The Question at Play

Taking as its starting point that legibility is made perceptible by an implied outside of illegibility, this essay asks if the nature of inquiry—about questions of blackness and sexuality—is that of a deferred knowing or if it is knowable at all. Does the very distinction between legibility and illegibility impart an element of refusal? When is questioning as a will to know not so very different from the interrogative of scientific racism, with its reification of discourses of mastery? When no amount of negation can extricate blackness from the inchoate space in which it resides, the author suggests, a phantasmatic structure wherein trauma and play cathect a compulsion to repeat might provide a means to tolerate the intolerable. Blackness here is not a fantasy of object loss, but a phantasmatic chiasmus.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
differences
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-11788756
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Question at Play

Selamawit D. Terrefe
differences
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
article

The Question at Play

Selamawit D. Terrefe
article en

Abstract

Taking as its starting point that legibility is made perceptible by an implied outside of illegibility, this essay asks if the nature of inquiry—about questions of blackness and sexuality—is that of a deferred knowing or if it is knowable at all. Does the very distinction between legibility and illegibility impart an element of refusal? When is questioning as a will to know not so very different from the interrogative of scientific racism, with its reification of discourses of mastery? When no amount of negation can extricate blackness from the inchoate space in which it resides, the author suggests, a phantasmatic structure wherein trauma and play cathect a compulsion to repeat might provide a means to tolerate the intolerable. Blackness here is not a fantasy of object loss, but a phantasmatic chiasmus.

differencesVol. 36(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.