- William E. Barlow (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4651-2282)
- Arielle Yablonovitch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6339-4519)
- Jill Tsai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7244-4477)
- Alastair M. Thompson
Institutions
- University of Southern California (US)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Yale Cancer Center (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Guardant (United States) (US)
- Cancer Research And Biostatistics (US)
- Michigan Medicine (US)
- University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2025-05-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.1012
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.81