Comparative evaluation of penetration of root canal irrigant after using four different activation techniques under confocal laser scanning microscopy: An in vitro study

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the penetration depth of root canal irrigant after using Manual, EndoActivator, Ultra X, and Diode Laser-Assisted Irrigant activation technique. Materials and Methodology: Forty extracted single-rooted human mandibular premolars (N=40) were prepared using Neo Endo Flex Files up to size 25/6%, with saline irrigation during instrumentation. After chemomechanical preparation, canals were filled with Rhodamine B-labelled Twin Kleen dissolved in 10 mL of 3% sodium hypochlorite. Samples were randomly assigned to four groups (N=10) based on the activation technique: Group 1: Manual activation with a 25/6% Gutta Percha cone Group 2: Sonic activation using EndoActivator Group 3: Ultrasonic activation with Ultra X Group 4: Laser activation with a Diode Laser Transverse sections at 2, 5, and 8 mm from the apex were examined using confocal laser scanning microscopy to assess maximum irrigant penetration depth, which was statistically analyzed. Results: Laser activation achieved the greatest penetration in the coronal and apical thirds of root dentin, while Ultra X demonstrated superior penetration in the middle third. Conclusion: Diode laser-assisted irrigant activation showed greater penetration depth in the coronal and apical thirds of root dentin.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2025.v11.i2b.2148
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of penetration of root canal irrigant after using four different activation techniques under confocal laser scanning microscopy: An in vitro study

Alok Kumar Paul
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Comparative evaluation of penetration of root canal irrigant after using four different activation techniques under confocal laser scanning microscopy: An in vitro study

Alok Kumar Paul
article en

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the penetration depth of root canal irrigant after using Manual, EndoActivator, Ultra X, and Diode Laser-Assisted Irrigant activation technique. Materials and Methodology: Forty extracted single-rooted human mandibular premolars (N=40) were prepared using Neo Endo Flex Files up to size 25/6%, with saline irrigation during instrumentation. After chemomechanical preparation, canals were filled with Rhodamine B-labelled Twin Kleen dissolved in 10 mL of 3% sodium hypochlorite. Samples were randomly assigned to four groups (N=10) based on the activation technique: Group 1: Manual activation with a 25/6% Gutta Percha cone Group 2: Sonic activation using EndoActivator Group 3: Ultrasonic activation with Ultra X Group 4: Laser activation with a Diode Laser Transverse sections at 2, 5, and 8 mm from the apex were examined using confocal laser scanning microscopy to assess maximum irrigant penetration depth, which was statistically analyzed. Results: Laser activation achieved the greatest penetration in the coronal and apical thirds of root dentin, while Ultra X demonstrated superior penetration in the middle third. Conclusion: Diode laser-assisted irrigant activation showed greater penetration depth in the coronal and apical thirds of root dentin.

International Journal of Applied Dental SciencesVol. 11(2)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.