Disparities in demographics, clinical features, and outcomes of early-onset colon cancer in the US.

e15700 Background: The incidence of early-onset colon cancer (EO-CC) is rising, but it remains unclear whether EO-CC represents a biologically distinct entity compared to colon cancer in patients aged > 50g. This study analyzed early-onset CC demographics, clinical features, and outcomes using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: Patients with colon adenocarcinoma (2010–2020) were identified in the NCDB and categorized as aged 18–50 or over 50. Baseline characteristics were compared using descriptive statistics. We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models to analyze survival. Results: A total of 75,365 early-onset and 571,982 older CC patients were identified. EO-CC patients were more likely male (52% vs. 49%, p < 0.001), privately insured (70.2% vs. 27%, p < 0.001), and treated at academic facilities (56% vs. 48%, p < 0.001). They had more left-sided disease (51% vs. 33%, p < 0.001), advanced stages at diagnosis (Stage IV: 31.5% vs. 22.4%; p < 0.001), KRAS mutations (9% vs. 5.4%), and MSI-high cases (2.6% vs. 1.8%). Older patients had worse survival than early-onset CC patients on both univariate analysis (5-year survival: 54.2% vs 66.9%, p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis with hazard’s ratio (HR) of 1.63 (95% CI: 1.61–1.66, p < 0.001). Among EO-CC patients, African Americans had worse survival compared to Caucasians (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.17–1.26, p < 0.001). Further stratification of EO-CRC by age (18–30, 31–40, and 41–50 years) revealed that patients aged 18–30 were more likely to have MSI-high status (5.1% vs 2.1%, p < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (32% vs 27.8%, p < 0.001), and perineural invasion (23.8% vs 16.6%, p < 0.001) compared to those aged 41–50. On univariate analysis, patients aged 18-30 had worse survival compared to those aged 31-40 and 41-50 (median OS 40.5 vs 42.2 vs 43.8 months, p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients aged 31-40 had better survival than those aged 18-30 (HR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.98, p = 0.02), while no significant difference was observed between patients aged 18-30 and 41-50 (HR:0.95, 95% CI 0.89 – 1.01, p = 0.2). Conclusions: Early-onset CC is diagnosed at later stages and exhibits distinct clinical features compared to CC in older patients. Patients aged 18–30 experience more aggressive disease, with worse survival due to higher perineural and lymphovascular invasion rates. These findings highlight the heterogeneity within EO-CRC and underscore the need for further research to better understand age-related differences in survival and treatment outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e15700
Primary Topic
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in demographics, clinical features, and outcomes of early-onset colon cancer in the US.

Pravash Budhathoki, Utsav Joshi, Nisheem Pokharel, Ujjwal Karki et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
article

Disparities in demographics, clinical features, and outcomes of early-onset colon cancer in the US.

Pravash Budhathoki, Utsav Joshi, Nisheem Pokharel, Ujjwal Karki, Suman Gaire
article en

Abstract

e15700 Background: The incidence of early-onset colon cancer (EO-CC) is rising, but it remains unclear whether EO-CC represents a biologically distinct entity compared to colon cancer in patients aged > 50g. This study analyzed early-onset CC demographics, clinical features, and outcomes using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: Patients with colon adenocarcinoma (2010–2020) were identified in the NCDB and categorized as aged 18–50 or over 50. Baseline characteristics were compared using descriptive statistics. We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models to analyze survival. Results: A total of 75,365 early-onset and 571,982 older CC patients were identified. EO-CC patients were more likely male (52% vs. 49%, p < 0.001), privately insured (70.2% vs. 27%, p < 0.001), and treated at academic facilities (56% vs. 48%, p < 0.001). They had more left-sided disease (51% vs. 33%, p < 0.001), advanced stages at diagnosis (Stage IV: 31.5% vs. 22.4%; p < 0.001), KRAS mutations (9% vs. 5.4%), and MSI-high cases (2.6% vs. 1.8%). Older patients had worse survival than early-onset CC patients on both univariate analysis (5-year survival: 54.2% vs 66.9%, p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis with hazard’s ratio (HR) of 1.63 (95% CI: 1.61–1.66, p < 0.001). Among EO-CC patients, African Americans had worse survival compared to Caucasians (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.17–1.26, p < 0.001). Further stratification of EO-CRC by age (18–30, 31–40, and 41–50 years) revealed that patients aged 18–30 were more likely to have MSI-high status (5.1% vs 2.1%, p < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (32% vs 27.8%, p < 0.001), and perineural invasion (23.8% vs 16.6%, p < 0.001) compared to those aged 41–50. On univariate analysis, patients aged 18-30 had worse survival compared to those aged 31-40 and 41-50 (median OS 40.5 vs 42.2 vs 43.8 months, p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients aged 31-40 had better survival than those aged 18-30 (HR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.98, p = 0.02), while no significant difference was observed between patients aged 18-30 and 41-50 (HR:0.95, 95% CI 0.89 – 1.01, p = 0.2). Conclusions: Early-onset CC is diagnosed at later stages and exhibits distinct clinical features compared to CC in older patients. Patients aged 18–30 experience more aggressive disease, with worse survival due to higher perineural and lymphovascular invasion rates. These findings highlight the heterogeneity within EO-CRC and underscore the need for further research to better understand age-related differences in survival and treatment outcomes.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
St. Francis Medical Center (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.