Competition for food affects the strength of reproductive interference and its consequences for species coexistence

Abstract Competition for food and reproductive interference (negative interspecific sexual interactions) have been identified as major drivers of species exclusion. Still, how these biotic interactions jointly determine competitive dominance remains largely unknown. We tackle this by coupling population models and laboratory experiments with two sibling species of spider mites. Using experiments specifically designed to measure the single and combined effects of food competition and reproductive interference, we first show that the strength and symmetry of reproductive interference between species changes in the presence of food competition. Next, we show that population models incorporating each type of interaction alone lead to markedly different predictions, from systematic exclusion of one of the two species under food competition to priority effects instead favouring this same species (the inferior competitor for food) under the sole effect of reproductive interference. Moreover, accounting for the observed reduction in the strength of reproductive interference in the presence of food competition changes the threshold frequency determining the dominant competitor when both interactions are at play, from equal chances for the two species to exclude the other depending on their initial frequency to favouring the superior competitor for food except when it is extremely rare. Finally, we showed that the model generates accurate predictions for population dynamics in an independent population cage experiment, indicating that our approach captures the most relevant processes governing the outcomes of interactions between competing spider mite species. Altogether, our results suggest that trophic interactions can modulate sexual interactions, significantly impacting population dynamics and competitive outcomes. Hence, the joint consideration of food competition and reproductive interference is critical to accurately predict and understand species coexistence. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Functional Ecology
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.70072
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competition for food affects the strength of reproductive interference and its consequences for species coexistence

Flore Zélé, Vítor C. Sousa, Óscar Godoy, Miguel A. Cruz et al.
2 citations
Functional Ecology
Plant and animal studies
6.05
article

Competition for food affects the strength of reproductive interference and its consequences for species coexistence

Flore Zélé, Vítor C. Sousa, Óscar Godoy, Miguel A. Cruz, Sara Magalhães, Inês Fragata
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Competition for food and reproductive interference (negative interspecific sexual interactions) have been identified as major drivers of species exclusion. Still, how these biotic interactions jointly determine competitive dominance remains largely unknown. We tackle this by coupling population models and laboratory experiments with two sibling species of spider mites. Using experiments specifically designed to measure the single and combined effects of food competition and reproductive interference, we first show that the strength and symmetry of reproductive interference between species changes in the presence of food competition. Next, we show that population models incorporating each type of interaction alone lead to markedly different predictions, from systematic exclusion of one of the two species under food competition to priority effects instead favouring this same species (the inferior competitor for food) under the sole effect of reproductive interference. Moreover, accounting for the observed reduction in the strength of reproductive interference in the presence of food competition changes the threshold frequency determining the dominant competitor when both interactions are at play, from equal chances for the two species to exclude the other depending on their initial frequency to favouring the superior competitor for food except when it is extremely rare. Finally, we showed that the model generates accurate predictions for population dynamics in an independent population cage experiment, indicating that our approach captures the most relevant processes governing the outcomes of interactions between competing spider mite species. Altogether, our results suggest that trophic interactions can modulate sexual interactions, significantly impacting population dynamics and competitive outcomes. Hence, the joint consideration of food competition and reproductive interference is critical to accurately predict and understand species coexistence. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Functional EcologyVol. 39(8)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Lisbon (PT), Université de Montpellier (FR), Estación Biológica de Doñana (ES), Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (FR), Institute for Advanced Study (DE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, European Research Council, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Plant and animal studies
6.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.