Pattern of granulocyte colony stimulating growth factors (G-CSGF) usage in patients treated with sacituzumab govitecan: A real world multicenter study using the TriNetX database.

e13145 Background: Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) a Trop2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) was reported to cause neutropenia among 63% patients in clinical trials [Bardia, NEJM 2021]. G-CSFs are often used to manage chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. However, data on the pattern of G-CSF use among patients receiving SG in real-world settings remain limited. This study aims to evaluate the utilization patterns of G-CSFs in patients treated with Sacituzumab Govitecan and analyze their demographic and clinical characteristics that put them at greater risk for neutropenia using using the TriNetX database. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using the TriNetX database. SG and G-CSF (filgrastim or PEG filgrastim) were identified using RxNorm coding (2360231, 68442, 338036) and neutropenia was identified using ICD-10-CM code. We limited neutropenia or G-CSF usage events to occur within 21 days of SG. We compared cohort SG with neutropenia to SG without neutropenia using TrinetX built-in feature (outcome comparison) for demographic, comorbidities and laboratory parameters. We analyzed the incidence of G-CSF usage in the two cohorts. Results: We analyzed 117 million+ de-identified patients, of which 2317 patients received SG. 28% (639/2317) of the SG recipient had neutropenia (SGN+ cohort), while 72% (N = 1678) did not have neutropenia (SGN- cohort) within 21 days of SG. When the two cohorts were compared, factors associated with neutropenia were Obesity (32% v/s 21%, p < 0.0001), Diabetes Mellitus (25% v/s 18%, p 0.0002), Hypertension (56% v/s 42%, p < 0.0001), Ischemic heart disease (20% v/s 15%, p 0.0034), Cerebrovascular accident (12% v/s 9%, p 0.0203), Chronic kidney disease (17% v/s 12%, p 0.0038). The pattern of use of G-CSF usage differed among the two groups. Among SGN+ cohort, 61% (390/639), received C-GSF, while among SGN- cohort, it was 37% (621/1678). Results in this study are based of TriNetX data available as of 1/28/2025. Conclusions: Our study reveals a lower real-world incidence of neutropenia (28%) among Sacituzumab Govitecan recipients compared to clinical trial reports (63%), suggesting potential differences in patient characteristics or treatment practices. Despite this, most patients who developed neutropenia (61%) required G-CSF support, indicating a significant clinical burden. However, the limited prophylactic use of G-CSF (37%) highlights the need for further research to optimize preventive strategies and mitigate neutropenia-related complications in real-world settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e13145
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pattern of granulocyte colony stimulating growth factors (G-CSGF) usage in patients treated with sacituzumab govitecan: A real world multicenter study using the TriNetX database.

Karan Jatwani, Avi Harisingani, Mahnoor Sukaina, Akshit Chitkara et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

Pattern of granulocyte colony stimulating growth factors (G-CSGF) usage in patients treated with sacituzumab govitecan: A real world multicenter study using the TriNetX database.

Karan Jatwani, Avi Harisingani, Mahnoor Sukaina, Akshit Chitkara, Atulya Aman Khosla, Manas Pustake, Deevyashali Parekh, Rohit Singh, Rahul Mishra, Nitya Batra
article en

Abstract

e13145 Background: Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) a Trop2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) was reported to cause neutropenia among 63% patients in clinical trials [Bardia, NEJM 2021]. G-CSFs are often used to manage chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. However, data on the pattern of G-CSF use among patients receiving SG in real-world settings remain limited. This study aims to evaluate the utilization patterns of G-CSFs in patients treated with Sacituzumab Govitecan and analyze their demographic and clinical characteristics that put them at greater risk for neutropenia using using the TriNetX database. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using the TriNetX database. SG and G-CSF (filgrastim or PEG filgrastim) were identified using RxNorm coding (2360231, 68442, 338036) and neutropenia was identified using ICD-10-CM code. We limited neutropenia or G-CSF usage events to occur within 21 days of SG. We compared cohort SG with neutropenia to SG without neutropenia using TrinetX built-in feature (outcome comparison) for demographic, comorbidities and laboratory parameters. We analyzed the incidence of G-CSF usage in the two cohorts. Results: We analyzed 117 million+ de-identified patients, of which 2317 patients received SG. 28% (639/2317) of the SG recipient had neutropenia (SGN+ cohort), while 72% (N = 1678) did not have neutropenia (SGN- cohort) within 21 days of SG. When the two cohorts were compared, factors associated with neutropenia were Obesity (32% v/s 21%, p < 0.0001), Diabetes Mellitus (25% v/s 18%, p 0.0002), Hypertension (56% v/s 42%, p < 0.0001), Ischemic heart disease (20% v/s 15%, p 0.0034), Cerebrovascular accident (12% v/s 9%, p 0.0203), Chronic kidney disease (17% v/s 12%, p 0.0038). The pattern of use of G-CSF usage differed among the two groups. Among SGN+ cohort, 61% (390/639), received C-GSF, while among SGN- cohort, it was 37% (621/1678). Results in this study are based of TriNetX data available as of 1/28/2025. Conclusions: Our study reveals a lower real-world incidence of neutropenia (28%) among Sacituzumab Govitecan recipients compared to clinical trial reports (63%), suggesting potential differences in patient characteristics or treatment practices. Despite this, most patients who developed neutropenia (61%) required G-CSF support, indicating a significant clinical burden. However, the limited prophylactic use of G-CSF (37%) highlights the need for further research to optimize preventive strategies and mitigate neutropenia-related complications in real-world settings.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Texas Tech University (US), George Washington University Hospital (US), Karachi Medical and Dental College (PK), Thomas Jefferson University (US), SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), Anne Arundel Medical Center (US), University of Vermont Medical Center (US), MacNeal Hospital (US), Loyola Medicine (US), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.