Training in minimally invasive thoracic surgery on 3D-model: back to the future of education

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the standard approach for early-stage lung cancer, offering benefits such as reduced recovery time, shorter hospital stays, and minimized postoperative pain. However, these techniques require advanced motor skills and a deep understanding of thoracic anatomy. Recent technological advancements, specialized surgical instruments, and energy devices, have further improved MIS capabilities. Despite these advancements, the steep learning curve of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) highlights the need for structured simulation-based education to ensure patient safety and optimize skill acquisition. Simulation training provides a risk-free environment for developing technical proficiency before operating on real patients. Virtual simulators, such as LapSim and V-Trainer, are widely used to familiarize trainees with endoscopic instruments and procedural techniques. However, real analog models remain essential for refining motor skills, depth perception, and tactile feedback, which are crucial for complex thoracic procedures. Traditional training methods using wet labs or cadaveric models pose limitations in cost, availability, and ethical concerns. The integration of high-realistic physical anatomical models, including 3D printed anatomical components, represents a promising alternative, offering high-fidelity surgical simulations that mimic real-life operative conditions. At the University of Pisa’s EndoCAS Interdipartimental Center for Computer Assisted Surgery, a structured training program incorporating lung phantoms in a 3D-printed thoracic cage, virtual simulation, and stepwise lobectomy simulations have been developed to enhance thoracic surgery education. This study presents our experience with a hybrid simulation approach, based on the combination of virtual and physical simulation, in lobectomy training, emphasizing its role in bridging theoretical learning with hands-on surgical practice, ultimately improving technical skills and clinical confidence among thoracic surgery residents.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Visualized Surgery
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs-25-16
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training in minimally invasive thoracic surgery on 3D-model: back to the future of education

Marco Lucchi, Maria Giovanna Mastromarino, Giacomo Rabazzi, Andrea Castaldi et al.
1 citations
Journal of Visualized Surgery
Surgical Simulation and Training
2.01
article

Training in minimally invasive thoracic surgery on 3D-model: back to the future of education

Marco Lucchi, Maria Giovanna Mastromarino, Giacomo Rabazzi, Andrea Castaldi, Emanuele Cigna, Sara Condino, Marina Carbone, Marcello Carlo Ambrogi, Vittorio Aprile, Stylianos Korasidis, Francesco Simi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the standard approach for early-stage lung cancer, offering benefits such as reduced recovery time, shorter hospital stays, and minimized postoperative pain. However, these techniques require advanced motor skills and a deep understanding of thoracic anatomy. Recent technological advancements, specialized surgical instruments, and energy devices, have further improved MIS capabilities. Despite these advancements, the steep learning curve of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) highlights the need for structured simulation-based education to ensure patient safety and optimize skill acquisition. Simulation training provides a risk-free environment for developing technical proficiency before operating on real patients. Virtual simulators, such as LapSim and V-Trainer, are widely used to familiarize trainees with endoscopic instruments and procedural techniques. However, real analog models remain essential for refining motor skills, depth perception, and tactile feedback, which are crucial for complex thoracic procedures. Traditional training methods using wet labs or cadaveric models pose limitations in cost, availability, and ethical concerns. The integration of high-realistic physical anatomical models, including 3D printed anatomical components, represents a promising alternative, offering high-fidelity surgical simulations that mimic real-life operative conditions. At the University of Pisa’s EndoCAS Interdipartimental Center for Computer Assisted Surgery, a structured training program incorporating lung phantoms in a 3D-printed thoracic cage, virtual simulation, and stepwise lobectomy simulations have been developed to enhance thoracic surgery education. This study presents our experience with a hybrid simulation approach, based on the combination of virtual and physical simulation, in lobectomy training, emphasizing its role in bridging theoretical learning with hands-on surgical practice, ultimately improving technical skills and clinical confidence among thoracic surgery residents.

Journal of Visualized SurgeryVol. 11
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Surgical Simulation and Training
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.