Vulnerabilities in displacement: Can humanitarianism protect women?

Abstract This article develops a conceptual and normative framework for addressing the question of the protection of female forced migrants. While the place of gender in international systems of protection has been a matter of discussion for the past thirty years and feminist (and other) scholars of forced migration have drawn attention to the problems and limitations of humanitarian protection of women, this discussion has lacked a philosophical framework within which to discriminate adequately between gender-blind, gender-sensitive, and gender-transformative approaches to the protection of women, to analyse the significance of the relationships between different stages of displacement for protection, and to specify the salience of different dimensions of autonomy for the gendering of protection. This is the task that this article takes up. We draw on both original fieldwork and on secondary materials to illustrate our theoretical claims, but the purpose of this argument is not to provide additional empirical data on this topic, rather it is to offer a framework within which to understand the normative significance of these data and to outline principles to guide institutional responses to it, and adapted to local realities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Migration Studies
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnaf016
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vulnerabilities in displacement: Can humanitarianism protect women?

Pía Riggirozzi, David Andrew Owen, Natalia Cintra, Gloria Zuccarelli
Migration Studies
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Vulnerabilities in displacement: Can humanitarianism protect women?

Pía Riggirozzi, David Andrew Owen, Natalia Cintra, Gloria Zuccarelli
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article develops a conceptual and normative framework for addressing the question of the protection of female forced migrants. While the place of gender in international systems of protection has been a matter of discussion for the past thirty years and feminist (and other) scholars of forced migration have drawn attention to the problems and limitations of humanitarian protection of women, this discussion has lacked a philosophical framework within which to discriminate adequately between gender-blind, gender-sensitive, and gender-transformative approaches to the protection of women, to analyse the significance of the relationships between different stages of displacement for protection, and to specify the salience of different dimensions of autonomy for the gendering of protection. This is the task that this article takes up. We draw on both original fieldwork and on secondary materials to illustrate our theoretical claims, but the purpose of this argument is not to provide additional empirical data on this topic, rather it is to offer a framework within which to understand the normative significance of these data and to outline principles to guide institutional responses to it, and adapted to local realities.

Migration StudiesVol. 13(2)
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” (IT), University of Southampton (GB)
University of Southampton, European University Institute, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.