Disinformation as process: modeling the lifecycle of deceit

Abstract This article offers a new conceptual model of disinformation which accounts for the performative status of disinformation accusations, and the dialogistic interaction between accusers and accused, within a multi-aspectual dynamic process involving diverse actors (including those disassociated from various forms of deceit). The model shows how claims acquire or lose their disinformation status, as they transgress temporal, geopolitical, and linguacultural boundaries, those of media genre and platform, as well as, crucially, the boundary separating primary (disinformation) from secondary (counter-disinformation) discourses. We call our model “the lifecycle of disinformation,” as it captures both disinformation’s linear trajectories, and its capacity for constant self-renewal. While eschewing relativism, the article challenges the understanding of disinformation as referentially stable, demonstrably false content which still frames much disinformation research and underpins the working principles of counter-disinformation units (CDUs). To reconceive disinformation according to this model, we develop a 5-step analytical apparatus applicable in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication Theory
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaf009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disinformation as process: modeling the lifecycle of deceit

Stephen Hutchings, В. А. Казаков, Vera Tolz, Sofia Tipaldou
2 citations
Communication Theory
Misinformation and Its Impacts
8.40
article

Disinformation as process: modeling the lifecycle of deceit

Stephen Hutchings, В. А. Казаков, Vera Tolz, Sofia Tipaldou
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article offers a new conceptual model of disinformation which accounts for the performative status of disinformation accusations, and the dialogistic interaction between accusers and accused, within a multi-aspectual dynamic process involving diverse actors (including those disassociated from various forms of deceit). The model shows how claims acquire or lose their disinformation status, as they transgress temporal, geopolitical, and linguacultural boundaries, those of media genre and platform, as well as, crucially, the boundary separating primary (disinformation) from secondary (counter-disinformation) discourses. We call our model “the lifecycle of disinformation,” as it captures both disinformation’s linear trajectories, and its capacity for constant self-renewal. While eschewing relativism, the article challenges the understanding of disinformation as referentially stable, demonstrably false content which still frames much disinformation research and underpins the working principles of counter-disinformation units (CDUs). To reconceive disinformation according to this model, we develop a 5-step analytical apparatus applicable in future research.

Communication TheoryVol. 35(4)
Panteion University (GR), Aarhus University (DK), Danish School of Media and Journalism (DK), University of Manchester (GB), Manchester School of Architecture (GB)
Arts and Humanities Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disinformation as process: modeling the lifecycle of deceit — Stephen Hutchings, В. А. Казаков, et al. · Communication Theory (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS