Predicting the use of restraint on adult inpatient psychiatric wards: a four-year incident report analysis

Background: The use of restraint on psychiatric inpatient wards varies widely and is poorly understood, but patient characteristics, situational factors and organisational factors have been implicated. Objectives: To understand whether use of restraint differed systematically between wards and sites and then define the relative contribution of patient, situational and organisational factors. Design: Restraint incidents were extracted from incident reporting over a fouryear period. Incidents were drawn from five acute wards and two psychiatric intensive care units across three hospital sites within an NHS Trust in the UK. Two research samples were created. An overall incident sample (N = 1297) was used to assess the degree of variability between wards and sites. Binary logistic regression in a first use of restraint sample (N = 435) then assessed the contribution made by significant patient, situational and organisational predictors. Results: No significant differences between the wards or sites were found for restraint rates and the levels of restraint used. Staff response and time of day were significant predictors of level of restraint. The regression model explained 16.9% of variance in level of restraint. Conclusion: Future research needs to better measure and then model the dynamic relationships between patient, organisational and situational factors that predict restraint. Intervention programmes that target restraint reduction need to be better evaluated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychiatric Intensive Care
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20299/jpi.2025.003
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting the use of restraint on adult inpatient psychiatric wards: a four-year incident report analysis

Stephen Kellett, Matthew Warlow, Melanie Simmonds‐Buckley, Erin Somerville et al.
1 citations
Journal of Psychiatric Intensive Care
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
2.31
article

Predicting the use of restraint on adult inpatient psychiatric wards: a four-year incident report analysis

Stephen Kellett, Matthew Warlow, Melanie Simmonds‐Buckley, Erin Somerville, Laura Turner, Faye Cox, Isobel Dunning
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: The use of restraint on psychiatric inpatient wards varies widely and is poorly understood, but patient characteristics, situational factors and organisational factors have been implicated. Objectives: To understand whether use of restraint differed systematically between wards and sites and then define the relative contribution of patient, situational and organisational factors. Design: Restraint incidents were extracted from incident reporting over a fouryear period. Incidents were drawn from five acute wards and two psychiatric intensive care units across three hospital sites within an NHS Trust in the UK. Two research samples were created. An overall incident sample (N = 1297) was used to assess the degree of variability between wards and sites. Binary logistic regression in a first use of restraint sample (N = 435) then assessed the contribution made by significant patient, situational and organisational predictors. Results: No significant differences between the wards or sites were found for restraint rates and the levels of restraint used. Staff response and time of day were significant predictors of level of restraint. The regression model explained 16.9% of variance in level of restraint. Conclusion: Future research needs to better measure and then model the dynamic relationships between patient, organisational and situational factors that predict restraint. Intervention programmes that target restraint reduction need to be better evaluated.

Journal of Psychiatric Intensive CareVol. 21(1)
Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.