Comparison of Soil Fertility Classification Algorithms Using a Data Mining Tool

To search for the possibility of soil fertility classification, a data mining technique was followed. The open-source data mining toolkit Weka was used for the development of a classification model for soil fertility. Thus, after cleaning and sorting the soil dataset, six classification algorithms, viz., Neural Network, Support Vector Machines, KNN, Random Forest, Random Tree, and Naive Bayes, were used over the soil dataset. The results indicated that the Bayesian-based algorithm has better performance than the function-based, lazy-based, and tree-based algorithms. The Naive Bayes algorithm was found to be the best fit in the classification of soil fertility as it recorded a classification accuracy of 97 %, a sensitivity of 0.97, and a precision of 0.97 as compared with other algorithms. The Naive Bayes algorithm has also achieved the highest F1 score of 0.97 and MCC of 0.94.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Current Research
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56557/ajocr/2025/v10i29360
Primary Topic
Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Soil Fertility Classification Algorithms Using a Data Mining Tool

G. J. Kamani, Rahul Parmar, H. K. Patel, A. T. AGJA
Asian Journal of Current Research
Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
article

Comparison of Soil Fertility Classification Algorithms Using a Data Mining Tool

G. J. Kamani, Rahul Parmar, H. K. Patel, A. T. AGJA
article en

Abstract

To search for the possibility of soil fertility classification, a data mining technique was followed. The open-source data mining toolkit Weka was used for the development of a classification model for soil fertility. Thus, after cleaning and sorting the soil dataset, six classification algorithms, viz., Neural Network, Support Vector Machines, KNN, Random Forest, Random Tree, and Naive Bayes, were used over the soil dataset. The results indicated that the Bayesian-based algorithm has better performance than the function-based, lazy-based, and tree-based algorithms. The Naive Bayes algorithm was found to be the best fit in the classification of soil fertility as it recorded a classification accuracy of 97 %, a sensitivity of 0.97, and a precision of 0.97 as compared with other algorithms. The Naive Bayes algorithm has also achieved the highest F1 score of 0.97 and MCC of 0.94.

Asian Journal of Current ResearchVol. 10(2)
Anand Agricultural University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Soil Fertility Classification Algorithms Using a Data Mining Tool — G. J. Kamani, Rahul Parmar, et al. · Asian Journal of Current Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS