Exploratory study of the association between Healing Scale and symptoms among terminally ill cancer patients

The Healing Scale was developed to measure subjects' sense of healing. This study aimed to investigate the association between the Healing Scale scores and symptom improvement in terminally ill cancer patients. A sub-analysis of a previous sound-based intervention study was performed. Data from 18 terminally ill cancer patients were analyzed. The Healing Scale and symptoms were measured before and 30 minutes after the intervention. Correlations between the Healing Scale score and symptoms before intervention, and improvement of the Healing Scale and symptoms were analyzed using Pearson's rho. The mean age of subjects was 69.4 years and 33.3% were female. At baseline, higher Healing Scale Scores were significantly correlated with greater symptom burden, particularly well-being (ρ=-0.57), shortness of breath (ρ=-0.55), and lack of appetite (ρ=-0.50). At post-intervention, improvements in the Healing Scale scores showed moderate to strong correlations with reductions in shortness of breath (ρ=-0.68), tiredness (ρ=-0.58), and well-being (ρ=-0.56). These findings suggest that the Healing Scale may be a valuable outcome measure in palliative care research and clinical practice and may help to evaluate subjective aspects of patient healing and well-being that are often overlooked by traditional symptom scales. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to validate the present findings in palliative care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Palliative Medicine
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-25-12
Primary Topic
Healthcare and Venom Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploratory study of the association between Healing Scale and symptoms among terminally ill cancer patients

Mitsue Takeuchi, Yuya Ashitomi, Tetsuo Iwata, Tomofumi Miura et al.
Annals of Palliative Medicine
Healthcare and Venom Research
article

Exploratory study of the association between Healing Scale and symptoms among terminally ill cancer patients

Mitsue Takeuchi, Yuya Ashitomi, Tetsuo Iwata, Tomofumi Miura, Takashi Kawaguchi, Mariko Harada, Emi Kubo, Koshin Katsu, Hyozo Taniyama, Takashi Igarashi, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Yukako Hattori, S. Enomoto, Sakiho Noda
article en

Abstract

The Healing Scale was developed to measure subjects' sense of healing. This study aimed to investigate the association between the Healing Scale scores and symptom improvement in terminally ill cancer patients. A sub-analysis of a previous sound-based intervention study was performed. Data from 18 terminally ill cancer patients were analyzed. The Healing Scale and symptoms were measured before and 30 minutes after the intervention. Correlations between the Healing Scale score and symptoms before intervention, and improvement of the Healing Scale and symptoms were analyzed using Pearson's rho. The mean age of subjects was 69.4 years and 33.3% were female. At baseline, higher Healing Scale Scores were significantly correlated with greater symptom burden, particularly well-being (ρ=-0.57), shortness of breath (ρ=-0.55), and lack of appetite (ρ=-0.50). At post-intervention, improvements in the Healing Scale scores showed moderate to strong correlations with reductions in shortness of breath (ρ=-0.68), tiredness (ρ=-0.58), and well-being (ρ=-0.56). These findings suggest that the Healing Scale may be a valuable outcome measure in palliative care research and clinical practice and may help to evaluate subjective aspects of patient healing and well-being that are often overlooked by traditional symptom scales. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to validate the present findings in palliative care settings.

Annals of Palliative MedicineVol. 14(3)
Tohoku University (JP), National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Healthcare and Venom Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.