Child Healthcare Law in England and Wales – Scotland

This article focuses on the British common law approach of child’s personal involvement in medical decisions. This article seeks for a key of understanding of Court’s decisions that apparently are irreconcilable or contra legem. It assesses how case law makes the balance between the child’s rights and interests and what tests are used by judges to achieve it. The child’s right to make decisions must be balanced with parental responsibility. At the same time welfare protection, age, understanding of the child, must be articulated by the court in ruling on the case. Liability of medical practitioners is also at stake and connected issues must also be considered in drawing the legal frame ruling medical decisions, made with respect to under-18 patients. The legal frame depends on the child’s age and maturity and can be split into three different set of rules that we propose to articulate in a decreasing scale of the child’s legal empowerment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics Medicine and Public Health
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101092
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Child Healthcare Law in England and Wales – Scotland

Laurence Francoz Terminal
1 citations
Ethics Medicine and Public Health
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
3.49
article

Child Healthcare Law in England and Wales – Scotland

Laurence Francoz Terminal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article focuses on the British common law approach of child’s personal involvement in medical decisions. This article seeks for a key of understanding of Court’s decisions that apparently are irreconcilable or contra legem. It assesses how case law makes the balance between the child’s rights and interests and what tests are used by judges to achieve it. The child’s right to make decisions must be balanced with parental responsibility. At the same time welfare protection, age, understanding of the child, must be articulated by the court in ruling on the case. Liability of medical practitioners is also at stake and connected issues must also be considered in drawing the legal frame ruling medical decisions, made with respect to under-18 patients. The legal frame depends on the child’s age and maturity and can be split into three different set of rules that we propose to articulate in a decreasing scale of the child’s legal empowerment.

Ethics Medicine and Public HealthVol. 33
Université Jean Moulin Lyon III (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.