Palliative radiation oncology programs: improving value through high-quality and cost-effective care

An estimated 40% of all radiation treatments are delivered with non-curative intent, and there is strong evidence that this cohort of patients benefits from the early integration of palliative care services. Palliative radiation oncology programs (PROPs) are teams, processes, or systems that were developed to meet these needs. PROPs address specific issues related to the delivery of palliative radiation therapy (PRT) and try to enhance and improve the quality, cost, timeliness, and value of patient care. While PROPs can be tailored to specifically meet any institutional needs, establishing a sustainable PROP requires commitment from the institution, the systemic integration of standardized care pathways, workflows, and best practice guidelines, collaboration within the oncology team, and dedicated infrastructure resources. PROPs have been shown to improve timely access to care, increase patient and provider satisfaction, advance guideline-concordant care, standardize assessment of palliative care needs, improve palliative care education among radiation oncology residents, and reduce hospital stays and health care costs. While not yet widely adopted, the benefits they provide confirm their value and importance for patients with advanced cancer and for the health care system in general. This article outlines the reasons PROPs were developed, discusses elements related to developing sustainable PROPs, and highlights the value that they provide while reducing costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Palliative Medicine
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-24-171
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Palliative radiation oncology programs: improving value through high-quality and cost-effective care

Jared R. Robbins, Eric M. Chang, Andrew Bruggeman, Kavita Dharmarajan
2 citations
Annals of Palliative Medicine
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
3.76
article

Palliative radiation oncology programs: improving value through high-quality and cost-effective care

Jared R. Robbins, Eric M. Chang, Andrew Bruggeman, Kavita Dharmarajan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

An estimated 40% of all radiation treatments are delivered with non-curative intent, and there is strong evidence that this cohort of patients benefits from the early integration of palliative care services. Palliative radiation oncology programs (PROPs) are teams, processes, or systems that were developed to meet these needs. PROPs address specific issues related to the delivery of palliative radiation therapy (PRT) and try to enhance and improve the quality, cost, timeliness, and value of patient care. While PROPs can be tailored to specifically meet any institutional needs, establishing a sustainable PROP requires commitment from the institution, the systemic integration of standardized care pathways, workflows, and best practice guidelines, collaboration within the oncology team, and dedicated infrastructure resources. PROPs have been shown to improve timely access to care, increase patient and provider satisfaction, advance guideline-concordant care, standardize assessment of palliative care needs, improve palliative care education among radiation oncology residents, and reduce hospital stays and health care costs. While not yet widely adopted, the benefits they provide confirm their value and importance for patients with advanced cancer and for the health care system in general. This article outlines the reasons PROPs were developed, discusses elements related to developing sustainable PROPs, and highlights the value that they provide while reducing costs.

Annals of Palliative MedicineVol. 14(3)
Mount Sinai Health System (US), Kaiser Permanente (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.